London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report tables

Hackney 1927

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Hackney]

Published
1928
Pages
138
Tables
112

This page requires JavaScript

112 tables in this report

  • Page 18
    Comparative Table, Year 1927.
    Name of Borough.Population.Birthrate.Zymotic Death.rate.Death.rate —all Causes.Infantile Mortality.
  • Page 19
    Table showing Estimated Population, Area and Density of the Registration Sub-Districts in Hackney at middle of 1927.
    NorthCentralSouth-WestSouth -EastTotal for HackneyTotal for London
  • Page 20
    Register of Rainfall during the year at Clapton Pond —1927.
    Month.Total rainfall. ins.No. of days on which rain fell.Heaviest fall. ins.
  • Page 21
    The following table gives the number of marriages and marriage. rates for the Borough of Hackney and London during the years 1917. 1927.
    Year.Borough of Hackney.London.
    Marriages.Marriage rate.
  • Page 22
    NOTIFICATION OF BIRTHS ACT, 1907. Notifications of Births (Live and Still.born) received during the year 1927.
    Year 1927Medical Practitioners.Midwives.Parents and others.Total.
    Live.Still.Live.Still.Live.Still.Live.Still.
    m.f.m.f.m.f.m.Fm.f.m.F.m.f.m.f.
  • Page 22
    The following table gives the number of registered births, birth.rates, etc., for the Sub.districts in the Borough:—
    Registration District of HackneyRegistration Sub-districtAll London
    NorthCentralSouth. westSouth. East
  • Page 23
    Birth-rate for the Borough of Hackney and its Sub-Districts for the years 1917.1927 compared with that of London.
    Year.Borough of Hackney.North Sub-District.Central Sub-District.South-West Sub-District.South-East Sub-District.London.
  • Page 23
    Amongst the Registration Sub-districts the death-rate was lowest in the Central Sub-district (11.2 per 1,000), the highest in the South. East Sub-district (12.1 per 1,000).
    Sub. district.Population (estimated).Total No. of Births. Uncorrected.*Birth rate. Uncorrected.Total Deaths Cor'tedDeath-rate.Deaths under 1 year.*Infant Mortality per 1,000 Births Uncorrected.
  • Page 24
    DEATH RATES IN PARLIAMENTARY DISTRICTS.
    District.Area (acres).Population (estimated).Death-rate.Infantile Death-rate.
  • Page 24
    The following shows the death-rate of Hackney from all causes per 1,000, compared with London during the last decade:—
    Year.Hackney.London.
  • Page 25
    INFANT MORTALITY, 1927. Nett deaths from stated causes at various ages under 1 year of age.
    Cause of Death.Under 24 hrs.1 day to 1 week.1-2 weeks.2-3 weeks.3-4 weeks.Total under 4 weeks.1-3 months.3-6 months.6-9 months.9-12 months.Total.
  • Page 26
    Number of deaths in Institutions within the Borough in 1927.
    Name of Institution.Persons belonging to the Borough.Persons not belonging to the Borough.Total Deaths.
  • Page 28
    MORTUARY, 1927.
  • Page 28
    Inquests.
    Verdict.Sex.
    Male.Female.
  • Page 28
    Table showing nature of Suicidal and Accidental Deaths in the Borough of Hackney during the year 1927.
    Nature of Suicide.No.Nature of Accidental Death.No.
  • Page 29
    TABLE I. Vital Statistics of Whole District during 1927 and Previous Years.
    Year.Population estimated to middle of each year.Births.Total Deaths Registered in the District.Transferable DeathsNett Deaths belonging to the District.
    Uncorrected Number.Nett. Number.Rate.of Nonresidents registered in the District.of residents not registered in the District.Under 1 Year of AgeAt all Ages.
    Number.Rate.
    Number.Rate per 1,000 Nett. Births.Number.Rate.
    12345678910111213
  • Page 30
    Notifiable Diseases during the year 1927 ( Deaths in Hospitals).
    Disease.No. of Deaths in Hospitals.Total Deaths.
  • Page 31
    TABLE II.—INFECTIOUS DISEASE. Notifiable Diseases during the Year 1927 ( Age groups of notifications).
    Diseases.Cases NotifiedTotal Cases Notified in each Locality.Total cases removed to Hospital.
    At Ages—Years.1234
    At all AgeUnder 1.1 to 22 to 33 to 44 to 55 to 1010 to 1515 to 2020 to 3535 to 4545 to 6565 and upwards.North.Central.South-East.South-West.
  • Page 32
    Notifiable Diseases during the year 1927 ( Age Groups of Deaths).
    Disease.Total cases notified.Cases removed to Hospital.Age Groups of Deaths.Total deaths at all ages.
    Under 11 to 22 to 33 to 44 to 55 to 1010 to 1515 to 2020 to 3535 to 4545 to 6565 and upwards.
  • Page 33
    Summary of Proceedings under the Vaccination Acts, 1867 to 1898, during the year 1927.
    Registration Sub-District.No. of Cases in Birth Lists received during Year.No. of Certificates of Vaccination received.No. of Certificates of Postponement owing toNo. of Certificates under Section 2 of Vaccination Act, 1898, and No. of Statutory Declarations under Section 1 of the Vaccination Act, 1907.No. of Certificates of Insusceptibility or of having had Smallpox.No. of Cases.No. of Entries in Lists sent to Public Vaccinator
    Health of Child.Condition of House.Prevalence of Infectious Disease.Parents Removed out of District.Otherwise not found.
  • Page 34
    The following table shows the distribution of scarlet fever in the respective Sub-districts of the Borough:—
    Sub-Districts.North.Central.South-west.South-east.
  • Page 35
    The following table shows the distribution of diphtheria in the respective Sub-districts of the Brought:-
    Sub-Districts.North.Central.South-west.South-east.
  • Page 35
    The following table shows the number of attacked persons under 15 years of age not known to have had a previous attack of Scarlet Fever and Diphtheria as they are housed, as follows : —
    Disease.Cases removed to HospitalCases nursed at Home
    Less than 1 person per room1 to 2 persons per roomMore than 2 persons per roomLess than 1 person per room1 to 2 persons per roomMore than 2 persons per room
  • Page 36
    The table below gives the distribution of the notified cases in the Sub-districts of the Borough :—
    Sub-Districts.North.Central.South-west.South-east.
    Number of cases of Typhoid Fever3452
  • Page 37
    The following table shows the distribution of the disease in the Sub-districts of the Borough:—
    Sub-Districts.North.Central.South-west.South-east.
  • Page 37
    Ophthalmia Neonatorum—(Public Health (Ophthalmia Neonatorum) Regulations, 1926, Dated 31st July, 1926).—During the year there were:—
    CasesVision UnimpairedVision ImpairedTotal BlindnessDeaths
    NotifiedTreated
    At HomeIn Hospital
  • Page 39
    The following table gives the distribution of the deaths from this disease in the different sub-districts of the Borough:—
    Sub-Districts.North.Central.South-west.South-east.
  • Page 39
    Below is given a table showing the number of deaths and death rates due to malignant disease in this Borough for the 10 years ending 1927
    Years.1918191919201921192219231924192519261927
  • Page 40
    CANCER, 1927. Analysis of the Deaths from Cancer, Malignant Tumour, Sarcoma and other forms.
    1-55-1515-2525-3535-4545-5555-6565-75 75-8585and upwards.Total
  • Page 41
    TUBERCULOSIS.
    Age PeriodsNew CasesDeaths
    PulmonaryNon-PulmonaryPulmonaryNon-Pulmonary
    M.F.M.F.M.F.M.F.
  • Page 42
    Primary Notifications and Deaths during the years 1918-1927.
    Year.Primary Notifications.Deaths.Death Rate.
    Pul.Non-pul.Total.Pul.Non-pul.Total.
  • Page 42
    In the following table the yearly deaths from tuberculous diseases in the Borough for the last 30 years are shown, grouped in periods of three years:—
    Three year periods.Annual average number of deaths from Tuberculous Disease.Percentage decrease on the period 1898-1900. Per cent.
  • Page 43
    The deaths are distributed in the sub-districts of the Borough as shown below:—
    Sub-Districts.North.Central.South-west.South-east.
  • Page 44
    Summary of Notifications during the period from 2nd January, 1927, to 31st December, 1927.
    Age Periods.Notifications on Form A. and Primary Notifications.
    0 to 11 to 55 to 1010 to 1515 to 2020 to 2525 to 3535 to 4545 to 5555 to 6565 and upwardsTotal Primary Notifications.Total Notifications on Form A.
  • Page 44
    Supplemental Return. New cases of Tuberculosis coming- to the knowledge of the Medical Officer of Health during- the same period, otherwise than by notification on Form A or Form B, under the Public Health (Tuberculosis) Regulations, 1912.
    Age periods.0 to 11 to 55 to 1010 to 1515 to 2020 to 2525 to 3535 to 4545 to 5555 to 6565 and upwardsTotal Cases.
  • Page 45
    Public Health (Tuberculosis) Regulations, 1924. The following is a summary of the quarterly returns under these regulations during the year:—
    Pulmonary.Non-pulmonary.
    Male.Female.Male.Female.
  • Page 45
    Visits paid by Tuberculosis Visitors.
    New Cases.ContactsSailors and SoldiersOther Persons.Total.Insured.Non-insured.
  • Page 47
    TUBERCULOSIS SCHEME. Return showing the work of the Dispensaries during the year 1927 .
    Diagnosis.Pulmonary.Non-pulmonary.Total.
    (6)Adults.(6)Childiren.Adults.Children.Adults.Children.
    M.F.M.F.M.F.M.f.M.FM.F.
  • Page 48
    Continued from previous page...
  • Page 50
    Condition of Patient on First Attendance. Pulmonary Tuberculosis.
    1st Stage.2nd Stage.3rd Stage.
  • Page 51
    ALL DEATHS FROM TUBERCULOSIS. Interval elapsing between Notification and Death.
    1925.1929.1927.
    Pul.Non-Pul.Pul.Non-Pul.Pul.Non-Pul.
  • Page 52
    2.— The Sources of the New Cases.
    Total.Tuberculous.
  • Page 52
    3.— The Diagnosis of the New Cases.
    Diagnosis.Adults.Children under 15.Total.
    Males.Females.Males.Females.
  • Page 53
    4.— The Diagnosis of Contact Cases.
  • Page 53
    5.— Sputum Examinations.
  • Page 53
    6.— Other Figures.
  • Page 53
    HACKNEY CASES TREATED. 1. —The Totals of New Cases.
  • Page 54
    2.— The Sources of the New Cases.
    Total.Tuberculous.
  • Page 54
    3.— The Diagnosis of the New Cases.
    Diagnosis.Adults.Children under 15.Total.
    Males.Females.Males.Females.
  • Page 54
    4.— The Diagnosis of Contact Cases.
  • Page 55
    5.— Sputum Examinations.
  • Page 55
    6.— Other Figures.
  • Page 57
    With regard to the value of this form of treatment the Tuberculosis Officer considers that generally there has been some improvement in the general condition of the patients, but little benefit to the local disease.
    Initials of Patient.Age.Previous residential treatment.Condition before treatment— General condition.Weight.Site and extent of tuberculosis.Ancillary treatment at Dispensary.Condition after treatment-General condition.Weight.Tuberculous lesion.Remarks, e.g., as to subsequent residential treatment; any harmful effects noticed.
  • Page 58
    Continued from previous page...
    Initials of Patient.Age.Previous residential treatment.Condition before treatment— General condition.Weight.Site and extent of tuberculosis.Ancillary treatment at Dispensary.Condition after treatment— General condition.Weight.Tuberculous lesion.Remarks, e.g., as to subsequent residential treatment; any harmful effects noticed.
  • Page 59
    Continued from previous page...
  • Page 60
    Continued from previous page...
    Initials of Patient.Age.Previous residential treatment.Condition before treatment— General condition.Weight.Site and extent of tuberculosis.Ancillary treatment at Dispensary.Condition after treatment— General condition.Weight.Tuberculous lesion.Remarks, e.g., as to subsequent residential treatment; any harmful effects noticed.
  • Page 61
    The number of rooms fumigated each month is set out in the following table:—
  • Page 61
    Articles Disinfected, 1927.
    Description of Articles.January.February.March.April.May.June.July.August.September.October.November.December.Totals.
  • Page 62
    In addition to these there were 503 articles destroyed on request from the owners. These are set out in the following table:— Articles Destroyed.
  • Page 63
    The following are the Schools from which children were sent to the Cleansing Station, with the number of baths given: —
    Schools.Hot Baths.Sulphur Baths.
  • Page 64
    Continued from previous page...
    Schools.Hot Baths.Sulphur Baths.
  • Page 65
    The following table gives particulars of the number, etc., of persons who were bathed and cleansed for parasitic disease at the Disinfection Station during the year.
    January.February.March.April.May.June.July.August.September.October.November.December.Totals.
  • Page 67
    Clinics and Treatment Centres.— ( a ) Infant Welfare Centres.
    Name and Situation.Nature of Accommodation.By whom provided.
  • Page 68
    Continued from previous page...
    Name and Situation.Nature of Accommodation.By whom provided.
  • Page 69
    ( g ) School Clinics.
    Name and Situation.Nature of Accommodation.By whom provided.
  • Page 69
    Hospitals provided or subsidised by the Local Authority or by the London County Council.—
    Name and Situation.By whom provided.
  • Page 70
    The following institutions are subsidised by the Ministry of Health, but not by the Borough Council, with the exception of the Salvation Army Mothers' Hospital, Clapton, and afford, in most instances, accommodation for both married and unmarried mothers.
    Name and Situation.Nature of Accommodation.By whom provided.
  • Page 71
    Conditions Found by the Visitors.
    No. of Infants visited.Method of Feeding.Separate cot provided for Infant.Use of Comforter.Home conditions.Secondary visits.
    BreastArtificial.Mixed.Yes.No.Yes.No.Satisfactory.Un-satis-fac-tory.
  • Page 72
    ANTE-NATAL WELFARE CENTRES.
    CENTRES.No. of times Centre open.No. of Expectant Mothers attending first visits.No. of repeated attendances at Centre.Total attendancesNo. of examinations by Doctor.
  • Page 72
    SUMMARY OF CENTRE WORK. Infant Consultation Centres.
    Centre.No. of times Centre openNo. of primary cases brought to Centre.Repeated visits to Centre.Total attendancesTotal attendances of Infants under 1 year.Total attendances of children over 1 year.No. of attendances of infants and children before Welfare Doctor.
  • Page 73
    Visits of Health Visitors, 1927.
    1. Primary Visits. 2. Total Visits.Mrs. L. E. BartholomewMiss M. ChitsonMiss M. CockleMiss E. HamiltonMrs. L. HarrisonMiss N. V. HobbsMiss J. D. KimpsfordMiss S. E. LoveMiss A. RocheMrs. A. RhodesMiss A. TeebayMiss G. S. ThomasMiss D. F. VidalMiss E. E. WilliamsonTemporary Visitors.Eton Mission (voluntary)Hackney Grove (voluntary)Totals.
  • Page 75
    Necessitous Cases.
    Cases.Cost.
  • Page 75
    4.— NURSING ASSISTANCE.
    No. of Cases Nursed.No. of Visits Paid.
  • Page 76
    ( a ) Supplied free of charge to necessitous mothers:—
    £s.d.
  • Page 83
    VII.— SANITARY ADMINISTRATION. HOUSING AND WORK OF SANITARY INSPECTION. Public Health (London) Act, 1891.
    Year.Intimation Notices.Statutory Notices.Legal Proceedings.
  • Page 84
    These homes were inspected, with the following results:—
    No. of Homes Inspected.No. of Homes where Rooms alone were found Verminous.No. of Homes where Bedding or Clothes and Rooms were found Verminous.No. of Homes not Verminous.
  • Page 88
    Prosecutions under the Public Health (London) Act 1891, and Regulations during the year 1927.
    Inspector.Address.Complaint.Magistrate's decision.Fine.Costs.
    £s.d.£s.d.
  • Page 89
    Continued from previous page...
    Inspector.Address.Complaint.Magistrate's decision.Fine.Costs.
    £S.d.£s.d.
  • Page 90
    Continued from previous page...
    Inspector.Address.Complaint.Magistrate's decision.Fine.Costs.
    £s.d.£s.d.
  • Page 91
    Continued from previous page...
    Inspector.Address.Complaint.Magistrate's decision.Fines.Costs.
    £S.d.£s.d.
  • Page 92
    Continued from previous page...
    Inspector.Address.Complaint.Magistrate's decision.Fines.Costs.
    £s.d.£s.d.
  • Page 93
    Inspector.Address.Complaint.Magistrate's decision.Fines.Costs.
    £s.d.£s.d.
  • Page 94
    During the year, 415 inspections were made of factories and 2,205 of workshops by the officers of the Public Health Department. In 131 of these premises the sanitary accommodation was defective, unsuitable or insufficient, or not separate for the sexes.
    Nuisance.Found.Abated by Workshop Inspector.Abated by District Inspector.Outstanding.
  • Page 95
    (a) Wearing Apparel.
    Occupations.No. of Workshops.Occupations.No. of Workshops.
  • Page 96
    (b) Other Occupations.
  • Page 96
    Including Inspections made by Sanitary Inspectors or Inspectors of Nuisances.
    Premises.Number of
    Inspections.Written Notices.Prosecutions.
  • Page 97
    2.— DEFECTS FOUND.
    Particulars.Number of Defects.Number of Prosecutions.
    Found.Remedied.Referred to H.M. Inspector.
  • Page 98
    4.— OTHER MATTERS.
    Class.Number.
  • Page 99
    5.— HOME WORK.
    Nature of Work.Outworkers' Lists, Section 107.Outwork in Unwholesome Premises, Section 108.Outwork in Infected Premises, Sections 109, 110.
    Lists received from EmployersNotices served on Occupiers as to keeping or sending Lists.Prosecutions.Instances.Notices served.Prosecutions.Instances.Orders Made (Section 110).Prosecutions (Sections 109, 110).
    Twice in the year.Once in the year.Failing to keep or permit inspection of Lists.Falling to send Lists.
    Outworkers.Outworkers.
    Lists.ContractorsWork-men.Lists.ContractorsWorkmen.
  • Page 100
    The following analysis shows the trades followed by these outworkers:—
    Trade.No. of Outworkers.Trade.No. of Outworkers.
  • Page 104
    Public Health ( Milk and Cream ) Regulations, 1912 and 1917. 1. Milk; and Cream not sold as Preserved Cream.
    (a) Number of samples examined for the presence of a preservative.(b) Number in which preservative was reported to be present, and percentage of preservative found in each sample.
  • Page 108
    Sale of Food and Drugs Acts, 1875— 1907. Samples purchased during 1927.
    Sample.No. purchased.No. adulterated.No. where proceedings taken.
  • Page 109
    Continued from previous page...
    Sample.No. purchased.No. adulterated.No. where proceedings taken.
  • Page 110
    Continued from previous page...
    Sample.No. purchased.No. adulterated.No. where proceedings taken.
  • Page 110
    Prosecutions Under the Sale of Food and Drugs Acts during the Year 1927.
    No. of Sample.Inspector.Article.Adulteration or Offence.Result of Legal Proceedings.Fine.Costs.
    £s.d.
  • Page 114 115
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1927.
    INSPECTIONS.Mr. Fowler, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew, No. 2 District.Mr. Vobe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District.Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 District.Mr. Long, No. 8 District.Mr.Goldsworthy, No. 9 District,Mr. Nighy, No. 10 District.Mr. Hillier, No. 11 District.Mr. Crook, No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove, No. 13 District.Mr. Hall, No. 14 District.Mr. Galvin, Special.Mr. Smith, Special.Mr. Bobbitt, Special.Mr. Peverett, Special.Miss Teebay, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTAL
  • Page 116 117
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1927.
    INSPECTIONS.Mr. Fowler, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew, No. 2 District.Mr. Vobe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District.Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 District.Mr. Long, No. 8 District.Mr.Goldsvvorthy, No. 9 District,Mr. Nighy, No. 10 District.Mr. Hillier, No. 11 District.Mr. Crook, No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove, No. 13 District.Mr. Hall, No. 14 District.Mr. Galvin, Special.Mr. Smith, Special.Mr. Bobbitt, Special.Mr. Peverett, Special.Miss Teebay, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTAL.
  • Page 118 119
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1927.
    INSPECTIONS.Mr. Fowler, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew, No. 2 District.Mr. Vobe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District.Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 District.Mr. Long, No. 8 District.Mr.Goldsworthy, No. 9 District,Mr. Nighy, No. 10 District.Mr. Hillier, No. 11 District.Mr. Crook, No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove, No. 13 District.Mr. Hall, No. 14 District.Mr. Galvin, Special.Mr. Smith, Special.Mr. Bobbitt, Special.Mr. Peverett, Special.Miss Teebay, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTAL.
  • Page 120 121
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1927.
    INSPECTIONS.Mr. Fowler, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew, No. 2 District.Mr. Vobe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District.Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 District.Mr. Long, No. 8 District.Mr.Goldsworthy, No. 9 District,Mr. Nighy, No. 10 District.Mr. Hillier, No. 11 District.Mr. Crook, No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove, No. 13 District.Mr. Hall, No. 14 District.Mr. Galvin, Special.Mr. Smith, Special.Mr. Bobbitt, Special.Mr. Peverett, Special.Miss Teebay, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTAL.
  • Page 122 123
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1927.
    INSPECTIONS.Mr. Fowler, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew, No. 2 District.Mr. Vobe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District.Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 District.Mr. Long, No. 8 District.Mr.Goldsvvorthy, No. 9 District,Mr. Nighy, No. 10 District.Mr. Hillier, No. 11 District.Mr. Crook, No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove, No. 13 District.Mr. Hall, No. 14 District.Mr. Galvin, Special.Mr. Smith, Special.Mr. Bobbitt, Special.Mr. Peverett, Special.Miss Teebay, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.total.
  • Page 124 125
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1927.
    INSPECTIONSMr. Fowler, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew, No. 2 District.Mr. Vobe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District.Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 District.Mr. Long, No. 8 District.Mr. Golds worthy, No. 9 District,Mr. Nighy, No. 10 District.Mr. Hillier, No. 11 District.Mr. Crook, No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove, No. 13 District.Mr. Hall, No. 14 District.Mr. Galvin, Special.Mr. Smith, Special.Mr. Bobbitt, Special.Mr. Peverett, Special.Miss Teebay, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTAL.
  • Page 126
    Analysis of Causes of Deaths of Inhabitants of Hackney during 1927.
    AGESUnder 1 year.1 to 2.2 to 5.5 to 15.15 to 25.25 to 35.35 to 45.45 to 55.55 to 65.65 to 75.75 to 85.85 and upwards.All ages.
  • Page 127
    Analysis of Causes of Deaths— continued.
    AGESUnder 1 year.1 to 2.2 to 5.5 to 15.15 to 25.25 to 35.35 to 45.45 to 55.55 to 65.65 to 75.75 to 85.85 and upwards.All ages.
  • Page 128
    Analysis of Causes of Deaths— continued.
    AGESUnder 1 year.1 to 2.2 to 5.5 to 15.15 to 25.25 to 35.35 to 45.45 to 55.55 to 65.65 to 75.75 to 85.85 and upwards.All ages.
  • Page 129
    Analysis of Causes of Deaths— continued.
    AGESUnder 1 year.1 to 2.2 to 5.5 to 15.15 to 25.25 to 35.35 to 45.45 to 55.55 to 65.65 to 75.75 to 85.85 and upwards.All ages.
  • Page 130
    Analysis of Causes of Deaths— continued.
    AGESUnder 1 year.1 to 2.2 to 5.5 to 15.15 to 25.25 to 35.35 to 45.45 to 55.55 to 65.65 to 75.75 to 85.85 and upwards.All ages.
  • Page 131
    Analysis of Causes of Deaths— continued.
    AGESUnder 1 year.1 to 2.2 to 5.5 to 15.15 to 25.25 to 35.35 to 45.45 to 55.55 to 65.65 to 75.75 to 85.85 and upwards.All ages.
  • Page 132
    Analysis of Causes of Deaths— continued.
    AGESUnder 1 year.1 to 2.2 to 5.5 to 15.15 to 25.25 to 35.35 to 45.45 to 55.55 to 65.65 to 75.75 to 85.85 and upwards.All ages.
  • Page 133
    Analysis of Causes of Deaths— continued.
    AGESUnder 1 year.1 to 2.2 to 5.5 to 15.15 to 25.25 to 35.35 to 45.45 to 55.55 to 65.65 to 75.75 to 85.85 and upwards.All ages.
  • Page 134
    Analysis of Causes of Deaths— continued.
    AGESUnder 1 year.1 to 2.2 to 5.5 to 15.15 to 25.25 to 35.35 to 45.45 to 55.55 to 65.65 to 75.75 to 85.85 and upwards.All ages.
  • Page 135
    Short List of Causes of Death at Different Periods of Life of Residents of Hackney during 1927.
    Causes of Death.Sex.All Ages0—12-5—15 —25—45—65—75—
  • Page 136
    Causes of Death— continued.
    Causes of Death.Sex.All Ages.0—1-2—5—15—25—45—65-75—