London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report tables

Hints from the Health Department. Leaflet from the archive of the Society of Medical Officers of Health. Credit: Wellcome Collection, London

Hackney 1932

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Hackney]

Published
1933
Pages
129
Tables
126

This page requires JavaScript

126 tables in this report

  • Page 13
    Comparative Table, Year 1932.
    Estimated Population.Birth-rate.Death-rate.Infantile Mortality Rate.
  • Page 14
    The following table shows the estimated population and density of population of London, Hackney and each of the Electoral Wards and Registration Sub-Districts of the Borough:—
    District.Estimated Population.Acreage (Land and Inland Water).Persons per Acre.
  • Page 15
    REGISTER OF RAINFALL DURING THE YEAR AT CLAPTON POND.
    Month.Total rainfall.No. of days on which rain fell.Heaviest fall.
  • Page 15
    EXTRACTS FROM VITAL STATISTICS OF THE YEAR
    Live Births:—Total.M.F.
  • Page 15
    Deaths from diseases and accidents of pregnancy and childbirth:—
    DeathsRate per 1,000 Total Births
  • Page 15
    Death-rate of Infants under one year of age per 1,000 live births:—
  • Page 16
    The following table gives the number of marriages and marriage-rates for the Borough of Hackney and London during the years 1922-32:—
    Year.Borough of Hackney.London.
    Marriages.Marriage rate.Marriage rate.
  • Page 17
    Distributed according to sex and legitimacy the births were as follow:—
    Male.Female.Total.
  • Page 17
    The following table shows the births and birth-rates for the year in the Borough and the various Electoral Wards:—
    District.Births.Birth-rates.
  • Page 17
    The number of births and the birth-rates in England and Wales, London and Hackney, in 1932, together with the rates for the previous four years are shown below:—
    District.1932.Birth-rates in previous years.
    No. of Births.Birth-rate.1931.1930.1929.1928.
  • Page 18
    The following table shows the sources from which the notifications of births (corrected and uncorrected) were received:—
    Medical Practitioners.Midwives.Parents and others.Total.
    Live Births.Still Births.Live Births.Still Births.Live Births.Still Births.Live Births.Still Births.
  • Page 19
    Continued from previous page...
    District.1932.Death-rates in previous years.
    No. of Deaths.Death-rate.1931.1930.1929.1928.
  • Page 19
    Death Rates in Parliamentary Districts.
    District.Area (acres).Population (estimated).Death-rate.Infantile Death-rate.
  • Page 19
    The following table shows the deaths and death-rates for the year in the Borough and the various Electoral Wards:—
    District.Deaths.Death-rates.
  • Page 20
    Number of deaths in Institutions within the Borough.
    Name of Institution.Persons belonging to the Borough.Persons not belonging to the Borough.Total Deaths.
  • Page 20
    Mental Hospitals.
  • Page 20
    Hospitals for Infectious Diseases.
  • Page 21
    Continued from previous page...
  • Page 21
    Special Hospitals.
  • Page 21
    Other Institutions.
  • Page 22
    The following is a table of the infantile deaths and death rates in England and Wales, London and Hackney in 1932, together with the infantile death rates in five-year periods.
    District.1932.Infantile Mortality Rates in five year periods.
    Number of deaths of children under 1 year of age.Infantile Mortality Rate.
    1927-311922-6.
  • Page 22
    The following table shows the infant deaths and infantile mortality rates for the year in the Borough and the various Electoral Wards:—
    District.Infant Deaths.Infantile Mortality rate.
  • Page 22
    The causes of death are set out in the following table:—
    Cause of Death.Under 24 hrs.1 day to 1 week.1-2 weeks.2-3 weeks.3-4 weeks.Total under 4 weeks.1 -3 months.3-6 months.6-9 months.9-12 months.Total.
  • Page 23
    The maternal deaths and death-rates in the years 1928 to 1932 in England and Wales, London and Hackney were as follow:—
    1928.1929.1930.1931.1932.
  • Page 24
    VITAL STATISTICS OF WHOLE DISTRICT FOR 1932 AND PREVIOUS YEARS.
    Year. 1Population estimated to middle of each year. 2Births.Total Deaths Registered in the District.Transferable DeathsNett Deaths belonging to the District.
    Uncorrected. Number. 3Nett Number. 4Rate. 5of Non-residents registered in the District. 8of residents not registered in the District. 9Under 1 year of AgeAt all Ages.
    Number. 6Rate. 7
    Number. 10Rate per 1,000 Nett Births. 11Number. 12Rate. 13
  • Page 25
    Payments by the Borough Council to the Association during the year were as follow:—
    £s.d.
  • Page 25
    The following table shows the number of cases attended and the visits paid by the nurses during the year.
    No. of Oases Nursed.No. of Visits Paid.
  • Page 26
    The number of rooms fumigated during each month of the year is set out in the following table:—
  • Page 26
    (b) Articles of Clothing, Furniture, etc.—The number of articles under this head disinfected during last year was 58,651. A table is here given showing details of the articles disinfected during each month of the year.
    Description of Articles.January.February.March.April.May.June.July.August.September.October.November.December.Totals.
  • Page 27
    (c) Articles Destroyed.—In addition to the articles disinfected, there were 931 destroyed on request by the owners. These are set out in the following table:—
  • Page 29
    The following are the schools from which children were sent to the Cleansing Station, with the number of treatments given:—
    Schools.Head Cleansings.Hot Baths.Sulphur Baths.
  • Page 30
    The following table gives particulars of the treatments given to persons who attended at the Cleansing Station during the year.
    January.February.March.April.May.June.July.August.September.October.November.December.Totals.
  • Page 31
    Inquest
    Verdict.Sex.
    Male.Female.
  • Page 31
    Table showing nature of Suicidal and Accidental Deaths in the Borough of Hackney during the year.
    Nature of Suicide.No.Nature of Accidental Death.No.
  • Page 32
    The nearest crematorium to Hackney is installed at the City of London Cemetery, Ilford, and the charges are:—
    £s.d.
  • Page 33
    The following Institutions are subsidised by the London County Council, but not by the Borough Council, and afford, in most instances, accommodation for both married and unmarried mothers:—
    Name and Situation.Nature of Accommodation.By whom provided.
  • Page 34
    CLINICS AND TREATMENT CENTRES.
    Name and Situation.Nature of Accommodation.By whom provided.
  • Page 35
    Continued from previous page...
    Name and Situation.Nature of Accommodation.By whom provided.
  • Page 36
    Continued from previous page...
    Name and Situation.Nature of Accommodation.By whom provided.
  • Page 38
    The following table shows the conditions found at the first visit of the Health Visitor to the homes of infants:—
    No. of Infants visited.Method of Feeding.Separate cot provided for Infant.Use of Comforter.Home conditions.
    Breast.Artificial.Mixed.Yes.No.Yes.No.Satisfactory.Unsatisfactory.
  • Page 39 40
    1. Primary Visits. 2. Total Visits. Visits of Health Visitors, 1932.
    Miss D. Boyce-Jones.Miss I. L. Buckledee.Miss N. Burr.Miss M. Cockle.Miss E. Hamilton.Miss N. V. Hobbs.Miss M. L. Howman.Miss J. D. Kimpsford.Miss S. E. Love.Miss A. Bandies.Mrs. A. Rhodes.Miss A. K. Roche.Miss G. S. Thomas.Miss D. F. Vidal.Miss E. E. Williamson.Eton Mission (voluntary centre).Hackney Grove and Ada Street (voluntary centres).Totals.
    121212121212121212121212121212121212
  • Page 42
    The work done at the Infant Welfare Centres during the year is shown in the following table:—
    Centre.No. of sessions held.No. of children brought to the Centre for the first time.Total No. of attendances.Total No. of attendances of infants and children before Doctor.
    Under 1 year.Over 1 year.Under 1 year.Over 1 year.
  • Page 42
    The following is a table of the work done at the Ante-natal Centres during the year:—
    CENTRES.No. of times Centre open.No. of Expectant Mothers attending (first visits)No. of repeated attendances at Centre.Total attendances.No. of examinations by Doctor.
  • Page 43
    The following scale of charges was adopted by the Council's Maternity and Child Welfare Committee in December, 1930:—
    Income per head of the family per week, after deduction of rent, insurances, etc.Fee to be paid.
  • Page 43
    The following is a summary of the work done at the Clinic during the past five years:—
    19281929193019311932
  • Page 46
    The work done at the Clinic during the period under review was as follows:—
  • Page 46
    The cost of this scheme to the Council during the year was:—
    £s.d.
  • Page 47
    Council under its Maternity and Child Welfare Scheme since the opening of the Clinic at the end of 1925 :—
    Year.No. of Sessions held.No. of Attendances.No. of Extractions.No. of Fillings.No. of other treatments.No. of Persons to whom Dentures were supplied.No. of Dentures supplied.
  • Page 48
    The number of patients assisted under this scheme, together with the cost to the Council during the year, is shown below :—
    Cases.Cost.
    £s.d.
  • Page 49
    In order to facilitate reference, however, a table is given here to show the extent to which the services of the nurses employed by the Hackney District Nursing Association have been utilised during the past year under the Council's Maternity and Child Welfare Scheme:—
    Disease.No. of Cases Nursed.No. of Visits Paid.
  • Page 50
    The following is the scale of income under which grants are made :—
    Income per head of the family after deduction of rent and insurances.Proportion of cost to be borne by the applicant.
  • Page 50
    The following are particulars of the applications received, the assistance granted and the cost of the scheme to the Council during the year :—
    Form of Assistance.No. of Applications.Cost to the Council.
    Received.Granted.
  • Page 51
    Dried Milk, Foods, Medicines, etc., supplied at cost price.
    Description of Article.Value of goods supplied.
    £s.d.
  • Page 51
    Foods, Medicines, etc., supplied free of cost to necessitous mothers.
    Description of Article,Cost to the Council.
    £s.d.
  • Page 53
    Such information was received in 84 cases during the past year, and the homes were inspected with the following results :—
    No. of Homes Inspected.No. of Homes where Rooms alone were found Verminous.No. of Homes where Bedding or Clothes and Rooms were found Verminous.No. of Homes not Verminous.
  • Page 54
    Continued from previous page...
    No. of Homes Inspected.No. of Homes where Rooms alone were found Verminous.No. of Homes where Bedding or Clothes and Rooms were found Verminous.No. of Homes not Verminous.
  • Page 56
    Premises and Occupations (other than Food Premises) Controlled by Statute, By-laws or Regulations.
    No.
  • Page 58
    SUMMARY OF LEGAL PROCEEDINGS DURING 1932.
    InspectorAddress.Coin plaint.Magistrate's Decision.Fine.Costs.
    Public Health (London) Act, 1891.£s.d.£s.d.
  • Page 59
    Continued from previous page...
    Inspector.Address.Complaint.Magistrate's Decision.Fine.Costs.
    £s.d.£s.d.
  • Page 64
    Analysis of Occupations carried on in the Registered Workshops of Hackney. (a) W earing A pparel.
    Occupations.No. of Workshops.Occupations.No. of Workshops.
  • Page 64
    The following tables show the inspections made and the defects found and remedied in the factories and workshops in the Borough :— I.—INSPECTIONS.
    Premises.Number of
    Inspections.Written Notices.Prosecutions.
  • Page 65
    II.—DEFECTS FOUND.
    Particulars.Number of Defects.Number of Prosecutions.
    Found.Remedied.Referred to H.M. Inspector.
  • Page 66
    III.—REGISTERED WORKSHOPS.
    Workshops on the Register (S 131) at the end of the year.Number.
  • Page 66
    IV.—OTHER MATTERS.
    Class.Number.
  • Page 67
    The following analysis shows the trades followed by the outworkers:-
    Trade.No. of Outworkers.Trade.No. of Outworkers.
  • Page 67
    The following is a summary 01 the information secured from these lists during the past year:—
    Residing in the Borough.Residing outside the Borough.Total.
  • Page 69
    v.— HOME WORK.
    Nature of Work.Outworkers' Lists, Section 107.Outwork in Unwholesome Premises, Section 108.Outwork in Infected Premises, Sections 109, 110.
    Lists received from Employers.Notices served on Occupiers as to keeping or sending Lists.Prosecutions.Instances.Notices served.Prosecutions.Instances.Orders made (Section 110).Prosecutions (Sect'0ns 109, 110)
    Twice in the year,Once in the year.Failing to keep or permit inspection of Lists.Failing to send Lists.
    Lists.Outworkers.Lists.Outworkers
    Contractors.Workmen.ContractorsWorkmen.
    12345678910ii1213141516
  • Page 70
    The following summary shows the state of the Registers at the end of 1931, the additions and deletions made during 1932 and the number of entries remaining at the end of 1932:—
    Cowkeepers and Cowhouses.Dairies and Milkshops.Dairymen, including those whose premises are outside the Borough.Purveyors of milk in sealed bottles.
  • Page 71
    Applications were received during the year from the undermentioned dealers, all of whom satisfied the Local Authority that their arrangements for the storage, treatment and distribution of the milk complied with the conditions required:—
    Name and Address of Dealer.Designations of Milk for the sale of which licenses were granted.
  • Page 77
    The weight of the foodstuffs condemned was:—
    Tons.Cwts.Qrs.Lbs.
  • Page 78
    The following is a summary of the food premises in the Borough that are regulated by Statute, together with the number of inspections made:-
    No of premisses.No of inspection made.
  • Page 79
    The samples taken during the year are described in the following table, the results of analyses being also shown
    Description of Article.Formal Samples.Informal Samples.
    Number taken.Number adulteratedNumber taken.Number adulterated
  • Page 80
    Details are given below with regard to the adulterated samples and the action taken by the Council in respect thereof
    Description of Article.Nature and Extent of Adulteration.Action taken.
  • Page 81
    The average composition of the formal milk samples taken in 1932 is shown in the following table in order that a comparison may be made with the standard of genuineness accepted by the Ministry of Agriculture, namely, 3.0 percent. milk fat and 8.5 percent. solids not fat:—
    Months.Number of Formal Samples taken.Average Composition of all Samples.Average Composition of Genuine Samples.
    Percentage of Milk Fat.Percentage of Solids not FatPercentage of Milk Fat.Percentage of Solids not Fat
  • Page 85
    † Table showing the Notifications received, Removals to Hospitals and Deaths from Infectious Diseases (except Tuberculosis) in 1932.
    Disease.Number of Cases Notified.Number of Cases admitted to Hospitals.Number of Deaths.
  • Page 86
    Table showing Notifications of Infectious Disease received in 1932, in Age Groups.
    Disease.At all Ages.At Ages—Years.65 and upwards.
    Under 1.1 to 2.2 to 3.3 to 4.4 to 5.5 to 10.10 to 15.15 to 20.20 to 35.35 to 45.45 to 65.
  • Page 87
    Table showing Notifications of Infectious Disease received in 1932 in Electoral Wards and Registration Sub-Districts.
    Disease.Electoral Wards.Registration Sub-Districts.
    Stamford Hill.West Hackney.Kingsland.Downs.Clapton Park.Homerton.South Hackney.Hackney.North.Central.South-East.South-West.
  • Page 88
    Table showing Age Groups of Deaths from Notifiable Infectious Disease in 1932.
    Disease.Total cases notified.Age Groups of Deaths.Total deaths at all ages.
    Under 1.1 to 2.2 to 3.3 to 4.4 to 5.5 to 10.10 to 15.15 to 20.20 to 35.35 to 45.45 to 65.65 and upwards.
  • Page 89
    VACCINATION. The following schedule shows the names and addresses of the Public Vaccinators and Deputy Public Vaccinators appointed by the Council to carry out the work of vaccination in the Borough:—
    Public Vaccinators' Districts.Name and Address of Public Vaccinator.Name and Address of Deputy Public Vaccinator.
  • Page 89
    The number of successful vaccinations and re-vaccinations performed by the Public Vaccinators and Deputy Public Vaccinators during the year were as follow:—
    Public Vaccinators' Districts.At Surgery or elsewhere other than at Home.At Home.At Institutions .Total.
  • Page 90
    The cases of this disease notified in the Borough in the past six years were as follow:—
    Year.No. of cases notified.
  • Page 91
    Summary of Proceedings under the Vaccination Acts, 1867 to 1907, during the year 1932.
    Registration Sub-District.No. of Cases in Birth Lists received during Year.No. of Certificates of Vaccination received.No. of Certificates of Postponement owing toNo. of Certificates under Section 2 of Vaccination Act, 1898, and No. of Statutory Declarations under Section 1 of the Vaccination Act, 1907.No. of Certificates of Insusceptibility or of having had Smallpox.No. of Cases.No. of Entries in Lists sent to public Vaccinator.
    Health of Child.Condition of House.Prevalence of Infectious Disease.Parents Removed out of District.Otherwise not found.
  • Page 92
    The following table shows the distribution of scarlet fever in the Electoral Wards and Registration Sub-districts of the Borough:—
    Area.No. of cases.Attack-rate per 1,000 living.
  • Page 93
    The following table shows the housing conditions of those persons under 15 years of age who were attacked by scarlet fever during the year:—
    Cases removed to Hospital.Cases nursed at Home.
    Less than 1 person per room.1 to 2 persons per room.More than 2 persons per room.Less than 1 person per room.1 to 2 persons per room.More than 2 persons per room.
  • Page 93
    The following table shows the distribution of diphtheria in the Electoral Wards and Registration Sub-districts of the Borough:—
    Area.No. of cases.Attack-rate per 1,000 living.
  • Page 94
    The following table shows the housing conditions of those persons under 15 years of age who were attacked by diphtheria during the year:—
    Cases removed to Hospital.Cases nursed at Home.
    Less than 1 person per room.1 to 2 persons per room.More than 2 persons per room.Less than 1 person per room.1 to 2 persons per room.More than 2 persons per room.
  • Page 95
    Infants and children from one year of age are treated, and very encouraging results have been obtained, as shown in the following table:—
    Year.Schick Tested.Commenced treatment without Schick Test.Naturally Immune.Immunised.Discountinued treatment and struck off Register.No.Under treatment at end of year.
    Pre School Age.School AgeAdultsPre School Age.School AgeAdults
  • Page 99
    Ophthalmia Neonatorum.—During the year there were :—
    Cases.Vision Unimpaired.Vision Impaired.Total Blindness.Deaths.
    Notified.Treated
    At Home.In Hospital.
  • Page 100
    Table shows the number of cases discovered by the Health Visitors and Sanitary Inspectors, or reported to the Public Health Department by the Teachers of the London County Council schools, doctors requiring nurses for patients, charitable agencies, parents, etc. :—
    Month.No. of Cases which came to notice.
    193219311930
  • Page 102
    The following table gives the distribution of the deaths from this disease in the different Sub.districts of the Borough :—
    Sub.Districts.North.Central.South.west.South.east.
  • Page 102
    Below is given a table showing the number of deaths and death. rates due to malignant disease in this Borough for the 10 years ending 1932 :—
    Years.1923192419251926192719281929193019311932
  • Page 103
    Analysis of the Deaths from Cancer, Malignant Tumour, Sarcoma and other forms of Malignant Disease during the year.
    1—55—1515—2525—35 I35—4545—5555—65—7575—8585—TOTAL
    MFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMF
  • Page 104
    The number of primary notifications received in each year since 1920 is shown in the following table :—
    Year.Pulmonary.Non-Pulmonary.Total.
  • Page 104
    The following is a summary of the age and sex distribution of the cases notified and the deaths from this disease during the year :—
    Age Periods.New Cases.Deaths.
    Pulmonary.Non-Pulmonary.Pulmonary.Non-Pulmonary.
    M.F.M.F.M.F.M.F.
  • Page 105
    The following table shows the age and sex distribution of 95 cases qf tuberculosis which came to notice during the year otherwise than by notification under the Regulations :—
    Age Periods.Pulmonary.Non-Pulmonary.
    M.F.M.F.
  • Page 105
    The sources from which information of these cases was obtained were as follow:—
    Source of Information.No. of Cases.
    Pulmonary.Non-Pulmonary.
  • Page 106
    The total number of cases of both forms of the disease 'which came to notice during the year in the Borough, the Wards and the Registration Sub-districts, together with the attack-rates per 1,000 persons living, is shown in the following table :—
    Area.No. of Cases.Attack rate per 1,000 persons living.
  • Page 106
    The total number of notifications received during the year was :—
    Form A.Form I.Form II.
  • Page 106
    As shown in a foregoing table, the deaths from tuberculosis of Hackney residents registered during 1932 numbered 176. These deaths are classified as follows :—
  • Page 107
    The deaths are distributed in the Sub-districts of the Borough as shown below :—
    Sub-Districts.North.Central.South-West.South-East.
  • Page 107
    The number of deaths from tuberculosis and the death-rate in each year since 1920 are shown in the following table :—
    Year.Pulmonary.Non-Pulmonary.Total.Death-rate.
  • Page 107
    In the following table the deaths from tuberculous disease in the Borough for the last 17 years are shown grouped in periods of three years:—
    Three-year periods.Annual average number of deaths from Tuberculous Disease.Percentage decrease on the period 1916-1918.
  • Page 108
    The following is a summary of the quarterly returns under the Regulations during the year :—
    Pulmonary.Non-Pulmonary.
    Male.Female.Male.Female.
  • Page 109
    New Cases.—The number of new cases seen at the Dispensaries during the year, including contacts of notified cases, was as follows :—
    Dispensary.Males.Females.Totals.
  • Page 109
    The sources through which these cases were sent to Dispensaries were:—
    Source.Dispensary at
    Metropolitan Hospital.City of London Hospital
    Total No.No. found to be tuberculous.Total No.No. found to be tuberculous.
  • Page 110
    The diagnoses made in regard to the new cases examined at the Dispensaries during the year, excluding contacts, were as follow :—
    Diagnosis.Dispensary atTotals.
    Metropolitan Hospital.City of London Hospital
    Adults.Children under 15.Adults.Children under 15.
    M.F.M.F.M.F.M.F.
  • Page 110
    The diagnoses made at the examination of the 455 contacts examined at the Tuberculosis Dispensaries during the year were :—
    Diagnosis.Dispensary atTotals.
    Metropolitan Hospital.City of London Hospital.
  • Page 111
    Bacteriological Examinations.—One thousand, one hundred and fifty-seven specimens of sputum were examined at the Tuberculosis Dispensaries during the year with the following results;—
    Result of ExaminationDispensary atTotals.
    Metropolitan Hospital.City of London Hospital.
  • Page 111
    The following are additional details relating to the work of the Tuberculosis Dispensaries during the year :—
    Dispensary atTotals.
    Metropolitan Hospital.City of London Hospital.
  • Page 112
    The following table shows the various stages which the disease had reached before these patients attended a Tuberculosis Dispensary
    1st Stage.2nd Stage.3rd Stage.
  • Page 112
    The following figures, which relate to the number of persons who died from tuberculosis during the past three years, throw further light upon the matter of the failure of patients to secure medical attention until a late stage of the disease has been reached :—
    193019311932
    Pul.Non-Pul.Pul.Non-Pul.Pul.Non-Pul.
  • Page 113
    Visits by Tuberculosis Visitors.—The following are particulars of the home visits paid in 1932 by the Council's Tuberculosis Visitors :—
    New Cases.Contacts.Sailors and Soldiers.Other Persons.Total.Insured.Non-insured.
  • Page 113
    The number of patients who have received residential treatment under the Act in each year since 1926 is as follows:—
    Year.No. of Patients.No. of Contacts.
  • Page 115
    The number of follows treated, and the gross cost the council in the were
    Hospital.No. of Patients Treated.No. of "Refills" at 10s. 6d.Gross Cost to Council.
    £s.d.
  • Page 115
    The following are details of the cases treated by "Finsen" light and artificial sunlight during the year at the expense of the Council:—
    Hospital."Finsen" Light.Artificial Sunlight.
    No. of Patients Treated.No. of exposures.Cost to Council.No. of Patients Treated.No. of exposures.Cost to Council.
    fs.df,s.d.
  • Page 116
    Home Nursing.—The number of cases of tuberculosis attended and the visits paid by the Nurses of the Hackney District Nursing Association during the past five years are shown below :—
    Year.Cases.Visits.
  • Page 118 119
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1932.
    INSPECTIONS.Mr. Fowler, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew, No. 2 District.Mr. Vobe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District.Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 District.Mr. Long, No. 8 District.Mr. Goldsworthy, No. 9 District.Mr. Calvin, No. 10 District.Mr. Hillier, No. 11 District.Mr. Crook, No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove, No. 13 District.Mr. Rushton, No. 14 District.Mr. Smith, Special.Mr. Brown, Special.Mr. Peverett, Special.Mr. Alexander, Special.Mr. Nighy, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTALS.
  • Page 120 121
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1932.
    INSPECTIONS.Mr. Fowler, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew, No. 2 District.Mr. Vobe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District.Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 District.Mr. Long, No. 8 District.Mr. Goldsworthy, No. 9 District.Mr. Galvin. No. 10 District.Mr. Hillier, No. 11 District.Mr. Crook, No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove, No. 13 District.Mr. Rushton, No. 14 District.Mr. Smith, Special.Mr. Brown, Special.Mr. Peverett, Special.Mr. Alexander, Special.Mr. Nighy, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTALS.
  • Page 122 123
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1932.
    INSPECTIONS.Mr. Fowler, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew, No. 2 District.Mr. Vobe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District.Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 District.Mr. Long, No. 8 District.Mr. Golds worthy, No. 9 District.Mr. Galvin, No. 10 District.Mr. Hillier, No. 11 District.Mr. Crook, No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove, No. 13 District.Mr. Rushton, No. 14 District.Mr. Smith, Special.Mr. Brown, Special.Mr. Peverett, Special.Mr. Alexander, Special.Mr. Nighy, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTALS.
  • Page 124 125
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1932.
    INSPECTIONS.Mr. Fowler, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew, No. 2 District.Mr. Vobe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District.Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 District.Ml-. Long, No. 8 District.Mr. Goldsworthy, j No. 9 District.Mr. Galvin, No. 10 District.Mr. Hillier, No. 11 District.Mr. Crook, No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove, No. 13 District.Mr. Rushton, No. 14 District.Mr. Smith, Special.Mr. Brown, Special.Mr. Peverett, Special.Mr. Alexander, Special.Mr. Nighy, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTALS.
  • Page 126 127
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1932.
    INSPECTIONS.Mr. Fowler, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew, No. 2 District.Mr. Vobe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District.Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 District.Mr. Long, No. 8 District.Mr. Golds worthy, No. 9 District.Mr. Galvin, No. 10 District.Mr. Hillier, No. 11 District.Mr. Crook, No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove, No. 13 District.Mr. Rushton, No. 14 District.Mr. Smith, Special.Mr. Brown. Special.Mr. Peverett, Special.Mr. Alexander, Special.Mr. Nighy, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTALS.
  • Page 128 129
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1932.
    INSPECTIONS.Mr. Fowler, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew, No. 2 District.Mr. Vobe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District.Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 District.Mr. Long, No. 8 District.Mr. Goldsworthy, No. 9 District.Mr. Galvin, No. 10 District.Mr. Hillier, No. 11 District.Mr. Crook, No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove, No. 13 District.Mr. Rushton, No. 14 District.Mr. Smith, Special.Mr. Brown. Special.Mr. Peverett, Special.Mr. Alexander, Special.Mr. Nighy, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTALS.
  • Page 130 131
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1932.
    INSPECTIONS.Mr. Fowler, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew, No. 2 District.Mr. Vobe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District.Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 District.Mr. Long, No. 8 District.Mr. Goldsworthy, No. 9 District.Mr. Galvin, No. 10 District.Mr. Hillier, No. 11 District.Mr. Crook, No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove, No. 13 District.Mr. Rushton, No. 14 District.Mr. Smith, Special.Mr. Brown. Special.Mr. Peverett, Special.Mr. Alexander, Special.Mr. Nighy, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTALS.
  • Page 132
    Summary of Food Premises in the Borough, 1932. (Not Market Streets).
    District Inspectors.Food Inspectors.
    1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.13.14.G. A.W.P.Totals.
  • Page 133
    Short List of Causes of Death at Different Periods of Life of Residents of Hackney during 1932.
    Causes of Death.Sex.All Ages.0—1—2—5—15—25—35—45—55—So—75—
  • Page 134
    Causes of Death—continued.
    Causes of Death.Sex.All Ages.0—1—2—5—15—25—35—45—55—65—75—