Table: Details ofAdulteratedSamples ofMilkduring the Year ended December31st,1913.
Details ofAdulteratedSamples ofMilkduring the Year ended December31st,1913.
Sample Marked. | Adulteration. | Remarks. |
---|
| Official Samples. | |
8 | 3 per cent, deficient in milk fat | Vendor cautioned by direction of the Public Health Committee |
16 | 3 | |
102 | 3 | |
103 | 4.5 | |
104 | 4.5 | |
124 | 43 | Proceedings were taken against master and servant, and they were fined £5 and £1 3s. costs, and £4 and £1 3s. costs respectively |
128 | 4 | Vendor cautioned by direction of the Public Health Committee |
163 | 10 | Summons dismissed on proof of warranty |
288 | 3 | Vendor cautioned by direction of the Public Health Committee |
291 | 3 | |
297 | 30 | Summons dismissed on proof of warranty |
337 | 20 | Vendor fined 10s. and £1 3s. costs |
344 | 1.0 | Vendor ordered to pay costs, 2s., and his servant fined £2 10s. and £1 3s. costs |
848 . | 3 | No action |
464 | 3 | Vendor cautioned by direction of the Public Health Committee |
| Separated Milk : | |
48 | 26 per cent, added water | Vendor fined £2 and £1 3s. costs |
120 | 28 | Vendor fined £4 and £1 3s. costs |
| Test Samples. | |
122 | 23 per cent, deficient in milk fat | Subsequent Official SampleNo. 124 |
123 | 20 |
328 | 26 per cent, deficient in milk fat | Subsequent Official Sample | No. 337 |
329 | 16 |
330 | 11 |
451 | 10 percent, deficient in milk fat | Subsequent Official Samples were genuine |
452 | 16 |
454 | 16 |
457 | 16 |
458 | 96 |
460 | 3 |