London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report tables

Hints from the Health Department. Leaflet from the archive of the Society of Medical Officers of Health. Credit: Wellcome Collection, London

Hackney 1931

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Hackney]

Published
1932
Pages
120
Tables
113

This page requires JavaScript

113 tables in this report

  • Page 15
    Comparative Table , Year 1931.
    Estimated Population.Birth-rate.Death-rate.Infantile Mortality Rate.
  • Page 17
    REGISTER OF RAINFALL DURING THE YEAR AT CLAPTON POND.
    Month.Total rainfall.No. of days on which rain fell.Heaviest fall.
    ins.ins.
  • Page 18
    The following table gives the number of marriages and marriage.rates for the Borough of Hackney and London during the years 1921.31:.
    Year.Borough of Hackney.London.
    Marriages.Marriage rate.Marriage rate.
  • Page 19
    Distributed according to sex and legitimacy the births were as follow:.
  • Page 19
    The following table shows the births and birth-rates for the year in the Borough and the various Electoral Wards:-
    District.Births.Birth.rates.
  • Page 19
    The number of births and the birth-rates in England and Wales, London and Hackney in 1931, together with the rates for the previous four years are shown below:-
    District.1931.Birth-rates in previous years.
    No. of Births.Birth . rate.1930.1929.1928.1927.
  • Page 20
    The following table shows the sources from which the notifications of births (corrected and uncorrected) were received:-
    Medical Practitioners.Midwives.Parents and others.Total.
    Live Births.Still Births.Live Births.Still Births.Live Births.Still Births.Live Births.Still Births.
    M.F.M.F.M .F.M.F.M.F.M.F.M .F.M.F.
  • Page 21
    Continued from previous page...
    District.1931.Death-rates in previous years.
    No. of Deaths.Deathrate.1930.1929.1928.1927.
  • Page 21
    Death Rates in Parliamentary Districts.
    District.Area (acres).Population (estimated).Death-rate.Infantile Death-rate.
  • Page 21
    The following table shows the deaths and death-rates for the year in the Borough and the various Electoral Wards:-
    District.Deaths.Death-rates.
  • Page 22
    Number of deaths in Institutions within the Borough.
    Name of Institution.Persons belonging to the Borough.Persons not belonging to the Borough.Total Deaths.
  • Page 24
    The following is a table of the infantile deaths and death rates in England and Wales, London and Hackney in 1931, together with the infantile death rates in five-year periods.
    District.1931.Infantile Mortality Rates in five year periods.
    Number of deaths of children under 1 year of age.Infantile Mortality Rate.
    1926-30.1921-5.
  • Page 24
    The following table shows the infant deaths and infantile mortality rates for the year in the Borough and the various Electoral Wards :—
    District.Infant Deaths.Infantile Mortality rate.
  • Page 25
    The causes of death are set out in the following table:—
    Cause of Death.Under 24 his.1 day to 1 week.1-2 weeks.2-3 weeks.3-4 weeks.Total under 4 weeks.1-3 months.3-6 months.6-9 months.9-12 months.Total.
  • Page 26
    The maternal deaths and death-rates in the years 1927 to 1931 in England and Wales, London and Hackney were as follow :—
    1927.1928.1929.1930.1931.
  • Page 27
    VITAL STATISTICS OF WHOLE DISTRICT FOR 1931 AND PREVIOUS YEARS.
    Year.Population estimated to middle of each year.Births.Total Deaths Registered in the District.Transferable DeathsNett Deaths belonging to the District.
    Uncorrected. Number.Nett Number.Rate.of Nonresidents registered in the District.of residents not registered in the District.Under 1 year of AgeAt all Ages.
    Number.Rate.Number.Rate per 1.000 NettNumber.Rate.
    12345678910111213
  • Page 28
    Payments by the Borough Council to the Association during the year were as follow:—
    £s.d.
  • Page 28
    The following table shows the number of cases attended and the visits paid by the nurses during the year.
    No. of Cases Nursed.No. of Visits Paid.
  • Page 29
    The number of rooms fumigated during each month of the year is set out in the following table:—
  • Page 29
    (b) Articles of Clothing, Furniture, etc. —The number of articles under this head disinfected during last year was 50,265. A table is here given showing details of the articles disinfected during each month of the year.
    Description of Articles.January.February.March.April.May.June.July.August.September.October.November.December.Totals.
  • Page 30
    (c) Articles Destroyed. —In addition to the articles disinfected, there were 1,224 destroyed on request by the owners. These are set out in the following table :—
  • Page 31
    The following are the schools from which children were sent to the Cleansing Station, with the number of baths given :—
    Schools.Hot Baths.Sulphur Baths.
  • Page 32
    The following table gives particulars of the baths given to persons who were treated at the Cleansing Station during the year.
    January.February.March.April.May.June.July.August.September.October.November.December.Totals.
  • Page 35
    The following Institutions are subsidised by the London County Council, but not by the Borough Council, and afford, in most instances, accommodation for both married and unmarried mothers:—
    Name and Situation.Nature of Accommodation.By whom provided.
  • Page 36
    CLINICS AND TREATMENT CENTRES.
    Name and Situation.Nature of Accommodation.By whom provided.
  • Page 37
    Continued from previous page...
    Name and Situation.Nature of Accommodation.By whom provided.
  • Page 38
    Continued from previous page...
    Name and Situation.Nature of Accommodation.By whom provided.
  • Page 40
    The following table shows the conditions found at the first visit of the Health Visitor to the homes of infants :—
    No. of Infantsvisited.Method of Feeding.Separate cot provided for Infant.Use of Comforter.Home conditions.
    Breast.Artificial.Mixed.Yes.No.Yes.No.Satisfactory.Unsatisfactory.
  • Page 41
    Visits of Health Visitors, 1931.
    Miss D. Boyce-Jones.Miss I. L. Buckledee.Miss N. Burr.Miss M. Chitson.Miss M. Cockle.Miss E. Hamilton.Miss N. V. Hobbs.Miss M. L. Howman.Miss J. D. Kimpsford.Miss S. E. Love.Mrs. A. Rhodes.Miss A. K. Roche.Miss G. S. Thomas.Miss D. F. Vidal.Miss E. E. Williamson.Temporary Visitor.Eton Mission (voluntary centre).Hackney Grove and Ada Street (voluntary centres).Totals.
  • Page 44
    The work done at the Infant Welfare Centres during the year is shown in the following table:—
    Centre.No. of sessions held.No. of children brought to the Centre for the first time.Total No. of attendances.Total No. of attendances of infants and children before Doctor.
    Under 1 year.Over 1 year.Under 1 year.Over 1 year.
  • Page 44
    The following is a table of the work done at the Ante-natal Centres during the year:—
    CENTRES.No. of times Centre open.No. of Expectant Mothers attending first visits.No. of repeated attendances at Centre.Total attendancesNo. of examinations by Doctor.
  • Page 45
    The following scale of charges was adopted by the Council's Maternity and Child Welfare Committee in December, 1930 :—
    Income per head of the family per week, after deduction of rent, insurances, etc.Fee to be paid.
  • Page 45
    The following is a summary of the work done at the Clinic during the past five years:—
    19271928192919301931
  • Page 48
    The work done at the Clinic during the period under review was as follows:—
  • Page 48
    The cost of this scheme to the Council during the year was:—
    £s.d.
  • Page 49
    benefited from the facilities for dental treatment provided by the Council under its Maternity and Child Welfare Scheme since the opening of the Clinic at the end of 1925:—
    Year.No of Sessions held.No. of Attendances.No. of Extractions.No. of Fillings.No. of other treatments.No. of Persons to whom Dentures were supplied.No. of Dentures supplied.
  • Page 50
    The number of patients assisted under this scheme, together with the cost to the Council during the year, is shown below:—
    Cases.Cost.
    £s.d.
  • Page 51
    In order to facilitate reference, however, a table is given here to show the extent to which the services of the nurses employed by the Hackney District Nursing Association have been utilised during the past year under the Council's Maternity and Child Welfare Scheme:—
    Disease.No. of Oases Nursed.No. of Visits Paid.
  • Page 51
    The following is the scale of income under which grants are made:—
    Income per head of the family after deduction of rent and insurances.Proportion of cost to be borne by the applicant.
  • Page 52
    The following are particulars of the applications received, the assistance granted and the cost of the scheme to the Council during the year:—
    Form of Assistance.No. of Applications.Cost to the Council.
    Received.Granted.
    £s.d.
  • Page 52
    Dried Milk, Foods, Medicines, etc., sullied at cost price.
    Description of Article.Value of goods supplied.
    £s.d.
  • Page 53
    Foods, Medicines, etc., supplied free of cost to necessitous mothers.
    Description of Article.Cost to the Council.
    £s.d.
  • Page 55
    Such information was received in 38 cases during the past year, and the homes were inspected with the following results:—
    No. of Homes Inspected.No. of Homes where Rooms alone were found Verminous.No. of Homes where Bedding or Clothes and Rooms were found Verminous.No. of Homes not Verminous.
  • Page 56
    During the period from 1st September to 31st December, 1931, 847 homes were inspected with the following results:—
    No. of Homes Inspected.No. of Homes where Rooms alone were found Verminous.No. of Homes where Bedding or Clothes and Rooms were found Verminous.No. of Homes not Verminous.
  • Page 59
    SUMMARY OF LEGAL PROCEEDINGS DURING 1931.
    Inspector.Address.Complaint.Magistrate's Decision.Fine.Costs.
    Public Health (London) Act, 1891.£s.d.£s.d.
  • Page 60
    Continued from previous page...
    Inspector.Address.Complaint.Magistrate's Decision.Fine.Costs.
    £.s.d.£s.d.
  • Page 61
    Continued from previous page...
    Inspector.Address.Complaint.Magistrate's Decision.Fine.Costs.
    £s.d.£s.d.
  • Page 64
    Analysis of Occupations carried on in the Registered Workshops of Hackney. (a) Wearing A pparel.
    Occupations.No. of Workshops.Occupations.No. of Workshops.
  • Page 64
    The following tables show the inspections made and the defects found and remedied in the factories and workshops in the Borough :— I.—INSPECTIONS.
    Premises.Number of
    Inspections.Written Notices.Prosecutions.
  • Page 65
    II.—DEFECTS FOUND.
    Particulars.Number of Defects.Number of Prosecutions.
    Found.Remedied.Referred to H.M. Inspector.
  • Page 66
    III.—REGISTERED WORKSHOPS.
    Workshops on the Register (S 131) at the end of the year.Number.
  • Page 67
    The following analysis shows the trades followed by the outworkers:—
    Trade.No. of Outworkers.Trade.No. of Outworkers.
  • Page 67
    Employers of outworkers are required to submit to the local Medical Officer of Health twice yearly a list of the outworkers employed by them. The following is a summary of the information secured from these lists during the past year:—
    Residing in the Borough.Residing outside the Borough.Total.
  • Page 69
    V.—HOME WORK.
    Nature of Work.Outworkers' Lists, Section 107.Outwork in Unwholesome Premises, Section 108Outwork in Infected Premises, Sections 109, 110.
    Lists received from Employers.Notices served on Occupiers as to keeping or sending Lists.Prosecutions.Instances.Notices served.Prosecutions.Instances.Orders made (Section 110).Prosecutions (Sections 109, 110)
    Twice in the year,†Once in the year.Failing to keep or permit inspection of Lists.Failing to send Lists.
    Lists.Outworkers.Lists.Outworkers.
    Contractors.Workmen.ContractorsWorkmen.
    12345678910111213141516
  • Page 70
    The following summary shows the state of the Registers at the end of 1930, the additions and deletions made during 1931 and the number of entries remaining at the end of 1931:—
    Cowkeepers and Cowhouses.Dairies and Milkshops.Dairymen, including those whose premises are outside the Borough.Puvey ors of milk in sealed bottles.
  • Page 71
    Applications were received during the year from the undermentioned dealers, all of whom satisfied the Local Authority that their arrangements for the storage, treatment and distribution of the milk complied with the conditions required:—
    Name and Address of Dealer.Designations of Milk for the sale of which licenses were granted.
  • Page 74
    The weight of the foodstuffs condemned was:—
    Tons.Cwts.Qrs.Lbs.
  • Page 74
    The following is a summary of the food premises in the Borough that are regulated by Statute, together with the number of inspections made:—
    No of premises.No. of Inspections made.
  • Page 75
    Continued from previous page...
    No. of Premises.No. of Inspections made.
  • Page 76
    The samples taken during the year are described in the following table, the results of analyses being also shown:-
    Description of Article.Formal Samples.Informal Samples.
    Number taken.Number adulteratedNumber taken.Number adulterated
  • Page 77
    Details are given below with regard to the adulterated samples and action taken by the Council in respect thereof:-
    Description of Article.Nature and Extent of Adulteration.Action taken.
  • Page 78
    The average composition of the formal milk samples taken in 1931 is shown in the following table in order that a comparison may be made with the standard of genuineness accepted by the Ministry of Agriculture, namely, 3.0 per cent. milk fat and 8.5 per cent. solids not fat:—
    Months.Number of Formal Samples taken.Average Composition of all Samples.Average Composition of Genuine Samples.
    Percentage of Milk Fat.Percentage of Solids not FatPercentage of Milk Fat.Percentage of Solids not Fat
  • Page 80
    f Table showing the Notifications received, Removals to Hospitals and Deaths from Infectious Diseases (except Tuberculosis) in 1931.
    Disease.Number of Cases Notified.Number of Cases admitted to Hospitals.Number of Deaths.
  • Page 81
    Table showing Notifications of Infectious Disease received in 1931, in Age Groups.
    Disease.Cases Notified.
    At all Ages.At Ages—Years.
    Under 1.1 to 2.2 to 3.3 to 4.4 to 5.5 to 10.10 to 15.15 to 20.20 to 35.35 to 45.45 to 65.65 and upwards.
  • Page 82
    Table showing Notifications of Infectious Disease received in 1931 in Electoral Wards and Registration Sub -Districts.
    Disease.Electoral Wards.Registration Sub-Districts.
    Stamford Hill.West Hackney.Kingsland.Downs.Clapton Park.Homerton.South Hackney.Hackney.North.Central.South-East.South-West.
  • Page 83
    Table showing Age Groups of Deaths from Notifiable Infectious Disease in 1931.
    DiseaseTotal cases notified.Age Groups of Deaths.Total deaths at all ages.
    Under 1.1 to 22 to 33 to 44 to 55 to 1010 to 1515 to 2020 to 3535 to 4545 to 6565 and upwards.
  • Page 84
    VACCINATION. The following schedule shows the names and addresses of the Public Vaccinators and Deputy Public Vaccinators appointed by the Council to carry out the work of vaccination in the Borough:—
    Public Vaccinators' Districts.Name and Address of Public Vaccinator.Name and Address of Deputy Public Vaccinator.
  • Page 84
    The number of successful vaccinations and re-vaccinations performed by the Public Vaccinators and Deputy Public Vaccinators during the year were as follow:—
    Public Vaccinators' Districts.At Surgery or elsewhere other than at Home.At Home.At Institutions.Total.
  • Page 85
    The cases of this disease notified in the Borough in the past six years were as follow:—
    Year.No. of cases notified.
  • Page 86
    Summary of Proceedings under the Vaccination Acts, 1867 to 1907, during the year 1931.
    Registration Sub-District.No. of Cases in Birth Lists received during Year.No. of Certificates of Vaccination received.No. of Certificates of Postponement owing toNo. of Certificates under Section 2 of Vaccination Act, 1898, and No. of Statutory Declarations under Section 1 of the Vaccination Act, 1907.No. of Certificates of Insusceptibility or of having had Smallpox.No. of Cases.No. of Entries in Lists sent to Public Vaccinator.
    Health of Child.Condition of House.Prevalence of Infectious Disease.Parents Removed out of District.Otherwise not found.
  • Page 87
    The following table shows the distribution of scarlet fever in the Electoral Wards and Registration Sub-districts of the Borough:—
    Area.No. of cases.Attack-rate per 1,000 living.
  • Page 88
    The following table shows the housing conditions of those persons under 15 years of age who were attacked by scarlet fever during the year:—
    Cases removed to Hospital.Cases nursed at Home.
    Less than 1 person per room.1 to 2 persons per room.More than 2 persons per room.Less than 1 person per room.1 to 2 persons per room.More than 2 persons per room.
  • Page 89
    The following table shows the distribution of diphtheria in the Electoral Wards and Registration Sub-districts of the Borough
    Area.No. of cases.Attack-rate per 1,000 living.
  • Page 89
    The following table shows the housing conditions of those persons under 15 years of age who were attacked by diphtheria (luring the year:—
    Cases removed to Hospital.Cases nursed at Home.
    Less than 1 person per room.1 to 2 persons per room.More than 2 persons per room.Less than 1 person per room.1 to 2 persons per room.More than 2 persons per room.
  • Page 90
    Infants and children from six months of age are treated, and very encouraging results have been obtained, as shown in the following table:—
    Year.Schick Tested.Commenced treatment without Schick Test.Naturally Immune.Immunised.Discontinued treatment and struck off Register.No. under treatment at end of year.
    Pre-School Age.School Age.Adults.Pre-School Age.School Age.Adults
  • Page 92
    Ophthalmia Neonatorum. —During the year there were:—
    Cases.Vision Unimpaired.Vision Impaired.Total Blindness.Deaths.
    Notified.Treated
    At Home.In Hospital.
  • Page 92
    The following table shows the number of cases discovered by the Health Visitors and Sanitary Inspectors, or reported to the Public Health Department by the Teachers of the London County Council schools, doctors requiring nurses for patients, charitable agencies, parents, etc.
    Month.No. of Cases which came to notice.
    19311930
  • Page 93
    The following table gives the distribution of the deaths from this disease in the different Sub-districts of the Borough:—
    Sub Districts.North.Central.South west.South-east.
  • Page 94
    Below is given a table showing the number of deaths and death-rates due to malignant disease in this Borough for the 10 years ending 1931:—
    Years.1922192319241925192619271928192919301921
  • Page 94
    Analysis of the Deaths from Cancer, Malignant Tumour, Sarcoma and other forms of Malignant Disease during the year.
    1-55-1515-2525-3535-4545-5555-6565-7575-8585 and upwards.Total.
  • Page 95
    The number of primary notifications received in each year since 1920 is shown in the following table:—
    Year.Pulmonary.Non-Pulmonary.Total.
  • Page 95
    The following is a summary of the age and sex distribution of the cases notified and the deaths from this disease during the year:—
    Age Periods.New Cases.Deaths.
    Pulmonary.Non-Pulmonary.Pulmonary.Non-Pulmonary.
    M.F.M.F.M.F.M.F.
  • Page 96
    The following table shows the age and sex distribution of 89 new cases of tuberculosis which came to notice during the year otherwise than by notification under the Regulations :—
    Age Periods.Pulmonary.Non-Pulmonary.
    M.F.M.F.
  • Page 96
    The sources from which information of these cases was obtained were as follow:—
    Source of Information.No. of Cases.
    Pulmonary.Non-Pulmonary.
  • Page 97
    The total number of cases of both forms of the disease which came to notice during the year in the Borough, the Wards and the Registration Sub-districts, together with the attack-rates per 1,000 persons living, is shown in the following table:—
    Area.No. of Cases.Attack rate per 1,000 personal living.
  • Page 97
    The total number of notifications received during the year was:—
    Form A.Form I.
    Poor Law Institutions.Sanatoria.
  • Page 98
    The deaths are distributed in the Sub-districts of the Borough as shown below:—
    Sub-Districts.North.Central.Soutli-West.South-East.
  • Page 98
    The number of deaths from tuberculosis and the death-rate in each year since 1920 are shown in the following table:—
    Year.Pulmonary.Non-Pulmonary.Total.Death-rate.
  • Page 99
    Continued from previous page...
    Three-year periods.Annual average number of deaths from Tuberculous Disease.Percentage decrease on the period 1916-1918.
    Per cent.
  • Page 99
    The following is a summary of the quarterly returns under the Regulations during the year:—
    Pulmonary.Non-Pulmonary.
    Male.Female.Male.Female.
  • Page 100
    New Cases.— The number of new cases seen at the Dispensaries during the year was as follows:—
    Dispensary.Males.Females.Totals.
  • Page 101
    The sources through which the new cases were sent to Dispensaries were:—
    Source.Dispensary at
    Metropolitan Hospital.City of London Hospital
    Total No.No. found to be tuberculous.Total No.No. found to be tuberculous.
  • Page 101
    The diagnoses made in regard to the new cases examined at the Dispensaries during the year were as follow:—
    Diagnosis.Dispensary atTotals.
    Metropolitan Hospital.City of London Hospital
    Adults.Children under 15.Adults.Children under 15.
    M.F.M.F.M.F.M.F.
  • Page 102
    The diagnoses made at the examination of the 496 contacts examined at the Tuberculosis Dispensaries during the year were:—
    Diagnosis.Dispensary atTotals.
    Metropolitan Hospital.City of London Hospital.
  • Page 102
    Bacteriological Examinations. —One thousand, two hundred and fifty specimens of sputum were examined at the Tuberculosis Dispensaries during the year with the following results:—
    Result of ExaminationDispensary atTotals.
    Metropolitan Hospital.City of London Hospital.
  • Page 103
    The following are additional details relating to the work of the Tuberculosis Dispensaries during the year:—
    Dispensary atTotals.
    Metropolitan Hospital.City of London Hospital.
  • Page 103
    The following table shows the various stages which the disease had reached before these patients attended a Tuberculosis Dispensary:—
    1st Stage.2nd Stage.3rd Stage.
  • Page 104
    The following figures, which relate to the number of persons who died from tuberculosis during the past three years, throw further light upon the matter of the failure of patients to secure medical attention until a late stage of the disease has been reached:—
    192919301931
    Pul.Non-Pul.Pul.Non-Pul.Pul.Non-Pul.
  • Page 104
    Visits by Tuberculosis Visitors. —The following are particulars of the home visits paid in 1931 by the Council's Tuberculosis Visitors:—
    New Cases.Contacts.Sailors and Soldiers.Other Persons.Total.Insured.Non-insured.
  • Page 105
    The number of patients who have received residential treatment under the Act in each year since 1926 is as follows:—
    Year.No. of Patients.No. of Contacts.
  • Page 106
    The number of patients treated and the gross cost to the Council in 1931 were:—
    Hospital.No. of Patients Treated.No. of "Refills" at 10s. 6d.Gross Cost to Council.
    £s.d.
  • Page 106
    The following are details of the cases treated by " Finsen " light and artificial sunlight during the year at the expense of the Council:-
    Hospital."Finsen" Light.Artificial Sunlight.
    No. of Patients Treated.No. of exposures.Cost to Council.No. of Patients Treated.No. of exposures.Cost to Council.
    £s.d.£s.d.
  • Page 107
    Home Nursing. —The number of cases of tuberculosis attended and the visits paid by the Nurses of the Hackney District Nursing Association during the past five years are shown below:—
    Year.Cases.Visits.
  • Page 108 109
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1931.
    INSPECTIONS.Mr. Fowler, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew, No. 2 District.Mr. Vobe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District.Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 District.Mr. Long, No. 8 District.Mr. Goldsworthy, j No. 9 District.Mr. Galvin, No. 10 District.Mr. Hillier, No. 11 District.Mr. Crook, No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove, No. 13 District.*Mr. Alexander, No. 14 District.*Mr. Rushton, No. 14 District.Mr. Smith, Special.Mr. Brown, Special.Mr. Bobbitt, Special.Mr. Peverett, Special.Mr. Nighy, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTALS.
  • Page 110 111
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1931.
    INSPECTIONS.Mr. Fowler, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew, No. 2 District.Mr. Vobe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District.Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 District.Mr. Long, No. 8 District.Mr. Goldsworthy, No. 9 District.Mr. Galvin, No. 10 District.Mr. Hillier, No. 11 District.Mr. Crook, No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove, No. 13 District.*Mr. Alexander, No. 14 District.*Mr. Rushton, No. 14 District.Mr. Smith, Special.Mr. Brown, Special.Mr. Bobbitt, Special.Mr. Peverett, Special.Mr. Nighy, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTALS.
  • Page 112 113
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1931.
    INSPECTIONS.Mr. Fowler, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew, No. 2 District.Mr. Vobe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District.Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 District.Mr. Long, No. 8 District.Mr. Goldsworthy, No. 9 District.Mr. Galvin, No. 10 District.Mr. Hillier, No. 11 District.Mr. Crook, No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove, No. 13 District.*Mr. Alexander, No. 14 District.*Mr. Rushton, No. 14 District.Mr. Smith, Special.Mr. Brown, Special.Mr. Bobbitt, Special.Mr. Peverett, Special.Mr. Nighy, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTALS
  • Page 114 115
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1931.
    INSPECTIONS.Mr. Fowler, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew, No. 2 District.Mr. Vobe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District.Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 District.Mr. Long, No. 8 District.Mr. Goldsworthy, No. 9 District.Mr. Galvin, No. 10 District.Mr. Hillier, No. 11 District.Mr. Crook, No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove, No. 13 District.*Mr. Alexander, No. 14 District.*Mr. Rushton, No. 14 District.Mr. Smith, Special.Mr. Brown, Special.Mr. Bobbitt, Special.Mr. Peverett, Special.Mr. Nighy, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTALS.
  • Page 116 117
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1931.
    INSPECTIONS.Mr. Fowler, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew, No. 2 District.Mr. Vobe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District.Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 District.Mr. Long, No. 8 District.Mr. Goldsworthy, No. 9 District.Mr. Galvin, No. 10 District.Mr. Hillier, No. 11 District.Mr. Crook, No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove, No. 13 District.*Mr. Alexander, No. 14 District.*Mr. Rushton, No. 14 District.Mr. Smith, Special.Mr. Brown. Special.Mr. Bobbitt, Special.Mr. Peverett, Special.Mr. Nighy, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTALS.
  • Page 118 119
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1931.
    INSPECTIONS.Mr. Fowler, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew, No. 2 District.Mr. Vobe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District.Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 District.Mr. Long, No. 8 District.Mr. Goldsworthy, No. 9 District.Mr. Galvin, j No. 10 District.Mr. Hillier, No. 11 District.Mr. Crook, No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove, No. 13 District.*Mr. Alexander, No. 14 District.*Mr. Rushton, No. 14 District.Mr. Smith, Special.Mr. Brown. Special.Mr. Bobbitt, Special.Mr. Peverett, Special.Mr. Nighy, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTALS.
  • Page 120 121
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1931.
    INSPECTIONS.Mr. Fowler, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew, No. 2 District.Mr. Vobe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District.Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 District.Mr. Long, No. 8 District.Mr. Goldsworthy, No. 9 District.Mr. Galvin, ! No. 10 District.Mr. Hillier, No. 11 District.Mr. Crook, No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove, No. 13 District.*Mr. Alexander, No. 14 District.*Mr. Rushton, No. 14 District.Mr. Smith, Special.Mr. Brown. Special.Mr. Bobbitt, Special.Mr. Peverett, Special.fMr. Nighy, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTALS.
  • Page 122 123
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1931.
    Mr. Fowler, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew, No. 2 District.Mr. Vobe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District.Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 District.Mr. Long, No. 8 District.Mr. Goldsworthy, No. 9 District.Mr. Galvin, No. 10 District.Mr. Hillier, No. 11 District.Mr. Crook, No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove, No. 13 District.*Mr. Alexander, No. 14 District.*Mr. Rushton, No. 14 District.Mr. Smith, Special.Mr. Brown, Special.Mr. Bobbitt, Special.Mr. Peverett, Special.fMr. Nighy, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTALS.
  • Page 124
    Short List of Causes of Death at Different Periods of Life of Residents of Hackney during 1931.
    Causes of Death.Sex.All Ages.0—1—2-5-15-25—45—65—75—
  • Page 125
    Causes of Death—continued.
    Causes of Death.Sex.All Ages.0—1—2_5—15—25—45-65—75—