London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report tables

Hints from the Health Department. Leaflet from the archive of the Society of Medical Officers of Health. Credit: Wellcome Collection, London

Hackney 1925

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Hackney]

Published
1926
Pages
155
Tables
108

This page requires JavaScript

108 tables in this report

  • Page 15
    Tuberculosis. The principal statistics relating to tuberculosis in the Borough during the past five years are as follows:—
    Years1921.1922.1923.1924.1925.Total.
  • Page 16
    At the close of 1925 there were 1,497 cases of pulmonary and 709 cases of non-pulmonary tuberculosis on the register. Tuberculosis Dispensaries.
    Years1921.1922.1923.1924.1925.Total
  • Page 25
    COMPARATIVE TABLE, YEAR 1925.
    Name of Borough.Population.Birth Rate.Zymotic Death Rate.Death Rate all causes.Infant Mortality.
  • Page 27
    Table showing Estimated Population, Area and Density of the Registration Sub-Districts in Hackney at middle of 1925.
    NorthCentralSouth-WestSouth-EastTotal for HackneyTotal for London
  • Page 28
    Register of Rainfall during the year at CAapton Pcnd—1925.
    Month.Total rainfall.No. of days on which rain fell.Heavieestfall.Remarks.
  • Page 29
    The following table gives the number of marriages and mat riage-rates for the Borough of Hackney and London during the years, 1915-1925.
    Year.Borough of Hackney.London.
    Marriages.Marriage rate.
  • Page 30
    NOTIFICATION of BIRTHS ACT, 1907. Notifications of Births (Live and Still-born) received during the year 1925.
    YearMedical PractitionersMidwives.Parents and Others.Total.
    Lire.Still.Live.Still.Live.Still.Live.Still.
    1935.M.FM.F.M.F.M.F.M.F.M.F.M.F.M..F.
  • Page 31
    The following table gives the number of registered births birth-rates, etc., for the Sub-districts in the Borough:—
    Registration District of HackneyRegistration Sub-districtAll London
    NorthCentralSouth-WestSouth-East
  • Page 31
    Birth-rate for the Borough of Hackney and its Sub-Districts for the years 1915-1925 compared with that of London.
    YearBorough of HackneyNorth Sub-DistrictCentral Sub-DistrictSouth-West Sub-DistrictSouth-East Sub-DistrictLondon
  • Page 32
    Amongst the Registration Sub-districts the death-rate was lowest in the Central Sub-district (110 per 1,000), the highest in the South-west Sub-district (12. per 1,000).
    Sub-district.Population (estimated).Total No. of Births. Uncorrected.* Birth rate. Uncorrected.Total Deaths Cor'ted.Death-rate.Deaths under 1 year.Infant Mortality per 1,000 Births. Uncorrected.
  • Page 32
    The following shows the death-rate of Hackney from all causes per 1,000, compared with London during the last decade:—
    Year.Hackney.London.Year.Hackney.London.
  • Page 33
    INFANT MORTALITY, 1925. Nett deaths from stated causes at various ages under 1 year of age.
    Cause of Death.Under 1 week1-2 weeks2-3 weeks3-4 weeksTotal under 4 weeks4 weeks and under 3 months.3 months and under 6 months.6 months and under 9 months.9 months and under 12 months.Total Deaths under 1 year.
  • Page 34
    Institutions within the Borough receiving persons both from and without the Borough.
  • Page 35
    Institutions outside the Borough receiving sick and infirm persons residing in the Borough.
  • Page 36
    Continued to previous page...
  • Page 37
    Continued from previous page...
  • Page 37
    Death Rates and Infantile Mortality Rates in the London Boroughs for the year 1925.
  • Page 38
    Inquests.
    Verdict.Sex.
    Male.Female.
  • Page 38
    Table showing nature of Suicidal and Accidental Deaths in the Borough of Hackney during the year 1925.
    Nature of Suicide.No.Nature of Accidental Death.No.
  • Page 39
    TABLE I. Vital Statistics of Whole District during 1925 and Previous Years.
    Year.Population estimated to middle of each year.Births.Total Deaths Registered in the District.Transferable DeathsNett Deaths belonging to the District.
    Uncorrected Number.Nett Number.Rate.of Nonresidents registered in the District.of residents not registered in the District.Under 1 Year of AgeAt all Ages.
    Number.Rate.
    Number.Rate per 1,000 Nett Births.Number.Rate.
    12345678910111213
  • Page 40
    Notifiable Diseases during the year 1925 (Deaths in Hospitals)
    Disease.No. of Deaths in Hospitals.Total Deaths.
  • Page 41
    TABLE II.- INFECTIOUS DISEASE. Notifiable Diseases during the Year 1925 (Age groups of notifications).
    Diseases.Cases NotifiedTotal Cases Notified in each Locality.Total cases removed to Hospital.
    At all Ages.At Ages—Years.1234
    Under 1.1 to 22 to 33 to 44 to 55 to 1010 to 1515 to 2020 to 3535 to 4545 to 6565 and upwards.North.Central.South-East.South-West.
  • Page 42
    Notifications of Infectious Disease, years 1921-5.
    Disease.19211922192319241925
  • Page 43
    Notifiable Diseases during the year 1925 (Age Groups of Deaths).
    Disease.Total cases notified.Cases admitted to Hospital.Age Groups of Deaths.Total deaths at all ages.
    Under 11 to 22 to 33 to 44 to 55 to 1010 to 1515 to 2020 to 3535 to 4545 to 6565 and upwards.
  • Page 44
    Summary of Proceedings under the Vaccination Acts, 1867 to 1898, during the year 1925.
    Registration Sub-District.No. of Cases in Birth Lists received during Year.No. of Certificates of Vaccination received.No of Certificates of Postponement owing toNo. of Certificates under Section 2 of Vaccination Act, 1898, and No, of Statutory Declarations under Section 1 of the Vaccination Act, 1907.No. of Certificates of Insusceptibility or of having had Smallpox.No. of Cases.No. of Entries in Lists sent to Public Vaccinator
    Health of Child.Condition of House.Prevalence of Infectious Disease.Parents Removed out of District.Otherwise not found.
  • Page 45
    The following table shows the distribution of scarlet fever in the respective Sub-districts of the Borough:—
    Sub-Districts.North.Central.South-west.South-east.
  • Page 46
    The following table shows the distribution of diphtheria in the respective Sub-districts of the Borough:—
    Sub-Districts.North.Central.South-west.South-east.
  • Page 47
    The following table shows the number of attacked persons under 15 years of age not known to have had a previous attack of Scarlet Fever and Diphtheria as they are housed, as follows:—
    Disease.Cases removed to HospitalCases nursed at Home
    Less than 1 person per room1 to 2 persons per roomMore than 2 persons per roomLess than 1 person per room1 to 2 persons per roomMore than 2 persons per room
  • Page 47
    The table below gives the distribution of the notified cases in the Sub-districts of the Borough:—
    Sub-Districts.North.Central.South-west.South-east.
  • Page 48
    The following table shows the distribution of the disease in the Sub-districts of the Borough:—
    Sub-Districts.North.Central.South-west.South-east.
  • Page 49
    Ophthalmia Neonatorum. —There were:—
    CasesVision UnimpairedVision ImpairedTotal BlindnessDeaths
    NotifiedTreated
    At HomeIn Hospital
  • Page 51
    The following table gives the distribution of the deaths from this disease in the different sub-districts of the Borough:—
    Sub-Districts.North.Central.South-west.South-east.
  • Page 51
    Below is given a table showing the number of deaths and death rates due to malignant disease in this Borough for the 10 years ending 1925:—
  • Page 52
    CANCER, 1925. Analysis of the Deaths from Cancer, Malignant Tumour, Sarcoma and other forms.
    1-55-1515-2525-3535-4545-5555-6565-7575-85and up. 85 wardsTotal.
  • Page 53
    TUBERCULOSIS.
    Age PeriodsNew CasesDeaths
    PulmonaryNon-PulmonaryPulmonaryNon-Pulmonary
    M.F.M.F.M.F.M.F.
  • Page 54
    These deaths are classified as follows:-
  • Page 54
    Primary Notifications and Deaths during the years 1916-1925.
    Year.Primary Notifications.Deaths.Death Rate.
    Pul.Non-pul.Total.Pul.Non-pul.Total.
  • Page 54
    In the following table the yearly deaths from tuberculous diseases in the Borough for the last 28 years are shown, grouped in periods of periods of three years:—
    Three year periods.Annual average number of deaths from Tuberculous Disease.Percentage decrease on the period 1898-1900.
  • Page 55
    The deaths are distributed in the sub-districts of the Borough as shown below:—
    Sub-Districts.North.Central.South-west.South-east.
  • Page 56
    Summary of Notifications during the period from 4th January, 1925, to 2nd January, 1926.
    Age Periods.Notifications on Form A. and Primary Notifications.Total Notifications on Form A.
    0 to 11 to 55 to 1010 to 1515 to 2020 to 2525 to 3535 to 4545 to 5555 to 6565 and upwardsTotal Primary Notifications.
  • Page 56
    Summary of Notifications during the period from 4th January, 1925, to 2nd January, 1926
    Age Periods.Number of Notifications on Form B.Number of Notifications on Form C.
    Number of Primary Notifications.Total Notifications on Form B.Poor Law Institutions.Sanatoria.
    Under 55 to 1010 to 15Total Primary Notifications.
  • Page 57
    New cases of Tuberculosis coming to the knowledge of the Medical Officer of Health during the same period, otherwise than by notification on Form A or Form B, under the Public Health (Tuberculosis) Regulations, 1912.
    Age periods.0 to 11 to 55 to 1010 to 1515 to 2020 to 2525 to 3535 to 4545 to 5555 to 6565 and upwardsTotal Cases.
  • Page 60
    The following is a summary of the quarterly returns furnished to the London County Council during the year:—
    Pulmonary.Non-pulmonary.
    Male.Female.Male.Female.
  • Page 60
    Visits paid by Tuberculosis Visitors.
    New Cases.ContactsSailors and SoldiersOther Persons.Total.Insured.Non-insured.
  • Page 65
    DISPENSARY DISTRICTS. Estimated Population in Electoral Wards.
  • Page 66
    Continued from previous page...
  • Page 66
    DISPENSARY DEATHS. Condition of Patient on First Ittendance. Pulmonary Tuberculosis
    1st Stage.2nd Stage.3rd Stage.
  • Page 67
    ALL DEATHS FROM TUBERCULOSIS. Interval elapsing between Notification and Death.
    1923.1924.1925.
    Pul.Non-pul.Pul.Non-pulPul.Non-pul
  • Page 68
    CITY OF LONDON HOSPITAL TUBERCULOSIS DISPENSARY. (Dr. Howell.) HACKNEY CASES TREATED.
  • Page 69
    3.- The Diagnosis of the New Cases.
  • Page 70
    6.— Other Figures.
    Insured.Uninsured.
  • Page 70
    METROPOLITAN HOSPITAL TUBERCULOSIS DISPENSARY. (Dr. Young.) HACKNEY CASES TREATED. 1. —The Totals of New Cases.
  • Page 71
    3.— The Diagnosis of the New Cases.
    Diagnosis.Insured.Uninsured.Total.
    Males.Females.Children under 15.Males.Females.
  • Page 72
    6.— Other Figures.
    Insured.Uninsured.
  • Page 73
    Advanced Cases. The following table shows the place of death of Hackney inhabitants during 1925, and it is apparent from this what a large proportion of deaths occur in the patients' homes.
    Place where death occurred.Pulmonary Tuberculosis.Other forms of Tuberculosis.Totals.
  • Page 73
    PULMONARY TUBERCULOSIS. Places where death occurred during the years 1921-5.
    Year.At home.At Hackney Infirmary.Other Institutions.Total.
  • Page 76
    The number of rooms fumigated and cleansed each month is set out in the following table:— Number of rooms fumigated and cleansed each month during 1925.
    Month.Rooms Fumigated.Rooms Cleansed.
  • Page 77
    Articles Disinfected, 1925.
    Description of Articles.January.February.March.April.May.June.July.August.September.October.November.December.Totals.
  • Page 78
    In addition to these there were 566 articles destroyed on request from the owners. These are set out in the following table:—
    Articles Destroyed.
  • Page 78
    (c) Public Library Books. —During the past years 452 book from homes in which infectious diseases had occurred were dis infected. The method of disinfection of books practised is t expose the books in a closed chamber to the action of burninj sulphur.
    Books Disinfected.
    Month.Number.
  • Page 79
    The following are the Schools from which children were sent to the Cleansing Station, with the number of baths given:—
    Number Cleansed.
    Schools.Hot Baths.Sulphur Baths.
  • Page 80
    Continued from previous page...
    Hot Baths.Sulphur Baths.
  • Page 81
    The follow1ng table g1ves part1culars of the number, etc., of persons who were bathed and cleansed for paras1t1c d1sease at the D1s1nfect1ng Stat1on dur1ng the year.
    January.February.March.April.May.June.July.August.September.October.November.December.Totals
  • Page 84
    Clinics and Treatment Centres.—
    Name and Situation.Nature of Accommodation.By whom provided.
  • Page 85
    Continued from previous page...
    Name and Situation.Mature of Accommodation.By whom provided.
    Metropolitan Hospital, Kingsland Road, E.8Treatment ClinicLondon County Council
  • Page 86
    The following institutions are subsidised by the Ministry of Health, but not by the Borough Council, with the exception of
    Name and Situation.Nature of Accommodation.By whom provided.
  • Page 88
    Conditions Found by the Visitors.
    No. of Infants visited.Method of Feeding.Separate cot provided for Infant.Use of Comforter.Home conditions.Secondary visits.
    BreastArtificial.Mixed.Yes.No.Yes.No.Satisfactory.Un- satis- fac- tory.
  • Page 90 91
    1. Pr1mary V1s1ts 2. Total v1s1ts. V1S1TS OF HEALTH V1S1TORS 1925.
    M1ss M. Ch1tsonMrs. A. RhodesM1ss D. F. V1dalMrs. L. E. BartholomewM1ss S. LoveM1ss A. RocheMrs. L. Harr1sonM1ss M. CockleTemporary V1s1tors.Eton M1ss1on (voluntary)Hackney Grove (voluntary)Totals.
    121212121212121212121212
  • Page 92
    SUMMARY OF CENTRE WORK. Infant Consultation Centres.
    Centre.No. of times Centre openNo. of primary cases brought to Centre.Repeated visits to Centre.Total attendances.Total attendances of Infants under 1 year.Total attendances of children over 1 year.No. of attendances of infants and children before Welfare Doctor.
  • Page 92
    Ante-Natal Welfare Centres.
    Centre.No. of times Centre openedNo. of expectant mothers attendingNo. of repeated attendances at CentreTotal attendancesNo. of examinations by Doctor.
  • Page 93
    Necessitous Cases.
    Cases.Cost.
  • Page 94
    4.— NURSING ASSISTANCE. As already stated, only a fraction of the cases have been dealt with.
    No. of cases Nursed.Vo. of Visits paid.
  • Page 94
    The applications dealt with for milk numbered 2,671, and those for milk food amounted to 952. Dried Milk, Foods, Medicines, etc.
    £s.d.
  • Page 95
    Continued to previous page...
    (b) Supplied at cost price:—£s.d.
  • Page 99
    SANITARY ADMINISTRATION. HOUSINC AND WORK OF SANITARY INSPECTION. Public Health (London) Act, 1891.
    Year.Intimation Notices.Statutory Notices.Legal Proceedings.
  • Page 100
    These homes were inspected, with the following results:—
    No. of Homes Inspected.No. of Homes where Rooms alone were found Verminous.No. of Homes where Bedding or Clothes and Rooms were found Verminous.No. of Homes not Verminous.
  • Page 106
    In 130 of these premises the sanitary accommodation was defective, unsuitable or insufficient, or not separate for the sexes.
    Nuisance.Found.Abated by Workshop Inspector.Abated by District Inspector.Outstanding.
  • Page 106
    Prosecutions under the Public Health (London) Act, 1891, and Regulations during the year 1925.
    Inspector.Address.Complaint.Magistrate's decision.Fine.Costs.
  • Page 107
    Continued to previous page...
    Inspector.Address.Complaint.Magistrate's Decision.Fine.Costs.
    £s.£s.d.
  • Page 108
    Continued from previous page...
    Inspector.Address.Complaint.Magistrate's decision.Fine.Costs.
    £s.£s.d.
  • Page 110
    (a) Wearing Apparel.
    Occupations.No. of workshops.Occupations.No. of Workshops.
  • Page 111
    1.—INSPECTION. Including Inspections made by Sanitary Inspectors or Inspectors of Nuisances.
    Premises.Number of
    Inspections.Written Notices.Prosecutions.
  • Page 111
    2.—DEFECTS FOUND.
    Particulars.Number of Defects.Number of Prosecutions.
    Found.RemediedReferred to H.M. Inspector.
  • Page 112
    3.—REGISTERED WORKSHOPS.
    Workshops on the Register (S. 131) at the end of the year.Number.
  • Page 112
    4.—OTHER MATTERS.
    Class.Number.
  • Page 113
    5.—HOME WORK.
    Nature of Work.Outworkers' Lists, Section 107.Outwork in Unwholesome Premises, Section 108Outwork in Infected Premises Sections 109, 110.
    Lists received from Employers.Notices served on Occupiers as to keeping or sending Lists.Prosecutions.Instances.Notices served.Prosecutions.Instances.Orders Made (Section 110).Prosecutions (Sections 109, 110.
    Twice in the year.Once in the year.Failing to keep or permit inspection of Lists.Falling to send Lists.
    Lists.Outworkers.Lists.Outworkers.
    Con-tractorsWorkmen.Con. tractorsWorkmen.
  • Page 114
    The following analysis shows the trades followed by these outworkers:—
    Trade.No. of Outworkers.Trade.No. of Out workers.
  • Page 120
    Food Premises Regulated by Statute Bye-laws or Regulations.
    Number.
  • Page 122
    In accordance with the Order the following; samples were taken and submitted to bacteriological examination:—
    Date.Producer.Dealer.Bacteriologist's report.
  • Page 123
    1. Milk ; and Cream not sold as Preserved Cream.
    (a)(b)
    Number of Samples examined for the presence of a Preservative.Number in which Preservative was reported to be present, and Percentage of Preservative found in each Sample.
  • Page 126
    During the year the following unsound food was surrendered or destroyed:—
    Tons.Cwts.Qrs.Lbs.
  • Page 135
    Sale of Food and Drugs Acts, 1875-1907. Samples purchased during 1925.
    Articles Purchased.Number purchasedNumber Adulterated.Number where Proceedings taken.
  • Page 136
    Continued from previous page...
    Articles Purchased.Number purchased.Number Adulterated.Number where Proceedings taken.
  • Page 137
    Prosecutions under the Sale of Food and Drugs Acts, during the Year 1925.
    No. of SampleInspectorArticleAdulteration or OffenceResult of Legal ProceedingsFineCosts
    £s.d.£s.d.
  • Page 140 141
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS. 1925.
    Mr. Ellis, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew. No. 1 District.Mr. Vobe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 DistrictMr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 District.Mr. Long, No. 8 District.Mr. Golds worthy No. 9 District.Mr. Peverett. No. 10 and Special District.Mr. Hillier, No. 11 District.Mr. Crook, No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove No. 13 District.Mr. Hall, No. 14 District.Mr. Fowler. No. 1 and Special District.Mr. Nighy, No. 10 and Special District.Mr. Galvin, Special.Mr. Bobbitt, i Special.Miss Teebay, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTAL
  • Page 142 143
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1925.
    Mr. Ellis, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew. No. 2 District.Mr. Vobe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District.Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 District.Mr. Long, No. 8 District.Mr. Goldsworthy No. 9 District.Mr. Peverett. Mo. 10 and Special District.Mr. Hillier, No. 11 District.Mr. Crook, | No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove No. 13 District.Mr. Hall, No. 14 District.Mr. Fowler. No. 1 and Special District.Mr. Nighy. No. 10 and Special District.Mr. Galvin, Special.Mr. Bobbitt, Special.Miss Teebay, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTAL.
  • Page 144 145
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1925.
    Mr. Ellis, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew. No. 2 District.Mr. Vobe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District.Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 District.Mr. Long, No. 8 District.Mr. Goldsworthy No. 9 District.Mr. Peverett. No. 10 and Special District.Mr. Hilllier. No. 11 District.Mr. Crook, No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove No 13 District.Mr. Hall, No. 14 District.Mr. Fowler, No. 1 and Special District.Mr. Nighy, No. 10 and Spccial District.Mr. Galvin, Special.Mr. Bobbitt, Special.Miss Teebay, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTAL
  • Page 146 147
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1925.
    Mr. Ellis, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew. No. 2 District.Mr. Vobe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District.Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 District.Mr. Long, No. 8 DistrictMr. Golds worthy No. 9 District.Mr. Peverett, Mo. 10 and Special District.Mr. Hillier,No. 11 District.Mr. Crook, No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove No. 13 District.Mr. Hall, No. 14 District.Mr. Fowler. No. 1 and Special District.Mr. Nighy, No. 10 and Special District.Mr. Galvin, Special.Mr. Bobbitt, Special.Miss Teebay, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTAL
  • Page 148 149
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1925.
    Mr. Ellis, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew. No. 2 District.Mr. V'obe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District.Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 District.Mr. Long, No. 8 District.Mr. Goldsworlhy No. 9 District.Mr. Peverett, No. 10 and Special DistrictMr. Hillier, No. 11 District.Mr. Crook, No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove No. 13 District.Mr. Hall, No. 14 District.Mr. Fowler. No. 1 and Special District.Mr. Nighy, No. 10 and Special District.Mr. Galvin, Special.Mr. Bobbitt, Special.Miss Teebay, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTAL.
  • Page 150 151
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1925.
    Mr. Ellis, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew. N'o. 2 District.Mr. Vobc, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District. Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 DistrictMr. Long, No. 8 District.Mr. Goldsworfhy No. 9 District.Mr. Peverett. No. 10 and Special District.Mr. Hillier, No. 11 District.Mr. Crook, No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove No. 13 District.Mr. Hall, No. 14 District.Mr. Fowler. No. 1 and Special District.Mr. Nighy, No. 10 and Special District.Mr. Galvin, Special.Mr. Bobbitt, Special.Miss Teebay, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTAL
  • Page 152
    TABLE OF DEATHS Of Inhabitants of the Borough of Hackney during the year 1925.
    AGESUnder 1 year.1 to 2.2 to 5.5 to 15.15 to 25.25 to 35.35 to 45.45 to 55.55 to 65.65 to 75.75 to 85.85 and upwards.All ages.
  • Page 153
    TABLE OF DEATHS— continued.
    AGESUnder 1 year1 to 2.2 to 5.5 to 15.15 to 25.25 to 35.35 to 45.45 to 55.55 to 65.65 to 75.75 to 85.85 and upwards.All ages.
  • Page 154
    TABLE OF DEATHS— continued.
    AGESUnder 1 year.1 to 2.2 to 5.5 to 15.15 to 25.' 25 to 35.35 to 45.45 to 55.55 to 65.65 to 75.75 to 85.85 and upwards.All ages.
  • Page 155
    TABLE OF DEATHS— continued.
    AGESUnder 1 year.1 to 2.2 to 5.5 to 15.15 to 25.25 to 35.35 to 45.45 to 55.55 to 65.65 to 75.75 to 85.85 and upwards.All ages.
  • Page 156
    TABLE OF DEATHS— continued.
    AGESUnder 1 year.1 to 2.2 to 5.5 to 15.15 to 25.25 to 35.35 to 45.45 to 55.55 to 65.65 to 75.75 to 85.85 and upwards.All ages.
  • Page 157
    TABLE OF DEATHS— continued.
    AGESUnder 1 year.1 to 2.2 to 5.5 to 15.15 to 25.25 to 35.35 to 45.45 to 55.55 to 65.65 to 75.75 to 85.85 and upwards.All ages.
  • Page 158
    TABLE OF DEATHS— continued.
    AGESUnder 1 year.1 to 2.2 to 5.5 to 15.15 to 25.25 to 35.35 to 45.45 to 55.55 to 65.65 to 75.75 to 85.85 and upwards. ,All ages.
  • Page 159
    TABLE III. Causes of, and Age at, Death during the year 1925.
    Causes of Death.Deaths at Subjoined Ages.Deaths in Public Institutions.
    All AgesUnder 1.1 and under 2.2 and under 5.5 and under 15.15 and under 25.25 and under 45.45 and under 65.65 and upwards.