London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

London County Council 1933

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for London County Council]

This page requires JavaScript

The details of the work done at this clinic are as follows:—

Number of attendances of ear, nose and throat cases6,051
„ patients treated—506, representing582 ears.
Number of ionisation administrations1,872
„ ultra-violet irradiations167
„ dressings3,975
Number of ear patients treated after mastoid operation229 = 259 ears.
,, other ear patients treated277 = 323 ears.

The following are particulars of new patients discharged from Downs hospital during 1933:—

Patients.Ears.
No treatment required1717
Treated at the Council's clinics—now well77
Treated at after-care clinic—now well92105
Still under treatment at after-care clinic on 31st December, 19335460
Still under treatment at the Council's clinics on 31st December, 19331313
Referred back for further operation57
Lost sight of since1215
Total200224

The following are particulars of the cases referred from Downs hospital in 1932, and continuing treatment into 1933:—

Patients.Ears.
Referred back to Downs hospital for further operation78
Treated at after-care clinic—now well3741
Still under treatment on 31st December, 193323
Transferred to the Council's clinics in 193322
Lost sight of11
Total4955

In addition to the above the following are particulars of cases which were discharged from Downs hospital in 1932, but went to the Council's clinics and continued their treatment into 1933:—

Patients.Ears.
Treated at the Council's clinics—now well67
Still under treatment at the Council's clinics78
Lost sight of45
Total1720

Audiometer.
One of the features of the past year has been the regular audiometric work done in the
elementary schools. One session a week has been devoted to this work. All the children of a
department are given a test which is described as test No. 1. Those who fail to satisfy this test
are given a second test—test No. 2. As a rule, a certain proportion of the failures in test No. 1
satisfy test No. 2. The failures in test No. 2 are then given a clinical examination to find out
what is the cause of the hearing defect. A certain proportion of these will be found to benefit
by some form of treatment. This treatment is recommended and an endeavour made to obtain
it. After the treatment is completed, a further test—test No. 3—is given. The result of this
test shows what result, if any, treatment has had on the defect present. A child who shows a
hearing loss of nine or more sensation units on the decibel scale in either ear is regarded as not
satisfying the tests. I have recorded the results in graph form, which gives a much clearer
reading than masses of figures.