London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

London County Council 1935

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for London County Council]

This page requires JavaScript

49
The Council, in November, 1935, decided that the members of the staffs employed
at the residential establishments for children should be given the opportunity of
being immunised against diphtheria if they so desired. The officers and employees
concerned are being asked whether they wish to be immunised.
Active
immunisation
against
scarlet fever.
Active immunisation against scarlet fever is being carried out at two of the
Council's residential schools—Mayford approved school and Shirley residential
school.

The position in each of these schools since active immunisation commenced is set out in the following tables:—

Table 29.—(a) Mayford approved school. Accommodation, 150. Ages 9-15 (males).

Year1933.1934.1935.
Average number in residence143146145
Tested for susceptibilityWhole school41*53*
Refusals101*1*
Number (and percentage) of susceptibles found8 out of 51† (15.7 per cent.)11 (26.8 per cent.)7 (13.2 per cent.)
Negative after 5 injections68†101157
Negative after further injection(s)212
Cases of scarlet fever occurring in the school2 (not tested)00

* Represents new admissions.
† These figures relate to 8 susceptibles out of 51 tested for whom complete records were kept.
Complete records were not kept of the remaining 92 children tested in 1933.
(b) Shirley residential school.
Accommodation, 600. Ages, 2-16 (males and females).

(b)Shirley residential Shcool

Accommodation, 600. Age, 2-16(make and female)

Year1934.1935.
Average number in residence520530
Tested for susceptibility442159
Refusals913
Number (and percentage) of susceptibles found63 (14.3 per cent.)27 (17 per cent.).
Negative after 5 injections3763827
Negative after further injection(s)1814
Left before completion of course85
Cases of scarlet fever—
(a) Among those not tested or immunised*46
(6) Among those in the scheme :
(i) Before completion of course of injections10
(ii) After completion of course of injections01 (11 months later)
(iii) Negative after preliminary test10

* Including parental refusals and those for whom parental consent had not been received.

In both schools immunisation began at a time when scarlet fever was prevalent. A comparison of the incidence of the disease before and after immunisation is provided by the following figures:—

Table 30.

Year.Mayford.Year.Shirley.
19323193235
1933Jan. to April 9193341
1934January ... 2
Immunisation began—Immunisation began—
23rd May:1st February:
2 (not immunised)6 (one "immune" after preliminary test).
19340
19350
19357 (one returned as "immune" after completion of course of injections).