London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

London County Council 1935

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for London County Council]

This page requires JavaScript

The following is a summary, for purposes of comparison, of certain sections of the foregoing table :—

Table 62.

Metropolitan boroughDeaths from tuberculosisRatio of cases on dispensary register to cases on notification registerNumber per 100 deaths from tuberculosis in the boroughTotal attendances per case on registerTuberculosis officers' visits per case on registerTotal consultations per case on registerNurses' visits per case on registerX-rav examinations
ActualPer 1,000 inhabitantsDefinitely tuberculous per. sonson dispensary register.T.B ‡ cases on dispensary registerExaminationsper 100 new cases and contactsper 100 new cases
New cases.Contacts
AdultsChildren
Battersea126.85.97635313457751044.3.37.374.425.435.4
Bermondsey1081.05.897583014191682624.5115.363.363.6128.9
Bethnal Green63.63.581,1444336841801204.9.20.334.468.999.3
Camberwell192.82.808714003511731893.5.35.355.555.2112.2
Chelsea41.72.897493049531361637.1.15.3011.0100.8132.5
Peptford89.9.7355529643858774.5.36.176.737.048.5
Finsbury54.5.608123773641031624.7.37.565.044.076.1
Fulham128.89.43585268528111875.9.591.183.937.651.8
Greenwich78.81.8267832357198884.5.26.565.790.0119.5
Hackney139.66.678973875011851254.4.25.832.352.484.9
Hammersmith119.93.766733183282151863.0.37.974.624.354.0
Hampstead38.2.5157330232886784.2.08.465.545.268.0
Holborn30.5.70753393153103932.9.27.484.441.093.5
Islington222.3.596103163321131075.9.28.484.746.978.0
Kensington89.49.837073224021581742.9.10.373.418.233.2
Lambeth218.78.586272923551531314.7.621.323.292.6166.8
Lewisham147.66.6466338424655863.1.39.484.920.832.8
Paddington88.63.69892839001381357.9.51.316.225.833.7
Poplar130.90.735973344092052187.6.75.378.225.652.1
St. Marylebone72.78.4957229026768755.6.32.254.730.546.9
St. Pancras139.75.63505289279114824.6.05.276.829.850.8
Shoreditch76.86.428183525781431685.9.25.224.528.143.2
Southwark146.93.414162492041031034.8.56.356.418.837.8
Stepney170.80.881,0144673821381843.3.11.103016.430.2
Stoke Newington39.77.715463003481971415.6.361.536.530.259.6
Wandsworth249.72.6655332238773753.5.631.243.016.823.2
Westminster70.56.4493530052164903.7.11.575116.521.4
Woolwich136.93.906472425181881485.9.461.345.658 596.6
London (excluding City)3,196.76.666933274121291314.6.39.584.742.569.3

Tuberculosis
contact
scheme.
The tuberculosis contact scheme was put into operation on 1st April, 1925,
and provides:—
(a) for the removal of children from heavily infected and overcrowded homes
occupied by a member of the family suffering from advanced tuberculosis ;
(b) for the boarding.out of children who cannot otherwise be satisfactorily
provided for while their mothers are undergoing residential treatment for
tuberculosis.
With regard to (b), it is also found that the boarding-out of children is sometimes
necessary in cases where the patient is a widower.
The scheme is carried out through the Invalid Children's Aid Association,
who secure suitable homes, make all arrangements for the admission and discharge
of children referred to them by the county medical officer of health, and keep them
under supervision during the time they are boarded out. The Association also
arrange for the homes to be periodically inspected.
The scheme continued to operate satisfactorily during 1935 with the co-operation
of the Association.
There were 226 applications during 1935, concerning 369 children, of whom 252
were accepted, the remaining 117 being withdrawn or regarded as unsuitable. At the
end of the year 107 children were being maintained under this scheme.
The total number of children dealt with (252) is an increase over that for the
previous year (246). The number still being cared for at the end of the year (107)
is 33 less than the previous year's figure.
Reference was made in last year's annual report (pp. 51-53) to an investigation
conducted by Dr. F. J. Bentley, divisional medical officer, as to the proportion of
cases of tuberculosis in which there had been known intimate association with a
" Contact "
investigation