London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report tables

Shoreditch 1928

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Shoreditch]

Published
1929
Pages
181
Tables
68

This page requires JavaScript

68 tables in this report

  • Page 2
    Statistical Summary, 1928.
  • Page 4
    Vital Statistics of the Borough of Shoreditch during 1928 and previous years.
    Year. 1Population estimated to middle of each year. 2Births.Total Deaths Registered in the District.Transferable Deaths.Nett Deaths belonging to the District.
    Uncorrected Number. 3Nctt.Number. 6Rate. 7of Nonresidents registered in the District. 8of residents not registered in the District. 9Under 1 year of Age.At all Ages.
    Number. 4Rate. 5Number. 10Rate per 1,000 nett Births. 11N umber. 12Rate. 13
  • Page 5
    ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF LONDON AND SHOREDITCH BIRTH AND DEATH RATES FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 ST DECEMBER, 1928.
    DISTRICTS.Estimated Population 1928.ANNUAL RATE PER 1,000 PERSONS LIVING.Infants under 1 year. Death rate per 1.000 Live Births.PERCENTAGE TO TOTAL DEATHS.
    BIRTHS.DEATHS DURING THE YEARS:DEATHS DURING 1928 EROMInquest Cases.Deaths in Public Institutions.Uncertified Causes of Death.
    1 (cols 2-8)2345678910
    Smallpox.Measles.Scarlet Fever.Diphtheria.Whooping Cough.Fever.Diarrhœa Enteritis (under 2 year:Tuberculous Disease,Violence.
    1925.19261927.1928Principal Zymotic Diseases.
  • Page 6
    For the purposes of this report 100,200 is the estimated population for the year under consideration. The population in the various Wards of the Borough is estimated as follows :—
    Ward.Population.Area in acres*Density per acre.
  • Page 6
    BIRTHS.
    Males.Females.Total.
  • Page 6
    The distribution of the corrected births and the birth rates in the eight Wards of Borough are given below:—
    Ward.Males.Females.Total.Births per 1,000 Population.
  • Page 7
    During recent years the corresponding figures have been as follows:—
    Year.No. of marriages.Marriage rate.
    Shoreditch.London.
  • Page 7
    The distribution of the deaths and the death rates in the different Wards are given below:—
    Ward.Males.FemalesTotal.Deaths per 1,000 population.Deaths of infants under 1 year per 1,000 births registered.
  • Page 8
    The causes of deaths at all ages together with Ward distribution and particulars relating to 1 the deaths in Public Institutions in the Borough is contained in the following table:—
    Causes of Death.AGES.DEATHS IN EACH WARD.SEX.Total.Belonging to Shoreditch.Not belonging to Shoreditch.Belonging to Shorditch.Not belonging to Shoreditch.Belonging to Shoreditch.Not belonging to Shoreditch.Belonging to Shoreditch.Not belonging to Shoreditch.belonging to Shoreditch.Not belonging to Shoreditch.Belonging to Shoreditch.Not belonging to Shoreditch.
    Under 1.1 to 22 to 55 to 1010 to 1515 to 20.20 to 25.25 to 35.35 to 45.45 to 5555 to 65.65 to 7575 to 85.85 and upwards.Moorfields.Church.Hoxton.Wenlock.Whitmore.Kiagsland.Haggerston.Acton.Male.Female,
    Holborn Institute.St. Leonard's Hospital.Royal Chest Hospital.Home of Good Shepherd.Convent Hospital.Infant Welfare Centre.
  • Page 9
    Deaths of Infants under one year per 1,000 births registered: —
    Year.England and Wales.London.Shoreditch.
  • Page 10
    INFANTILE MORTALITY IN THE BOROUGH DURING YEAR 1928.
    CAUSES OF DEATH.AGES.DEATHS IN EACH WARD.SEX.
    Under 1 day.1 day-1 week1-2 weeks.2-3 weeks.3-4 weeks.Total under 1 month.1-3 months.3-6 months.6-9 months.9-12 months.Total under 1 year.Moorfields.Church.Hoxton.Wenlock.Whitmore.Kingsland.Haggerston.Acton.Male.Female.
  • Page 11
    The particulars of these deaths are entered in the following table:—
    MATERNAL MORTALITY.AGES.Married.Single.Widowed.WARDS.
    15 to 20 yrs.20 to 25 yrs.25 to 30 yrs.30 to 35 yrs.35 to 40 yrs.40 to 45 yrs.45 yrs.Moorfields.Church.Hoxton.Wenlock.Whitmore.Kingsland.Haggerston.Acton.
  • Page 13
    DEATHS FROM CANCER IN THE BOROUGH DURING YEAR 1928.
    AGES.SEX.Total.WARDS.
    0 to 15.15 to 20.20 to 25.25 to 35.35 to 45.45 to 55.55 to 65.65 to 75.75 to 85.85 and upwards.Male.Female.Moorfields.Church.Hoxton.Wenlock.Whitmore.Kingsland.Haggerston.Acton.
  • Page 14
    In the subjoined table are set forth the various institutions outside Shoreditch with the number of persons belonging to the Borough dying therein:—
    Asylums:—No. of Deaths.No. of Deaths.
  • Page 16
    The following table shows the numbers of cases of infectious disease (tuberculosis excluded) notified in the Borough, together with distribution as to quarter, age and Ward:—
    NUMBER OF CASES NOTIFIED.
    NOTIFIABLE DISEASE.1st Quarter2nd Quarter3rd Quarter4th QuarterTotalAGES.WARDS.Cases removed to Hospital.Diagnosis revised subsequently.Deaths.
    IIIIIIIVVVIVIIVIII
    Under 1 year.1 to 5.5 to 15.15 to 25.25 to 45.45 to 65.65Moor-fields.Church.Hoxton.Wenlock.Whitmore.Kingsland.Haggerston.Acton.
  • Page 17
    SMALLPOX—CASES NOTIFIED.
    England & Wales.London.Shoreditch
  • Page 18
    SCARLET FEVER.
    Wards.No. of cases.Fatal cases.Rates per 1,000 population.Case mortality. Deaths per 100 cases.
    Male.Female.Total.Male.Female.Total.
    AttackDeath
  • Page 19
    The number of cases, the deaths amongst males and females and the attack, death and mortality rates in the Borough, its Wards and in London are given in the subjoined table:—
    Ward.Notifications.Fatal cases.Rates per 1,000 population.Case mortality. Deaths per 100 cases.
    M.F.TotalM.F.Total
    AttackDeath
  • Page 20
    Home enquiries were made regarding 437 of the notifications received. Amongst these the age distribution was found to be as follows:—
    Age period.Male.Female.Total.
  • Page 21
    A comparison between London and Shoreditch is contained in the following table:—
    Per 1,000 inhabitants.Deaths per 100 cases.
    Attack rate.Death rate.
  • Page 22
    A comparison between London and Shoreditch during the last 10 years is contained in the following table:—
    London.Shoreditch.
    Year.Cases.Cases per 1,000 births.Deaths.Deaths per 1,000 births.Cases.Cases per 1,000 births.DeathsDeaths per 1,000 births.
  • Page 23
    The disease, which, if not properly treated, may cause blindness or serious impairment of vision, is due to a gonorrheal infection of the child's eyes during birth. Infection is nearly always from the genital tract and the mother should accordingly also undergo treatment.
    Cases.Vision unimpairedVision impaired.Total blindness.Deaths.
    Notified.Treated at home.In Hospital.
  • Page 26
    As will be seen from the following table, measles is a disease which tends to become widespread every few years, the probable explanation being that after a bad measles year a large number of children are protected by reason of the fart that they have had the disease.
    DeathsDeath rate per 1,000 population
    YearShoreditchLondonShoreditchLondon
  • Page 27
    The death rate from this disease was 0.05 per 1,000 inhabitants. The deaths in London as a whole numbered 396, the death rate being 0.09. The number of deaths in Shoreditch in recent years have been as follows:—
    Year.Deaths.Year.Deaths
  • Page 27
    The number of deaths in Shoreditch during recent years has been as follows:—
    Year.Deaths.Year.Deaths.
  • Page 28
    During the last three years the deaths and death rate from influenza in London as a whole have been as follows:—
    Number of deaths.Deaths per 1,000 population.
  • Page 28
    The particulars of these exclusions from school are as follows:—
    Disease from which suffering or to which exposed.Number of exclusions from School.
  • Page 30
    NURSING LIST. Subjoined is a list of cases nursed for the Shoreditch Borough Council by the Shoreditch and Bethnal Green District Nursing Association during the year 1928.
    Disease.Under 5.Visits.Disease.Over 5.Visits.
  • Page 32
    PUBLIC HEALTH (TUBERCULOSIS) REGULATIONS, 1912. Summary of Notifications during the Period from the 1st January, 1928, to the 29tii December, 1928, in the Metropolitan Borough of Shoreditch.
    Age-periods.Notifications on Form A.Notifications on Form B.Number of Notifications on Form C.Number of Notifications on Form D.
    Number of Primary Notifications.Total Notifications on Form A.Number of Primary Notifications.Total Notifications on Form B.Poor Law Institutions.Sanatoria.Poor Law Institutions.Sanatoria.
    0 to 1.1 to 5.5 to 10.10 to 15.15 to 20.20 to 25.25 to 35.35 to 45.15 to 55.55 to 65.65 and upwards.Total Primary Notifications.Under 5.5 to 10.10 to 15.Total Primary Notifications.
  • Page 33
    The number of persons notified per 1,000 inhabitants during the year under consideration, and the preceding nine years is shown in the following table:—
    Year.Pulmonary.Non-Pulmonary.All forms.
  • Page 33
    The number of cases notified in each of the eight wards during 1928 was as follows:—
    Ward.Pulmonary.Non-Pulmonary.Total.No. per 1,000 inhabitants.
  • Page 33
    PUBLIC HEALTH (TUBERCULOSIS) REGULATIONS, 1924.
    Pulmonary.Non-Pulmonary.Total.
    Males.Females.Males.Females.
  • Page 34 35
    DEATHS FROM TUBERCULOSIS IX THE BOROUGH DURING YEAR 1928. The deaths from Tuberculosis during 1928 are classified as to situation of disease, age and ward in the following table:—
    AGES.DEATHS IN EACH WARD.SEX.TOTAL.DEATHS.
    Under 1 year.1 to 2 years.2 to 5 „5 to 10 „10 to 15 ,,15 to 20 ,,20 to 25 „25 to 35 „35 to 45 ,,45 to 55 ,,55 to 65 ,,65 to 75 ,,75 In 85 „Moorfields.Church.Hoxton.WenlockWhit more.Kingsland.HaggcrstonActon.Male.Fermle.Not in Institutions.St. Leonards.Otner Institutions.
    Belonging to Shoreditch.Not belonging to Shoreditch.Belonging to Shoreditch.Not belonging to Sho.'editch.Belong ng to Shoreditch.Not belonging to Shoreditch.
  • Page 34 35
    The death rates from Pulmonary and Non-Pulmonary Tuberculosis for 1928 in London and Shoreditch are compared in the following table:—
    Deaths per 1,000 population.Percentage of total mortality caused by Tuberculosis.
    PulmonaryNon-PulmonaryAll formsPulmonaryNon-PulmonaryAll forms
  • Page 34 35
    The death rates from all forms of Tuberculosis in Shoreditch and London during the last 10 years are compared in the following table:—
    Year.Shoreditch.London.
  • Page 38
    STATISTICAL REPORT FOR 1928.
    1927.1928.
  • Page 38
    All New Persons Examined according to monthly Returns:—
    Tuberculous.Suspects.NonTuberculous.Total.
  • Page 39
    Final Analysis of all New Persons attending:—
    Under 15 years.Over 15 years.Total
    M.F.M.F.
  • Page 39
    SPECIAL SESSION FOR SCHOOL CHILDREN. The number of Attendances and Examinations made each month are shown in the following table:—
    Attendances.Examinations.Attendances.Examinations.
  • Page 39
    Analysis of all persons attending the Dispensary during 1928:—
    Under 15 years.Over 15 years.Totals.
  • Page 40
    The New Persons examined and the Examinations and Attendances each munti were as follows:—
    New Persons Examined.Examinations.Attendances.
    Ins.NonIns.Total.Ins.NonIns.Total.Ins.NonIns.Total.
  • Page 42
    TABLE I.—INSPECTION AND TREATMENT OF CHILDREN.
    Number examined.Number needing treatment.Number refusing treatment.Number treated.Number of extractions.Number of Administrations of Anesthetics.Number of fillings.Number of other operations.Number of children treated for orthodontics.Number of visits.
    Local.General.
  • Page 42
    TABLE II.—INSPECTION AND TREATMENT OF ADULTS.
    Number of patients examined.Number of patients treated.Number of extractions.Number of Administrations of Anaesthetics.Number of lillings, including root fillings.Number of scalings.Number of other operations.Number of dentures fitted.Number of repairs to dentures.Number of crowns.Number of visits.
    Local.General.
  • Page 43
    TABLE III.
    Total ttendances.No. of M. & C. W. cases.AnæSthetic Sessions attendances.
  • Page 43
    The remissions being 25, 50, 75 and 100 per cent, in accordance with the following income limits approved by the Council:—
    No., in family:No. charge to be made.To pay 25% of maximum.To pay 50% of maximum.To pay 75% of maximum.
  • Page 44
    PUBLIC HEALTH (LONDON) ACT, 1891. SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS DURING 1928. TABLE VII.
    PREMISES.NUMBER OF PLACES—Number of inspections, 1928.Number of notices, 1928.Number of prosecutions 1928.
    On register at end of 1927.Added in 1928.Removed in 1928.On register at end of 1928.
  • Page 46
    Summary compiled from the Abstracts of the work of the Sanitary Inspectors by the Senior Inspector, for the Year 1928.
    Insp. Wright.Insp. Chapman.Insp. Sickelmore.Insp. Thomas.Insp. Shaw.Insp. Molloy.Insp. Bishop.Insp. Girling.Insp. Stratton.Insp. Grant.Insp. Walker.Insp. Gibbs.Totals.
  • Page 55
    The particulars of inspections made by the Sanitary Inspectors are as follows:-
    Premises.Inspections.Number of
    Written Notices.Prosecutions.
    (1)(2)(3)(4)
  • Page 55
    The defects found and dealt with were as follows:-
    Particulars.Number of Defects.Number of Prosecutions.
    Found.Remedied.Referred to H.M. Inspector.
  • Page 57
    The following is a summary of the lists received from employers in the Borough :
    NATURE OF WORK.OUTWORKERS' LISTS, SECTION 107.Outwork in unwholesome premises, Section 108.Outwork in infected premises, Sections 109 and 110.
    Lists received from Employers.Notices served on Occupiers as to keeping or sending Lists.Prosecutions.Instances.Notices served.Prosecutions.Instances.Orders made. (S. 109.)Prosecutions. (S. 109, 110.)
    Twice in the Year.Once in the Year.Failing to keep or permit inspection of Lists.Failing to send Lists.
    Lists.Outworkers.Lists.Outworkers.
    Contractors.Workmen.Contractors.Workmen.
    (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)
    Wearing; apparel:-
  • Page 58
    Communications were received from various sanitary authorities relating to some 1,489 outworkers for firms outside Shoreditch and as 21 of these were residents in other Boroughs, their addresses were forwarded to the authorities concerned. The following table shows the numbers of addresses of outworkers received from the sanitary authorities referred to during 1928.
    DISTRICTS.Making Wearing Apparel.Confectionery Packing.Artificial Flowers.Furniture and Upholsterv.Fur Pulling.Feather Sorting.Umbrellas, &c.Paper bags and Boxes.Brush Making.Fancy Leather Goods.Card Mounting.Crackers and Toys.Totals.
    Feb.Aug.Feb.Aug.Feb.Aug.Feb.Aug.Feb.Aug.Feb.Aug.Feb.Aug.Feb.Aug.Feb.Aug.Feb.Aug,Feb.Aug.Feb.Aug.
  • Page 61
    Statistical summary relating to children admitted :—
  • Page 63
    SCHOOL ENTRANTS, 1928.
    Boys.Girls.Total.
  • Page 64
    Those due to puerperal fever are shown separately from those due to other diseases and accidents associated with child birth, but it should be remembered that many cases of puerperal fever have their origin in the " accidents " of childbirth :—-
    Year.England and Wales.London.Shoreditch.
    Deaths from Sepsis, per 1,000 live births.Deaths from other diseases and accidents of Pregnancy.Total.Deaths from Sepsis, per 1,000 live births.Deaths from other diseases and accidents of Pregnancy.Total.Deaths from Sepsis, per 1,000 live births.Deaths from other diseases and accidents of Pregnancy.Total.
  • Page 65
    the conduct of normal labour followed by nursing care during the puerperium. The following figures show the nature of the attention received by Shoreditch mothers who are confined in their own homes. Of 1,000 cases investigated, 751 or 75.1 per cent. were confined in their own homes :—
    Cases Confined at Home.Cases.Percentage.
  • Page 66
    Ante-natal Care.— The necessity for ante-natal care of every pregnant woman is becoming now generally recognised. Of the 1,000 cases here under consideration, the following table shows the number receiving ante-natal examination (as distinct from "booking " or interview) :—
    Cases.Percentage.
  • Page 67
    Of the 1,000 confinements under consideration the numbers examined ante-natally at the following Centres were :—
  • Page 69
    Particulars of the Health Visitors' visits and of the attendances at the various Welfare Centres during the year are given in the following tables :— Annual Report for Year 1928. VISITS.
    Health Visitors' Districts.
    1.2.3.4.5.6.7.Total.
  • Page 70
    NUMBER OF FIRST ATTENDANCES OF INFANTS AND CHILDREN AT WELFARE CLINICS.
    Health Visitors' Districts.
    1.2.3.4.5.6.7.Total.
  • Page 71
    TOTAL ATTENDANCES OF INFANTS AND CHILDREN AT WELFARE CLINICS.
    Health Visitors' Districts.
    1.2.3.4.5.6.7.Total.
  • Page 72
    TOTAL ATTENDANCES OF INFANTS AND CHILDREN AT WELFARE CLINICS— Continued.
    Health Visitors' Districts.
    1.2.3.4.5.6.7.Total.
  • Page 72
    ANTE-NATAL CONSULTATIONS.
  • Page 73
    CHILD WELFARE CONSULTATIONS.
    Health Visitors, District No.Infants seen by Doctor.Children (1-5 yrs.) seen by Doctor.
    For 1st timeTotal No.For 1st time.Total No.
  • Page 73
    REPORT ON INFANTS ATTENDING DOCTORS' CONSULTATIONS. Health Visitors' Districts.
    1.2.3.4.5.6.7.Total.
  • Page 75
    In order to arrive at conclusions as to benefit derived from Light Treatment, the cases treated have been classified according to the following table.
    A1A2A3B1B2B3C1C2C3DTotal.
  • Page 79
    The results of the year's work are summarised in the following Table:—
    Quarter of 1928.Number of Samples taken.Number of Samples Adulterated.Percentage Adulterated.Number of Prosecutions Instituted.Prosecutions withdrawn because of Warranties, etc.Prosecutions Proceeded withNumber of Successful Prosecutions.Fines and Costs.Amount paid to Analyst for Samples Analysed.
  • Page 80
    In the subjoined table are shown the number of samples of milk taken during the four quarters of the year, with the numbers and percentages of those not found to be genuine:—
    Quarter of the year.Number of Samples.Number not genuine.Percentage adulterated.
  • Page 81
    The subjoined table gives a comparison of the results of the work under the Sale of Food and Drugs Acts for the years 1904.1928 inclusive:—
    Year.Number of Samples.Number of persons in the Borough to each Sample.Number of Samples adulterated.Percentage of Samples adulterated.Number of prosecutions instituted.Summonses withdrawn on account of warranties.Prosecutions proceeded with.Number of successful prosecutions.Fines and Costs.Amount paid to Public Analyst.