London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report tables

London County Council 1935

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for London County Council]

Published
1936
Pages
187
Tables
186

This page requires JavaScript

186 tables in this report

  • Page -
    The age and sex-distribution of this estimated population is as follows :— Table 1.
    Age groupMalesFemalesTotal
  • Page 6
    in 1934. The births in the resident populations of each metropolitan borough during 1935 were as follows :— Table 2.—County of London—Births, 1935.
    Metropolitan boroughsLive-birthsStill-birthsTotal
    LegitimateIllegitimateLegitimateIllegitimateLegitimateIllegitimate
  • Page 6
    The distribution of deaths by ages in 1935 and recent preceding periods is shown in the following table :— Table 3
  • Page 7
    Table 4.—County of London—Deaths from street accidents.
    YearAge-group
    0-55-1515-2525-4545-6565 +All ages.
  • Page 7
    The movement of the death-rate from the principal diseases at ages below one year since 1910 are shown in the following table :— Table 5.
    Cause of deathl911 to 19141916 to 19181919 to 19221923 to 19261927 to 19301931 to 193419311932193319341935
  • Page 8
    The deaths among infants under one year of age in age groups from the causes included in the above table are shown by sex and according to legitimacy in the following table :— Table 6.—County of London—Infant Mortality, 1935.
    Cause of deathAge at deathTotal
    Under 4 weeks4 weeks to 3 months3 months to 6 months6 months to 9 months9 months to 1 yearNumberMalesFemales
  • Page 9
    Table 7.—Total balance of migration during various intercensal periods, (+ = migration in, — = migration out.)
    PeriodDifference between natural and actual increase (decrease) of population during periodDifference between expected and actual survivors according to the life table
  • Page 10
    Table 8.—Balance of migration. County of London—1841-1931 (+ = migration in, — = migration out.)
    Intercensal periodPopulation at the beginning of periodNet migration during periodMigration : Rate per 1,000 mean population during periodOuter ring
    Populat ion at beginning of periodIncrease during period
  • Page 11
    Table 9.—Balance of migration at various age.i expressed as a rate per 1,000 mean population of the age group during the period (+ = migration in, — = migration out.)
    Ape at migrationPersons1891-1901 MalesFemales1901-1911
    PersonsMalesFemales
  • Page 11
    Continued from previous page...
    Age at migration1911-211921-31
    PersonsMalesFemalesPersonsMalesFemales
  • Page 12
    Table 10.—County of London—Balance of migration during successive intercensal periods amongst persons attaining the ages stated at the end of each period. (+ = migration in, — = migration out.)
    Age at end of period1841-511851-611861-71
    MalesFemalesMalesFomalesMalesFemales
  • Page 12
    Continued from previous page...
    Age at end of period1871-811881-911891-1901
    MalesFemalesMalesFemalesMalesFemales
  • Page 12
    Continued from previous page...
    Age at end of period1901-111911-211921-31
    MalesFemalesMalesFemalesMalesFemales
  • Page 13
    Table 11.—County of London—Intercensal balance of migration by ages. ( + = migration in, — = migration out.)
    Age at time of migration1891-19011901-1911
    PersonsMales FemalesPersonsMalesFemales
  • Page 13
    Continued from previous page...
    Age at time of migrationPersons1911-19211921-1931
    MalesFemalesPersons;MalesFemales
  • Page 15
    Table 12.
    Year19251926192719281929193019311932193319341935
  • Page 15
    The following table shows the age incidence of actual cases of cerebro-spinal fever, encephalitis lethargiea and poliomyelitis (including polioencephalitis). Table 13.
    Age periodsUnder 33-55-1010-2020-3030-4040-5050-60Over 60Total
  • Page 16
    The death-rates in London and England and Wales in recent years have been as follows :— Table 14.
    Area.19241925192619271928192919301931193219331934
  • Page 16
    The following statement shows the numbers of cases reported from the schools during certain periods of this and the two preceding epidemics :—
    1931-321933-341935-36
  • Page 16
    The death-rates in London and England and Wales in recent years are show in the following table :— Table 15.
    Area19241925192619271928192919301931193219331934
  • Page 17
    The movement of the death-rate from whooping-cough in London during past thirty years is broadly shown by the figures in the following table :— Table 10.—County of London—Decennial whooping-cough mortality since 1900.
    Age-groupMean alluvial death-rate per 1,000 of population of cacli age-group
    1901-101911-19201921-1930
  • Page 17
    The seasonal incidence, as shown by the notifications (uncorrected for errors of diagnosis) received in successive four-weekly periods during the year, was as follows :— Table 17.
  • Page 17
    The notifications (uncorrected for errors in diagnosis), deaths and crude case-mortality during 1935 were as follows :— Table 18.
    Year 1935Age-periodTotal
    0-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10-15 +
  • Page 17
    The death-rates in London and England and Wales in recent years are shown in the following table :— Table 19.
    Area19241925192619271928192919301931193219331934
  • Page 18
    The seasonal incidence, as shown by the notifications (uncorrected for errors of diagnosis) received in successive four-weekly periods during the year, was as follows:— Table 20.
  • Page 18
    The notifications (uncorrected for errors in diagnosis), deaths and crude case-mortality during 1935 were as follows :— Table 21.
    Year 1935Age-periodTotal
    0-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10-15 +
  • Page 18
    The death-rates in London and England and Wales in recent years are shown in the following table :— Table 22.
    Area19241925192619271928192919301931193219331934
  • Page 19
    to 1927 and 1928 to 1935, together with the deaths in childbirth in 1935, are shown in the following table :— Table 23.
    Metropolitan boroughs arranged in topographical orderChildbirth deaths per 1,000 live birthsNumber of deaths in ohildbirth
    1920-271928-351935
    Puerperal feverOther causesTotalPuerperal feverOther causesTotalPuerperal feverOther causesTotal
  • Page 20
    Table 24.—London—Deaths in childbirth and pregnancy : age distribution, 1931-34.
    Metropolitan boroughMarried womenUnmarried women
    15-20-25-30-35-40-45 +TotalDeath from sepsisAll other deaths
    AbortionOther casesAbortionOther cases
  • Page 21
    Table 25.—London maternal deaths, 1931-34.—Place of death of married women dying in pregnancy and childbirth.
    Metropolitan boroughDeathsPlace of deathTotal
    l.C.C. general hospitalsl.C.C. special hospitalsVoluntary hospitalsNursing homes
    AbortionsOtherWith maternity bedsOtherWith maternity bedsOtherHome
  • Page 21
    Table 26.—London—Maternal deaths, 1931-34. (a) Place of death of mother in pregnancy and childbirth (1) from sepsis, (2) from other causes.
    Place of deathDeaths from sepsisDeaths from other causesTotal
    AbortionOtherAbortionOther
  • Page 22
    (b) Age-distribution of maternal deaths.
    Cause of deathAge group
    15—20—25—30—35—40—45—Not knownTotal
  • Page 22
    Table 27. London*—Maternal deaths among married women per 1,000 live births (1) after abortion, (2) other deaths ; also still.births and neo.natal deaths per 1,000 live births among married women, 1931—1.
    Metropolitan boroughMaternal deaths per 1,000 live.birthsStill.births and deaths under one week per 1,000 live.birthsPercentage of maternal deaths occurring in
    From abortionFrom all other causesStill.birthsDeathsHospitals and institutionsNursing homes or at home
  • Page 23
    The seasonal incidence, as shown by the notifications (uncorrected for errors of diagnosis) received in successive four-weekly periods during the year was as follows:— Table 28.
  • Page 24
    The following statement shows the age and sex incidence of the cases of food poisoning notified during the year:— Table 29.
    Age0.5.15.21.35.45.55.65.Total
  • Page 24
    The causes of illness in the 490 notified cases were stated to be as follows:—
  • Page 24
    The annual death.rates from pulmonary and non.pulmonary tuberculosis in recent years are shown in the subjoined table:— Table 30.
    PeriodPulmonary tuberculosis death.ratesNon.pulmonary tuberculosis death.rates
    MalesFemalesTotalMalesFemalesTotal
  • Page 25
    Table 31.
    Form of tuberculosis notifiedSexNumber of formal primary notifications of new cases of tuberculosisTotal notifications
    0-1.6.10.15.20.25.35.45.55.65 +Total all ages
  • Page 25
    In addition to the primary cases shown in the above table, a number of cases came to the knowledge of medical officers of health otherwise than by notification. These figures include cases not notified until after death:— Table 32.
    Form of tuberculosis notifiedSexNew cases of tuberculosis coming to knowledge otherwise than by formal notification
    0.1.5.10.15.20.25.35.45.55.65 +Total
  • Page 25
    The sources of information as to the unnotified cases shown in the above table were as follows:— Table 33.
    Source of informationNumber of cases
    PulmonaryNon .pulmonary
  • Page 26
    Table 34.
    Metropolitan boroughs in topographical orderCases on notification register at beginning of 1935Cases added to register during registration year. Brought to knowledge byCases removed from register during the registration yearCases on notification register at end of 1935
    NotificationOtherwiseCured, removed, etc.DeathsTotalPer 1,000 of population
  • Page 27
    Table 35--County of London- Age distribution of primary notifications of tuberculosis according to localisation of disease, 1933 and 1934-
    Age groupRespiratory systemSpineHipKneeOther limbs bones and jointsAbdo- minalPeripheral glandsOther sitesTotal
    LungsOther
  • Page 28
    Table 36.—County of London. Age distribution of primary notifications of tuberculosis according to source of notification, 1933 and 1934. Tuberculosis of the respiratory system, 1933 and 1934.
    Age groupDispensaryHospitalPrivatePoor-lawTotal
  • Page 28
    Other forms of tuberculosis, 1933 and 1934.
  • Page 29
    Table 37. Vital statistics for the metropolitan boroughs and the County ot London in the year 1935. (Rates .per 1.000 of population )
    Metropolitan boroughs arranged in topographical orderEstimated resident population 1935Live birthsDeathsInfant mortality (per 1,000 live births)MeaslesScarlet feverDiphtheriaWhooping coughTyphoid feverDiarrhoea and enteritis, age 0.2 (per 1,000 live births')Pulmonary tuberculosisPneumoniaOther resp. dis.CancerMaternal mortality (per 1,000 live births)Notifications of infectious disease
    Scarlet feverDiphtheriaTyphoid feverErysipelasCerebrospinal feverAcute pneumonia
  • Page 30
    Table 38.—County of London—Principal causes of death by sex and age, 1935.
    Causes of deathSexAll Ages0—1—2—5—15—25—35—45—55—65—75—
  • Page 31
    Table 38—continued.—County of London—Principal causes of death by sex and age, 1935.
    Causes of deathSexAll Ages0—1—2—5—15—25—35—45—55—65—75—
  • Page 32
    Table 39.—County of London.—Principal vital statistics, 1891.1935.
    PeriodAnnual rate per 1,000 livingMortality per 1,000 livingAnnual mortality per 1,000 live births
    Live birthsMarriagesDeaths (all causes)Cerebrospinal feverDiphtheriaEnteric feverScarlet feverSmallpoxWhooping. coughMeaslesInfluenzaTuberculosisPneumonia (all forms)BronchitisOther resp. diseasesHeart diseaseCancerDiabetesInfants 0—1Diarrhoea and enteritis 0—2Puerperal feverOther acc. of ch. birth
    Pulmo. naryNon.pulmonary
  • Page 33
    Table 40.—County of London.—Notifiable infectious diseases.—Notifications per 1,000 of population.
    PeriodAnnual rated per 1,000 living
    AnthraxCerebrospinal feverContinued feverDiphtheriaDysenteryEncephalitis lethargicaEnteric feverErysipelasMalariaOphthalmia neonatorum (per 1,000 live births)PneumoniaPolioencephalitisPoliomyelitisPuerperal fever (per 1,000 live births)Puerperal pyrexia (per 1,000 live births)Scarlet feverSmallpoxTyphus
  • Page 33
    Table 41.—County of London.—Annual number of notifications of infectious disease, 1926.35.
    YearAnthraxCerebrospinal feverContmued feverDiphtheriaDysenteryEncephalitis lethargicaEnteric feverErysipelasMalariaOphthalmia neonatorumPneumoniaPolioencephalitisPoliomyelitisPuerperal feverPuerperal pyrexiaScarlet feverSmallpoxTyphus
  • Page 34
    Table 42.—County of London.—Notifications of infectious disease during the 52 weeks ended 28th December, 1935.
    Metropolitan boroughs in topographical orderAnthraxCerebro. spinal fever.Continued feverDiphtheria (including membranous croup)DysenteryEncephalitis lethargicaEnteric feverErysipelasMalariaOphthalmia neonatorumPneumoniaPolio- encephalitisPolio. mvelitisPuerperal feverPuerperal pyrexiaScarlet feverSmallpoxTyphusp
  • Page 37
    It has not been possible to obtain particulars from all firms, etc., visited, but information as set out in the following statement has been secured:— Table 43
    FirmWashFatBonesFat and bonosFish offalBread, etc.
  • Page 39
    As an indication of the quantity of rags dealt with, the following information obtained from several firms in London is of interest:—
    Firm.Weight of rags purchasedFirmWeight of rags purchased.
  • Page 40
    As an indication of the quantity of bottles dealt with, the following information obtained from five firms in London is of interest:—
    FirmNumber of bottles purchasedFirmNumber of bottles purchased
  • Page 40
    No merchant dealing exclusively in scrap metals has been interviewed, but as an indication of the quantities dealt with, the following information from four firms of rag and metal merchants in London is of interest:—
    FirmWeight of metals purchasedFirmWeight of metals purchased
  • Page 41
    Extensive plant has been installed at these works and, in addition to ash and breeze, the following articles were salvaged during the year ended 31st December, 1935.
    TonsValue £
  • Page 42
    the result of such sampling during 1935, as compared witd work done in 1934, is as follows:— Table 44.
    Quarter19341935
    Completed examinationsNo. tuberculousPercentageCompleted examinationsNo. tuberculousPercentage
  • Page 42
    Table 45.
    DepartmentApproximate stock at 31st December, 1935Visits by veterinary surgeonSamples taken of which examination completedSamples found to be tuberculousCows with tuberculosisCows with unhealthy conditions not tuberculous
    CowsBullsYoung stock
  • Page 43
    In addition to the special samples, 226 routine samples were taken, the examination of 11 of which was incomplete and of the remainder the results were:—
    QuarterTotal completedNo. positive
  • Page 44
    A summary of the work done by the hospitals lor each of the areas in the joint, scheme during the year 1935 is shown in the following table:— Table 47
    LondonMiddlesexEssexSurreyKentHertsBucksEast HamWest HamCroydonTotal"Other places"Grand total
  • Page 44
    The distribution of new cases of venereal disease between the sexes is shown in the following table, the figures for the preceding years being given for comparison :— Table 48.
    YearNew casesTotal venereal cases
    SyphilisSoft chancreGonorrhoea
    M.F.M.F.M.F.M.F.
  • Page 45
    The age and sex distribution was as follows:— Table 49.
    Under 1 year1 and under 5 years5 and under 15 years15 years and overTotal
  • Page 45
    Comparative figures for the nmeteen years during which the scheme has been n force are shown in the following table:— Table 50.
    YearNew casesTotal attendances (venereal and non.venereal)In.patients days
    VenerealNon.venerealTotal
  • Page 46
    Another point worthy of note is the total number of examinations made of pathological specimens. Comparative figures for the nineteen years are shown in the following table:—
    YearFrom treatment centresFrom medical practitionersYearFrom treatment centresFrom medical practitioners
  • Page 48
    The following pages (pp. 48.60) indicate the operation of the tuberculosis scheme during the year 1935. Table 51—Beds occupied at end of year.
    YearAdultsChildrenTotalYearAdultsChildrenTotal
  • Page 48
    The numbers of applications for residential treatment during each of the last five years were as follows:— Table 52
    YearFor first period of treatmentEx. serviceFor further treatmentTotal
    Ex. serviceCivilian adultsChildrenCivilian adultsChildren
    MaleFemaleMaleFemale
  • Page 49
    Patients recommended for treatment during 1935 were dealt with as follows :—
  • Page 49
    The extent of residential treatment and observation is shown below :— Table 53.
    ClassificationIn institutions on 1st January, 1935Admitted during the yearDischarged during the yearDied in institutionsIn institutions on 3lst December, 1935
  • Page 49
    The distribution of patients in institutions on 31st December, 1935, is shown below, the figures for 1934 being given in brackets:— Table 54.
    Hospitals and institutionsEx-service menCivilian adultsChildren under 16 yearsTotal
  • Page 50
    The following table shows the results of observation of doubtfully tuberculous cases discharged from observation hospitals :— Table 55.
    Diagnosis on discharge from observationFor pulmonary tuberculosisFor non-pulmonary tuberculosisTotal
    Stay under 4 weeksStay over 4 weeksStay under 4 weeksStay over 4 weeks
  • Page 50
    Table 56.—Immediate results of treatment. Adults.
    ClassificationQuiescent YearsNot quiescent YearsDied in institution YearsTotals Years
  • Page 51
    Continued from previous page...
    Children
    ClassificationQuiescent YearsNot quiescent YearsDied in institution YearsTotals Years
  • Page 51
    The average numbers of patients under the scheme at Papworth and Preston Hall, respectively, during the past eight years are shown below :— Table 57.
    10281029193019311032103310341035
  • Page 52
    Table 58.
    ClassificationTotalPercentage ulive five years after dischargePercentage dead
  • Page 52
    The mortality records are as follows, the figures in brackets referring to year's enquiry into the 1928 cases :— Table 59.
    ClassificationTotalPercentage alive five years after dischargePercentage dead
  • Page 52
    The mortality rates of the non-pulmonary cases classified according to the location of the disease are as follows :— Table 60.
    Location of diseaseTotalPercentage alive five years after dischargePercentage dead
  • Page 54 55
    Table 61.—Tuberculosis Dispensaries.—Analysis of Returns, January-December, 1935.
    Metropolitan BoroughOn dispensary register. 1-1-35Transferred during 1935 from other areas and cases returned after dischargeExamined for first time during 1935 (a) New cases excluding contacts (b) Contacts (printed in italics)Total number (including contacts) under dispensary supervision during 1935Removed from dispensary register during 1935.On dispensary register 31-12-35Total attendancesVisits to home for dispensary purposes byNo. of specimens of sputum ex aminedNo. of X ray examinationsNumber of T.B. 4- cases on dispensary register
    Definitely tubercularDiagnosis not confirmedPulmonaryNonpulmonaryDiagnosis not confirmedNontuberculousTotal(a) He- covered, (b) Non tubercular (printed in italics)(«) Transferred to other areas or lost sight of (6) Died (printed in italics)Definitely tubercularDiagnosis not completed
    AdultsChildrenAdultsChildrenAdultsChildrenAdultsChildrenAdultsChildrenTuberculosis officersNurses or health visitors
  • Page 56
    The following is a summary, for purposes of comparison, of certain sections of the foregoing table :— Table 62.
    Metropolitan boroughDeaths from tuberculosisRatio of cases on dispensary register to cases on notification registerNumber per 100 deaths from tuberculosis in the boroughTotal attendances per case on registerTuberculosis officers' visits per case on registerTotal consultations per case on registerNurses' visits per case on registerX-rav examinations
    ActualPer 1,000 inhabitantsDefinitely tuberculous per. sonson dispensary register.T.B ‡ cases on dispensary registerExaminationsper 100 new cases and contactsper 100 new cases
    New cases.Contacts
    AdultsChildren
  • Page 57
    Table 63. Males. Class T.B. plus.
    Previously known caseAge group of new casesTotal
    RelationshipClinical classification0-1516-2021-2526-3031-40Over 40No.Percentage
  • Page 58
    Continued from previous page...
    Previously known caseAge group of new casesTotal
    RelationshipClinical classification0-1516-2021-2526-3031-40Over 40No.Percentage
  • Page 60
    Table 65.
    SexSource of notificationFeeblemindedImbecileIdiotMorally defectiveNot defectiveTotal
    ChildrenAdultsChildrenAdultsiChildrenAdultsChildrenAdultsChildrenAdultsChildrenAdults
  • Page 61
    The following table contains particulars of applicants for registration or training under the provisions of the Blind Persons Act, 1920 :— Table 66.
    DescriptionRegistration of the blindTraining of the blindTotal
    m.f.m.f.
  • Page 66
    During the year 10,375 examinations, including 253 home visits, members of the staff. These may be classified as follows :—
  • Page 66
    Ninety applicants for appointment to the permanent service failed to pass the medical examination for the following reasons :—
  • Page 66
    As a result of the examinations of the staff, 404 officers were deemed to be permanently unfit to carry out their ordinary duties in the service of the Council on the following grounds :—
  • Page 68
    The total number of samples examined in 1935 amounted to 18,747. The following table shows their classification :—
  • Page 68
    The following table shows the classification and the results of the an oils:—
    SatisfactoryUnsatisfactory
  • Page 71
    which do not come within the purview of the City Corporation or Port Sanitary Authority. The results of the analyses were :
  • Page 75
    Table 67. County of London.— Statistics of the administrative work carried out by the Metropolitan Borough Councils during the year 1935.
    Sanitary authorityCowshedsSlaughterhousesOffensive tradesSmoke nuisancesCommon lodging housesCleansing of persons and roomsWater supplyMilk-shopsIce cream premisesRestaurants and eating houses
    No. licensedNo. of inspectionsNo. licensedNo. of inspectionsNo. authorisedNo. of inspectionsObservationsIntimationsComplaintsNoticesHouses licensedNo. of inspectionsPersonaRooms or premisesTenement houses extra supplyNo. on registerNo. of inspectionsNo. on registerNo. of inspectionsNo. of placesNo. of inspections
    AdultsChildrenAfter infectious diseasesFor vermin
  • Page 76
    Table 68.
    BoroughNo. of housesPublic Health ActHousing Acts 1925-1935
    No. of houses in-spectedon account of complaints or illnessNo. of statutory notices servedNo. of houses repairedNo. of houses inspectedHousing Art 1930Housing Act 1935No. of houses for working classes erected during the yearUnderground roomsHouses let in lodgings
    In boroughOccupied by the working classesSection 1Sections 17 & 18 No. of houses repairedNumber of houses demolishedClosing OrdersRe-development schemes by owners
    No. of houses representedNo. of houses demolishedby ownersBy L.A.Section 19VoluntarilyNo. madeNo. deter minedNo. of housesNo. of certificates issuedNo. occupied but unfitNo. closed or modified occupation approvedNo. in boroughNo. of inspectionsNo. of prosecutionsNo. of complaints remedied
  • Page 77
    Table 69—Sanitauy Inspectors, 1935.
    Sanitary authorityPopulation (Census) 1931MaleFemaleHealthvisitors
    Whole timeFart timeWhole timePart timeWhole timePart time
  • Page -
    Table 1—Assessment of nutrition, 1935.
  • Page -
    Table 2—Assessment of nutrition, 1934.
  • Page -
    Table 3—Clothing and footgear—Percentages.
    Age group.1934.1935.
    Good.Fair.Bad.Good.Fair.Bad.
  • Page -
    Table 4.
    Ago group.1924.1927.1933.1934.1935.
    Sound.Serious decay.Sound.Serious decay.Sound.Serious decay.Sound.Serious decay.Sound.Serious decay.
  • Page -
    Table 5.
    Age group.Visual acuity (percentages) 1935.
    Normal.Slight defect.More serious defect.
  • Page -
    Table 6.
    Sex.Number.Nutritional classification.
    1234
  • Page -
    The number of children tested during the year was 28,038, and the total number of individual tests was about 40,000. The percentage of children who failed was 7.8. These particulars are shown in the following table:— Table 7.—Routine audiometer tests.
    School.Total number tested.Total number of children failed.Number failed inPercentage of failures (either ear).
    One ear.Both ears.
  • Page -
    Table 8.
    Total ears.Number of ears showing level of correct recording in decibels.
    —3 to 6.9.12 to 18.21 to 30+.
  • Page -
    Table 10.—Shoreditch mUrition centre.
    Number of children.Under 5s.5s. to 8s.8s. to 10s.Over 108.1 person per room.1—2 persons per room.2—3 persons per room.Over 3 persons per room.Regular work.Casual work.No work.Dead.Pensioned off.Employed.Unemployed.1 Dead.
  • Page -
    The following is a summary of the recommendations made at all the centres and the results :—
    Recommendation.Made.Carried out.
  • Page -
    Table 11 First Re-inspections, 1935. (Percentages are given in italic type.)
    Defect treated.No. of defects.Treated.Untreated.
    By private doctor.Under Council's scheme.At other hospitals.Dis-charg'dImproved For observation only.Still needing treatment.
    Dis-charg'dNot dis-charg'dDis-charg'dNot dis- charg'dDia-charg'dNot dis-charg'd
  • Page -
    Second Re-inspections, 1935.
  • Page -
    Table 12.
    Year.Vision.Nose and throat.Minor ailments.Dental.
  • Page -
    Table 13.
    Year.Number of children inspected.Number found to require treatment.Percentage.
  • Page -
    Table 14.-Ear,nose and throat,excluding pure hardness of hearing.
    Classification.Patients.Ears.
  • Page -
    Table 15.—Hard of hearing cases. Organisers' returns from special ear, nose and throat clinics.
    Classification.Patients.Ears.
  • Page -
    Table 16—Special ear clinics—totals for all clinics.
    Cause of suppuration.Total ears.Cured.Referred for mastoid operation.Lapsed.Stilt under treatment.
  • Page -
    Table 17.
    Year.No. of spectacles ordered.No. of spectacles obtained.Percentage.
  • Page -
    Table 18.
    Particulars.193319341935
  • Page -
    Table 19.—Admissions to special hospitals and convalescent homes during 1935.
    Hospital or home.Rheumatism and/or chorea with no apparent cardiac involvement.Rheumatism or chorea with cardiac disease.Rheumatism and/or chorea with no apparent cardiac involvement.Rheumatism or chorea with cardiac disease.Total.
  • Page -
    Table 20.—Recommendations on discharge as to future education.
    Hospital.p.d. school.Elementary school.Totally unfit.Under or over school age.Transfers.Total.
  • Page -
    Table 21.—Rheumatism supervisory centres.
    Name of rheumatism supervisory centre.Number of children attending during 1935.Number of new cases.Attendances of old cases.Total attendances.Average number per session.Number of children from the centre who received hospital treatment or convalescence under the rheumatism scheme.
  • Page -
    Table 22.—Census of chronic invalids, November, 1935, and the four preceding years.
    Ailment.Cases.Percentage of total.
    1931.1932.1933.1934.1935.1931.1932.1933.1934.1935.
  • Page -
    Infectious diseases in schools. The numbers of cases of infectious illness reported by head teachers as occurring among children on the rolls of the day elementary schools during 1935, compared with similar figures reported during the preceding six years, are shown below:— Table 23.
    Year.Diphtheria.Scarlet fever.Measles and German measles.Whooping-cough.Chicken-pox.Mumps.Scabies.Ophthalmia.
  • Page -
    Special investigations into the occurrence of the infectious diseases specified in the following table were carried out by the school medical staff during the year:— Table 24.
    Division.Diphtheria.Scarlet fever.
    Number of visits.Number of depts. visited.Number of children examined.Number of visits.Number of depts. visited.Number of children examined.
  • Page -
    These four groups may be classified in order of proportionate presence of of diphtheria bacilli as follows:— Table 25.
    Group.Number.Diphtheria bacilli present inPercentage positivePercentage virulent
  • Page -
    On arrival 11 cases were found to be positive and 12 negative. The following is an analysis of these cases:— Table 26.
    Result.Positive on arrival. (8 operations.)Negative on arrival.Total.
  • Page -
    The following table shows the number of cases of ringworm of the scalp among the children in the Council's schools dealt with during 1935 compared with the ten preceding years:— Table 27.
    Year.New cases.Cured cases.Cases outstanding at the end of the year.Percentage of cures effected by X-ray treatment.
  • Page -
    The following is a summary of the progress of the work during 1935 :— Table 28.
    Classification.Residential schools and children's homes.Residential special schools.Approved schools.
  • Page -
    The position in each of these schools since active immunisation commenced is set out in the following tables:— Table 29.—(a) Mayford approved school. Accommodation, 150. Ages 9-15 (males).
    Year1933.1934.1935.
  • Page -
    (b)Shirley residential Shcool Accommodation, 600. Age, 2-16(make and female)
    Year1934.1935.
  • Page -
    In both schools immunisation began at a time when scarlet fever was prevalent. A comparison of the incidence of the disease before and after immunisation is provided by the following figures:— Table 30.
    Year.Mayford.Year.Shirley.
  • Page -
    Table 31.—Shirley residential school.
    Months.
    0-1- 2-3-4-5-6- 7-8-9-10-11-12+
  • Page -
    Council have continued their excellent work. The following table gives the roll of these schools in December, 1935:—
    Boys.Girls.Total.
  • Page -
    The following school journeys were made during the year, through the ordinary school journey organisation:— Table 32.
    School.Period.Place visited.No. of children.
    FromTo
  • Page -
    The numbers of children passing through the residential convalescent camp schools during 1935 were : boys, 2,833; girls, 1,504; total, 4,337. In detail the numbers were:—
    Provided, schools:—Boys.Girls.
  • Page -
    The figures concerning dental and nursing treatment are again most interesting:—
  • Page -
    are thus immensely increased. In the year ending September, 1935, 5,998 children were sent for convalescence.
    Institution.No. of beds.No. of children convalescent during the year ended September, 1935.
  • Page -
    The number of individual children on free meals in December in the years 1933, 1934 and 1935 were as follows:— Table 33.
    Meal.1933.1934.1935.
  • Page -
    Table 34.
    Defect.Number nominated.Suitable for admission toReturned to elementary school.Invalided as for the time unfit for any school.Notified under M.D. Acta.
  • Page -
    The following statement shows the nature of the conditions found among the children certified as suitable for admission to schools for the physically defective at the admission examinations during the year :— Table 35.
    Morbid conditions.Boys.Girls.Total.
  • Page -
    Table 36.
    Morbid conditions.Elementary school.Invalided
  • Page -
    attendance and for similar reasons. As a result of the rota examinations the following re-classifications took place:— Table 37.
    Transferred from schools forRe-classified for transfer to—
    P.D. school.M.D. school.Partially sighted school.Blind school.Deaf school.Partially deaf school.Open- air school.Epileptic colony.Swanley.
  • Page -
    There were also 617 cases returned, on improvement, to elementary schools, or, when over 14 years of age, deemed to be no longer certifiable. The details are as follow:— Table 38.
    Action taken.Special school classification.
    P.D.M.D.Blind.Partially sighted.Deaf.Partially deaf.Total.
  • Page -
    The following table classifies the children who improved to such an extent that they were able to return from the schools for physically defective children to the ordinary elementary schools, or were " no longer certifiable " as defective between the ages of 14 and 16 years:— Table 39.
    Morbid conditions.Cases deemed no longer certifiable.Cases deemed fit to return to elementary schools.
  • Page -
    The following table shows the number of cases notified by the education authority under section 2 (2) of the Mental Deficiency Act, 1913, as amended by the Mental Deficiency Act, 1927, during the year 1935 (the figures in brackets being those for the previous year):—
    (a) Feeble-minded—Boys.Girls.
  • Page -
    Table 40.
    Classification.Male.Female.Total.Grand total under headings.
  • Page -
    The following statement shows the numbers dealt with by each court during the year; together with the corresponding total number dealt with by the court in 1930
    Name of court.Number dealt with.Name of court.Number dealt with.
  • Page -
    The following statement shows the charges in detail and the totals under each heading, together with the corresponding total for 1930 :—
    Offences.1935.1930.Offences.1935.1930.
  • Page -
    Physical condition. 1 = Good, 2 = Fair, 3 = Bad.
    Condition.PercentageDefects.Percentage
  • Page -
    The following statement shows the sources of reference of the cases, and the reasons for reference :—
    Source of reference.Reasons for reference.
  • Page -
    The results obtained were as follows:—
    Cases closed—
  • Page -
    The following statement shows the sources of reference of the cases and the reasons for reference :—
    Source of reference.Reasons for reference.
  • Page -
    The results of treatment were as follows :—
    Cases closed —
  • Page -
    The sources of reierence and reasons for reference were as follows :—
    Source of reference.Reasons for reference.
  • Page -
    The results obtained were as follows:—
    Cases closed —
  • Page -
    During the year 1935 the number of children from the Council's schools dealt with at the Institute of Medical Psychology (Tavistock clinic) was 68, of which number 40 were boys and 28 girls. The age distribution was : from 4 to 7 years, 12 ; 7 to 10 years, 25 ; 10 to 14 years, 22 ; 14 years and over, 9.
    Source of ReferenceReason for Reference
  • Page -
    The results obtained were as follows:—
  • Page -
    The following statement shows the source of reference of the cases, and the reasons for reference :—
    Source of reference.Reasons for reference.
  • Page -
    The results obtained were as follows :—
    Cases closed —
  • Page -
    The following statement shows the source of reference of the cases and the reasons for reference :—
    Source of ReferenceReason for Reference
  • Page -
    The results obtained are as follows:—
    Cases discharged—
  • Page -
    Provided by the London County Council.
    Accommodation.
  • Page -
    Aided by the London County Council.
  • Page -
    The following is a statistical summary of medical examinations and treatment at the 15 nursery schools which were open throughout the year 1935 :—
  • Page -
    Table 41.
    Defects.For observation.Referred for treatment.*Treated.Percentage treated of those referred.
  • Page -
    The following are the statistical returns relating to the experiment lor the calendar year 1935 :— Table 42.—Medical inspection.
    Day Continuation school. (Number of institutes—3.)
  • Page -
    Table 43.—Re-inspection.
    Defect.Satisfactorily treated.Under treatment.Further treatment required.Not treated.
  • Page -
    Table 44.
    Sex.Number examined in detail.Nutrition.Clothing.Skin and hair.Teeth.Vision.Number wearing glasses.Various other defects found.
    Excellent.Normal.Below normal.Bad {i.e., malnutrition.)Good.Fair.Poor.Clean.Dirty.Pediculi present.Sound.Less than four decayed.Four or more decayed.Normal.Slightly subnormal.Treatment required.
  • Page -
    The boys covered four age groups :—
    Age.Athletes.Non-athletes
  • Page -
    Table 45.
    Age.Athletic boys.Non-athletic boys.
    Kilos.Centimetres.Kilos.Centimetres
  • Page -
    Table 46.
    Classification.11—12 years.12—13 years.13—14 years.14—15 years.
    Kilos.Cms.Kilos.Cms.Kilos.Cms.Kilos.Cms.
  • Page -
    There is the usual variation which is always found when small groups are being compared.
    Age. group.Anerley.Number of boys.Leytonstone.Anerley.Height (without boots).Leytonstone.
    Ashford.Hutton.Ashford.Hutton.
    ft.ins.ft.ins.ft.ins.ft-ins.
  • Page -
    Continued from previous page...
    Age. group.Anerley.Number of boys.Leytonstone.Anerley.Height (without boots).Leytonstone.
    Ashford.Hutton.Ashford.Hutton.
    ft.ins.oz.ft.ins.ft.ins.ft-ins.oz.
  • Page -
    The investigation included 3,244 secondary school children, as follows :—
    Fee payers.Scholars.
  • Page -
    The average heights and weights were:— Table 47.
    Age.Boys.Girls.
    Scholars.Fee-payers.Scholars.Fee-payers.
    Height.Weight.Height.Weight.Height.Weight.Height.Weight.
  • Page -
    The following is an index of articles on special aspects of subjects in recent annual reports of the school medical officer :—
    Subject matter.Page number of report for the year.
    1920.1930.1931.1932.1933.1934.
  • Page -
    Continued from previous page...
    Subject matter.Page number of report for the year.
    1929.1930.1931.1932.1933.1934.
  • Page -
    Table 48.
    Status.Number examined.Number fit.Number rejected.Number who withdrew after being referred for remediable defects or were not due for reexamination until 1936.
    MaleFomaleMaleFemaleMaleFemaleMaleFemale
  • Page -
    STATISTICAL TABLES. Table I.—Medical Inspection, 1935. (a) Routine Inspections.
    Group.Boys.Girls.Total.
  • Page -
    (b) Other Inspections.
  • Page -
    (c) Children found at routine medical inspection to require treatment (excluding uncleanliness and dental disease).
    Age group.Inspected.Found to require treatment.Percentage requiring treatment.
  • Page -
    Table II. (1) Defects found at medical inspections of all children except those aged 8 years. Elementary and special schools.
    Disease or defect.Routine inspections— Defects.Special inspections— Defects.
    Requiring treatment.Requiring observation.Requiring treatment.Requiring observation.
    Elementary schools.Special schools.Elementary schools.Special schools.
  • Page -
    (a) (2). Defects found at medical inspections of children aged 8 years. Elementary and special schools.
    Disease or defect.Routine inspections—
    Requiring treatment.Requiring observation.
    Elementary schools.Special schools.Elementary schools.Special schools.
  • Page -
    Table II (cont.). (a) Classification of the nutrition of children inspected during the year in the routine age groups.
    Age Group.Number of children inspected.A (Excellent).b (Normal).C (Slightly Sub-normal).D (Bad.)
    No.PercentageNo.PercentageNo.PercentageNo.Percentage
  • Page -
    Table III. (a) Exceptional children in London in 1935.
    Classification.At certified special schools.At public elementary schools.At other institutions*At no school or institutionTotal.
  • Page -
    (6) Return of children suffering from more than one defect, 1935.
    Defect.Type of School.At other institutions (Gen. hosp., etc.)At no schl.Total
    Day M.D.Residential M.D.Residential blindDay deafResidential deafEpileptic colonyDay P.D.Certified hospital schls.
  • Page -
    Table IV. Treatment table. (a) Group I.—Minor ailments, excluding uncleanliness, for which set group V.
    Disease or defect.Defects treated or under treatment.
    Under Council's scheme.Otherwise.Total.
  • Page -
    (6) Group II.—Dejeclive vision and squint (excluding eye defects treated as minor ailments, for which see group I).
    Disease or defect.Defects dealt with.
    Under Council's scheme.Otherwise.Total.
  • Page -
    (c) Group III.—Treatment of defects of the throat and nose. Number of defects.
    Defect.Received operative treatment.Total.Received other forma of treatment.Total number treated.
    Under Council's scheme.Private practitioner or hospital.
  • Page -
    (d) Gboup IV.—Dental defects.
    1.Number of children who wore:—
  • Page -
    (e) Group V.—Uncleanliness and verminous conditions.
  • Page -
    Table V. Medical inspection.—Number of children examined, 1924-1934.
    YearRoutine examinations.Special examinations.Re-inspections.Examinations at special enquiries into outbreaks of infectious disease.Special ear inspection centre attendances.Rheumatism supervisory centre attendances.
  • Page -
    Table VI. Medical treatment.—Number of cases treated under the Council's scheme and by other agencies, 1924-1934.
    YearMinor ailments.†Vision.Nose and throat.Dental.
    Under the Council's scheme.Otherwise.Under the Council's scheme.Otherwise.Under the Council's scheme.Otherwise.Under the Council's scheme.Other wise. *
  • Page -
    Table VII. Medical inspection of students in higher education institutions, 1934.
    Classification.Council secondary schools.Other secondary schools.Council and other junior tech. schools.Training colleges.Total.
    Boys.Girls.Boys.Girls.Boys.Girls.Male.FemaleMale.Female