London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report tables

Shoreditch 1932

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Shoreditch]

Published
1933
Pages
155
Tables
118

This page requires JavaScript

118 tables in this report

  • Page 2
    EXTRACTS FROM VITAL STATISTICS FOR THE YEAR 1932.
    Total.M.F.Birth Rate
  • Page 3
    For purposes of comparison the vital statistics of the Borough during recent years are given in the following table:—
    YearPopulation estimated to middle of each yearBirthsTotal Deaths registered in the DistrictTransferable DeathsNett Deaths Belonging to the District
    Uncorrected NumberNettNumberRateof Nonresidents registered in the Districtof residents not registered in the DistrictUnder 1 year of ageAt all Ages
    NumberRateNumberRate per 1000nett BirthsNumberRate
    12345678910111213
  • Page 4
    ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF LONDON AND SHOREDITCH BIRTH AND DEATH RATES FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31st DECEMBER, 1932.
    DISTRICTS.Estimated Population. 1932.ANNUAL RATE PER 1,000 PERSONS LIVING.Infants under 1 year Death rate per 1,000 Live Births.PERCENTAGE TO TOTAL DEATHS.
    BIRTHS.DEATHS DURING THE YEARS.DEATHS DURING 1932 FROMInquest Cases.Death sin Public Institutions.Uncertified Causes of Death.
    12345678910
    1929.1930.1931.1932.(cols. 2-8)SmallpoxMeasles.Scarlet Fever.Diphtheria .Whooping Cough.*Fever.†Diarrhoea Enteritis (under 2 yearTuberculous Disease.Violence.
    Principal Zymotic Diseases.
  • Page 5
    BIRTH-RATE, DEATH-RATE, AND ANALYSIS OF MORTALITY DURING THE YEAR 1932. (Non-civilians included).
    -Rate per 1,000 Total Population.Annual Death-rate per 1,000 Population.Rate per 1,000 Live Births.Percentage of Total Deaths.
    Live Births.Still-birthsAll Causes.Typhoid and Paratyphoid FeversSmall-pox.Measles.Scarlet Fever.Whooping Cough.Diphtheria.Influenza.Violence.Diarrhoea and Enteritis (under two years).Total Deaths under one year.Certified by Registered Medical Practitioners.Inquest cases.Certified by Coroner after P.M. No Inquest.Uncertified Causes of Death.
  • Page 7
    Numbers of persons resident in the Metropolitan Borough of Shoreditch, recorded as unemployed, at quarterly dates in the years 1928 to 1932:—
    Date.Men.Women.Juveniles.Total.
  • Page 7
    I have also to thank the Chief Officer of Public Assistance of the London County Council for the following figures relating to persons in receipt of domiciliary relief in Shoreditch: —
    Week ended.Number of persons in receipt of domiciliary relief (excluding medical relief only).Number of persons in receipt of medical relief only.
  • Page 12
    I.—ACREAGE, POPULATION, PRIVATE FAMILIES AND DWELLINGS IN THE BOROUGH AND IN EACH WARD.
    Acreage (Land & Inland Water)1921 PersonsTOTAL POPULATIONPRIVATE FAMILIES & DWELLINGS, 1931
    1931Private FamiliesPopulation in Private FamiliesStructurally Separate Dwellings occupiedRooms OccupiedPersons per Room
    PersonsMalesFemalesPersons per Acre
    Columns a.b.c.d.e.f.gh.i.jk.l
  • Page 13
    II.—INTERCENSAL VARIATION IN POPULATION.
    Shoreditch.London.
  • Page 14
    III.—AGES (GROUPED) BY MARITAL CONDITION
    Age last BirthdayPersonsMALESFEMALES
    TotalSingleMarriedWidowedDivorcedTotalSingleMarriedWidowedDivorced
  • Page 15
    IV.—AGE AND CONDITION DISTRIBUTIONS
    Average AgeAge distribution per 1,000 of each sex (Ages last birthday)Marital condition distribution per 1,000 of each sexNo. of Married Women aged less than 45 per 1,000 females of all ages.No. of Females per 1,000 Males.
    MalesFemalesMalesFemales
    MalesFemales0-45-1920-3040-0-45-1920-3040-SingleMarriedWidowed and DivorcedSingleMarriedWidowed and Divorced
  • Page 16
    The population in the various Wards of the Borough is estimated as follows: —
    Ward.Population.Area in acres*Density per acre.
  • Page 16
    BIRTHS. Numbers of live births registered in the above-named area during the calendar year 1932: —
    Total Live Births (Legitimate and Illegitimate).Live births registered (excluding re-registration).Inward Transfers.Outward Transfers.Live births allocated to the Borough.
  • Page 17
    The distribution of the corrected births and the birth rates in the eight Wards of the Borough are given below: —
    Ward.Males.Females.Total.Births per 1,000 Population.
  • Page 17
    Numbers of still births registered in the above-named area during the calendar year 1932: —
    Total Legitimate and Illegitimate.Stillbirths registered.Inward Transfers.Outward Transfers.Stillbirths allocated to the Borough.
  • Page 18
    During recent years the corresponding figures have been as follows: —
    Year.No. of marriages.Marriage rate.
    Shoreditch.London.
  • Page 19
    The distribution of the deaths and the death rates in the different Wards are given below: —
    Ward.Males.Females.Total.Deaths per 1,000 populationDeaths of infants under 1 year per 1,000 births registered.
  • Page 20
    In the subjoined table are set forth the various institutions outside Shoreditch with the number of persons belonging to the Borough dying therein: —
    Asylums:—No. of Deaths.No. of Deaths.
  • Page 21
    PUBLIC MORTUARY, 1932.
    Number of bodies deposited from—
  • Page 22 23
    The causes of deaths at all ages together with Ward distribution and particulars relating to the deaths in Public Institutions in the Borough is contained in the following table:-
    CAUSES OF DEATH.AGES.DEATHS IN EACH WARD.SEX.Holborn InstitutionS. Leonards HospitalRoy' 1 Chest HospitalHome of Good ShepherdConvent HospitalInfant Welfare Centre
    1. Under1 to 2.2 to 5.5 to 10.10 to 15.15 to 20.20 to 25.25 to 35.35 to 45.45 to 55.55 to 65.65 to 75.75 to 85.85 and upwards.Moorfields.Church.Hoxton.Wenlock.Whitmore.Kingsland.Haggerston.Acton.Male.Female.Belonging to Shoreditch.Not belonging to ShoreditchBelonging to Shoreditch.Not belonging to ShoreditchBelonging to Shoreditch.Not belonging | to ShoreditchBelonging to Shoreditch.Not belonging to ShoreditchBelonging to Shoreditch.Not belonging to ShoreditchBelonging to Shoreditch.Not belonging to Shoreditch
  • Page 24
    Deaths of Infants under one year per 1,000 births registered:—
    Year.England. and Wales.London.Shoreditch.
  • Page -
    Infantile Mortality in the Borough During Year, 1932.
    CAUSE OF DEATH.*AGES.*DEATHS IN EACH WARD.SEX.
    Under 1 day.1 day-1 week.1-2 weeks.2-3 weeks.3-4 weeks.Total under 1 month.1-3 months.3-6 months.6-9 months.9-12 months.Total under 1 year.Moorfields.Church.Hoxton.Wenlock.Whitmore.Kingsland."I Haggerston.Acton.Male.Female.
    MFMFMFMFMFMFMFMF
  • Page 25
    For purposes of comparison the maternal mortality rates per 1,000 live births in England and Wales, London and Shoreditch, during the year 1932 and ten preceding years are given as follows:—
    England and Wales.LondonShoreditch.
    YearDeaths from Sepsis.Deaths from other diseases and accidents of Pregnancy.Total.Deaths from Sepsis.Deaths from other diseases and accidents of Pregnancy.Total. ,Deaths from Sepsis.Deaths from other diseases and accidents of Pregnancy.Total.
  • Page 27
    MATERNAL MORTALITY, 1932.
    AGES.Married.Single.Widowed.WARDS.
    15 to 20 yrs.20 to 25 yrs.25 to 30 yrs.30 to 35 yrs.35 to 40 yrs.40 to 45 yrs.45 yrs.Moorfields.Church.Hoxton.Wenlock.Whitmore.Kingsland.Haggerston.Acton.
  • Page 28
    The deaths from Cancer during the last five years per million persons living are given in the following comparative table:—
    England and Wales.London.Shoreditch.
  • Page 29
    Deaths from Cancer in the Borough during Year 1932.
    AGES.SEX.WARDS.
    0 to 15.15 to 20.20 to 25.25 to 35.35 to 45.45 to 55.55 to 65.65 to 75.75 to 85.85 and up.Male.Female.Moorfields.Church.Hoxton.Wenlock.Whitmore.Kingsland.HaggerstonActon.
    MFMFMFMFMFMFMFMF
  • Page 30
    III.—INFECTIOUS DISEASE. Notifiable Disease. Excluding- tuberculosis, the deaths during the year from notifiable infectious diseases numbered 129 (10.9 per cent of the total deaths. The corresponding number for 1931 was 158 (12.8 per cent of total deaths). The following table shows the numbers of cases of infectious disease (tuberculosis excluded) notified in the Borough, together with distribution as to quarter, age and Ward:—
    NUMBER OF CASES NOTIFIED.
    NOTIFIABLE DISEASE.1st Quarter2nd Quarter3rd Quarter4th QuarterTotalAGES.WARDS.Cases removed to HospitalDiagnosis evised subsequentlyDeaths
    IIIIIIIVVVIVIIVIII
    Under 1 year1 to 55 to 15I5 to 2525 to 4545 to 6565Moor-lieldsChurshHoxtonWrn-lockWhitmoreKings-landHagger-stonActon
  • Page 31
    The age, Seasonal and Ward distribution are included in the table on page 30. Further information is contained in the following table:-
    Ward.No. of cases.Fatal Cases.Rates per 1,000 Population.Case Mortality. Deaths per 100 cases.
    M.F.Total.M.F.Total.AttackDeath
  • Page 31
    The following table shows the prevalence of smallpox in the country, London and Shoreditch during recent years:—
    Cases Notified.Shoreditch.
    England & Wales.London.
  • Page 33
    VACCINATION OFFICERS' RETURN RESPECTING THE VACCINATION OF CHILDREN WHOSE BIRTHS WERE REGISTERED IN 1931.
    Date.Number of these births duly entered in Columns 1, 2, 4 and 5 of the vaccination register (birth list sheets), viz.:—Number of these births which are not entered in the vaccination register, on account (as shown by report book), of
    Registration sub-districts comprised in vaccination officers' district.Number of births returned in birth list sheets.Column 1, successfully vaccinated.Column 2.Column 5, dead, unvac-cinated.Postponement by medical certificate.Removed to other districts and notified to vaccination officers of the districts.Removal to places unknown, or which cannot be reached, and cases not having been found.Cases remaining or temporarily unaccounted for.T otal number of certificates of successful vaccination received during the calendar year 1932.Number of Statutory Declarations of Conscientious Objection actually received by the Vaccination Officer irrespective of the dates of birth of the children to which they relate, during the Calendar Year 1932.
    Insusceptible of vaccination.Certificate of conscientious objection.
  • Page 34
    Shoreditch Borough Council.
    Name of- Poor Law Institution or Vaccination District.Name of Medical Officer or Public Vaccinator.Numbers of successful primary vaccinations of persons.Number of successful re-vaccinations, i.e., successful vaccinations of persons who had been successfully vaccinated at some previous time.Observations.
    Under one year of age.One year and upwards.Total.
  • Page 34
    The age, seasonal and Ward distribution of the cases are included in the table on page 30, There were six fatal cases. The number of cases and the attack rates in the Borough and Wards are given in the subjoined table:—
    Ward.No. of cases.Fatal Cases.Rates per 1,000 Population.Case Mortality. Deaths per 100 cases.
    Male.Female.Total.Male.Female.Total.
    AttackDeath
  • Page 35
    The number of cases, the deaths amongst males and females and the attack, death and mortality rates in the Borough, its Wards and in London are given in the subjoined table:—
    Ward.No. of cases.Fatal Cases.Rates per 1,000 Population.Case Mortality. Deaths per 100 cases.
    M.F.Total.M.F.Total.
    AttackDeath
  • Page 36
    The number of cases notified per 1,000 population are compared in the following table:—
    19221923192419251926192719281929193019311932
  • Page 37
    A comparison between London and Shoreditch is contained in the following table:—
    Per 1,000 inhabitants.Deaths per 100 cases.
    Attack rate.Death rate.
  • Page 38
    In the following table the number of notified cases of and deaths from Puerperal Fever in London and Shoreditch during recent years are compared. It should be explained that the Shoreditch figures include only cases actually notified as Puerperal Fever. Cases primarily notified as Puerperal Pyrexia and afterwards stated to be suffering from Puerperal Fever are not included.
    London.Shoreditch.
    Year.Cases.Cases per 1,000 births.Deaths.Deaths per 1,000 births.Cases.Cases per 1,000 births.Deaths.Deaths per 1,000 births.
  • Page 40
    Unfortunately, however, it is only possible to arrange this in very few cases.
    Cases.Vision unimpairedVision impaired.Total blindness.Deaths.
    Notified.Treated at home.In Hospital
  • Page 41
    The number of deaths from this disease in London and Shoreditch during recent years have been as follows:—
    193219311930192919281927
  • Page 43
    As will be seen from the following table, measles is a disease which tends to become widespread every few years, for the reason that after a bad measles year a large number of children are protected by the fact that they have had the disease.
    DeathsDeath rate per 1,000 population
    YearShoreditchLondonShoreditchLondon
  • Page 46
    Whooping Cough. The number of deaths from this disease in Shoreditch during 1932 and preceding years were as follows:—
    Year.Deaths.Year.Deaths.
  • Page 46
    Influenza was less prevalent both in Shoreditch and in London as a whole in 1932 than during the immediately preceding year. Comparative figures for recent years are contained in the following table:—
    Year.Deaths.Deaths per 1,000 population.Deaths.Deaths per 1,000 population.
  • Page 46
    In the following table the deaths and death rates of children under one year and between one year and two years in Shoreditch and London are compared:
    Deaths under two years.Deaths under one year.
    Total number.Rate per 1,000 Population.Total number.Rate per 1,000 births.Percentage of deaths under 1 year.
  • Page 47
    The particulars of these exclusions from school are as follows:—
    Disease from which suffering or to which exposed.Number of exclusions from School.
  • Page 48
    Subjoined is a list of cases nursed under this agreement during the year 1932.
    DiseaseUnder 5VisitsDiseaseOver 5Visits
  • Page 50
    The number of bacteriological examinations carried out on behalf of the Borough Council in connection with the diagnosis of venereal disease during the past five years is as follows:—
  • Page 51
    The total number of Intimations served as to insanitary conditions was 4,493. The number served on each Sanitary District was as follows:—
  • Page 52
    Workshops Act, 1901, and in connection with the drains and sanitary arrangements of new buildings is included:—
    Inspections, 1932DISTRICTSTotal
    12345678910
  • Page 53
    Continued from previous page...
    Work Done, 1932DISTRICTSTotals
    12345678910
  • Page 54
    Rats and Mice Destruction Act, 1919. Summary.
    InspectorsDISTRICTSTotals
    12345678910
  • Page 57
    The following summary follows in the main the return made to the Medical Officer of Health of the London County Council for inclusion in his Annual Report for the year 1932:— Sanitary Area.
    premises.number OF places—Number of inspections, 1932Number of notices, 1932Number of prosecutions, 1932
    On register at end of 1931Added in 1932Removed in 1932On register at end of 1932
  • Page 63
    The results of the year's work are summarized in the following Table:—
    Quarter of 1932.Number of | Samples taken.Number of Samples Adulterated.Percentage Adulterated.Number of Prosecutions Instituted.Prosecutions withdrawn be. ! cause of Warranties, &c.Prosecutions 1 Proceeded with.Number of Successful Prosecutions.Fines and Costs.Amount paid to Analyst for Samples Analysed.
  • Page 63
    The Samples taken during 1932 included : —
  • Page 64
    In the subjoined table are shown the number of samples of milk taken during the four quarters of the year, with the numbers and percentage of those not found to be genuine:—
    Quarter of the year.Number of Samples.Number not genuine.Percentage adulterated.
  • Page 65
    During 1932 samples of milk were taken from 9 dairymen who deliver milk to schools in the Borough as follow:—
    DairymanSamples submitted for chemical analysisResultSamples for bacteriological examinationBacteria per c.c.Coliform Bacillus
  • Page 66
    The subjoined table gives a comparison of the results of the work under the Sale of Food and Drugs Acts for the years 1907.1932 inclusive:—
    Year.Number of Samples.Number of persons in the Borough to each Sample.Number of Samples adulterated.Percentage of samples adulterated.Number of prosecutions instituted.Summonses withdrawn on account of warranties.Prosecutions proceeded with.Number of successful prosecutions.Fines and Costs.Amount paid to Public Analyst.
    s.d.£s.d.
  • Page 67
    The following table shows the results of bacteriological analysis of samples of milk sold under this Order :—
    No. of SampleDesignation of MilkNo. of bacteria per c. cm.Presence of coliform bacillusRemarks
  • Page 68
    Undesignated Milk. The results of the bacteriological examination of thirty-four samples of ordinary milk are given in the following table:—
    No. of SampleDate when taken 1932No. of bacteria per c. cm.Presence of coliform bacillus
  • Page 70
    A classification of the workshops on the register at the end of the year is contained in the following table : — R egistered W orkshops —1932.
    Workshops on the Register (s. 131) at the end of the year. (1)Number. (2)
  • Page 71
    The particulars of inspections made by the Sanitary Inspectors are as Allows : —
    Premises, (i)Number of
    Inspections. (2)Written Notices. (3)Prosecutions. (4)
  • Page 71
    The defects found and dealt with were as follows : —
    Particulars.Number of Defects.Number of Prosecutions.
    Found.Remedied.Referred to H.M. Inspector.
  • Page 72
    Other Matters.
    Class.Number.
  • Page 73
    The following is a summary of the lists received from employers in the Borough:-
    NATURE OF WORK (1)OUTWORKERS LISTS, SECTION 107.Outwork iu unwholesome premises. Section 108.Out work in infected premises. Sections 109 and 110.
    Lists received from Employers.Notices served on Occupiers as to keeping or sending Lists. (8)Prosecutions.Instances. (11)Notices served (12)Prosecutions. (l3)Instances. (14)Orders made (S. 109) (15)Prosecutions. (S. 109. 110.) (16)
    Twice in the Year.Once in the Year.Failing to keep or permit inspection of Lists. (9)Failing to send Lists. (10)
    Lists. (2)Outworkers.Lists. (5)Outworkers.
    Contractors (3)Work- men. (4)Contractors (6)Work- men. (7)
  • Page 74
    Communications were received from various sanitary authorities relating to some 1,157 outworkers for firms outside Shoreditch and as 5 of these were residents in other Boroughs, their addresses were forwarded to the authorities concerned. The following table shows the numbers of addresses of outworkers received from the sanitary authorities referred to during 1932.
    Districts.Making Wearing Aonarel.Toys and Crackers.Artificial Flowers.Furniture and Upholstery.Fur PullingLace CurtainsUmbrellas. &c.Paper Bags and Boxes.Brush MakingFancy Leather Goods.Card Mounting.Racquets or Tennis BallsTotals.
    Feb.Aug.Feb.Aug.Feb.Aug.Feb.Aug.Feb.Aug.Feb.Aug.Feb.Aug.Feb.Aug.Feb.Aug.Feb. j Aug. 1Feb.Aug.Feb.Aug.
  • Page 75
    Legal Proceedings. The following is a full list of legal proceedings instituted during the year under report: — Public Health (London) Act, 1891 and Bye-Laws.
    DateNature of OffenceFineCostsRemarks
  • Page 76
    Continued from previous page...
    DateNature of OffenceFineCostsRemarks
  • Page 77
    Food and Drugs (Adulteration) Act, 1928. Public Health (Preservatives, etc., in Food) Regulations, 1925 to 1927. Milk and Dairies Order, 1926.
    DateNature of OffenceFineCostsRemarks
    £s.d.£s.d.
  • Page 78
    Continued from previous page...
    DateNature of OffenceFineCostsRemarks
  • Page 78
    Rag Flock Acts, 1911 and 1928.
    DateNature of OffenceFineCostsRemarks
  • Page 79
    rart L.—Summary or .Notifications during the period from the 3rd January, 1932, to the 31st December, 1932: —
    Age periodsFORMAL NOTIFICATIONS.
    Number of Primary Notifications of new cases of Tuberculosis.Total Notifications
    0 to 11 to 55 to 1010 to IS15 to 20 20 to 2525 to 3535 to 4545 to 5555 to 6565 and upwardsTotal (all ages)
  • Page 79
    Supplemental Return. Part II.—New cases of Tuberculosis coming to the knowledge of the Medical Officer of Health during the above-mentioned period, otherwise than Dy formal notification : —
    Age periods0 to 1.1 to 5.5 to 10.10 to 15.15 to 20.20 to 25.25 to 35.35 to 45.45 to 55.55 to 65.65 and upwards.Total (all ages).
  • Page 79
    Continued from previous page...
    source of information as to the above-mentioned cases.No. of Cases
    PulmonaryNon- Pulmonary
  • Page 80
    Part III : — Notification Register.
    Number of cases of Tuberculosis remaining on the Register at the 31st December, 1932PulmonaryNon-PulmonaryTotal Cases
    MalesFemalesTotalMalesFemalesTotal
  • Page 81
    The distribution of the cases notified (primary notification) among the different Wards was as follows : —
    Ward.Pulmonary.Non-Pulmonary.Total.No. per 1,000 inhabitants.
  • Page 81
    These notifications are summarized below: —
    Number of Notifications on Form I (of admission of case to Institution).Number of Notifications on Form 11 (of discharge of case from Institution).
    Poor Law Institutions.Sanatoria.Poor Law Institutions.Sanatoria.
  • Page 82
    The following- comparative figures for recent years show that tuberculosis is becoming less prevalent in Shoreditch :—
    Year.Total Number Primary Notifications.Notifications per 1,000 Inhabitants.
    Pulmonary.Non-Pulmonary.All forms.
  • Page 82
    Particulars of new cases of tuberculosis and of all deaths from the disease in Shoreditch during 1932 are given in the following table :_
  • Page 83
    The interval elapsing between notification and death is an indication of the efficiency of notification. In the following table the deaths from tuberculosis are classified according to this interval : —
    MaleFemaleTotal
    PulmonaryNon-PulmonaryPulmonaryNon-Pulmonary
  • Page 84 85
    THE DEATHS FROM TUBERCULOSIS NUMBERING 101, ARE CLASSIFIED AS TO SITE OF DISEASE AND WARD IN THE FOLLOWING TABLE DEATHS FROM TUBERCULOSIS IN THE BOROUGH DURING 1932.
    AGES.DEATHS IN EACH WARD.SEX.DEATHS.
    Under 1 year.1 to 2 years.2 to 5 years.5 to 10 years.I 10 to 15 years.15 to 20 years.20 to 25 years.25 to 35 years.35 to 45 years.45 to 55 vears.55 to 65 years.65 to 75 years.75 and upwards.| Moorfields.Church.Hoxton.Wenlock.Whitmore.Kingsland.Haggerston.Acton.Male.Female.TOTAL.Not in Institutions.St. Leonard's Hospital.Other Institutions
    Belonging to Shoreditch.Not belonging to Shoreditch.Belonging to Shoreditch.Not belonging to Shoreditch.
  • Page 84 85
    The death rates per 1,000 from all forms of Tuberculosis in Shoreditch and London during the last 10 years are compared in the following table : —
    Year.Shoreditch.London.
  • Page -
    Continued from previous page...
    Previous to 19261926192719281929193019311932
    Class T.B. minusClass T.B. plusClass T.B. minusClass T.B. plusClass T.B. minusClass T.B. plusClass T.B. minusClass T.B. plusClass T.B. minusClass T.B. plusClass T.B. minusClass T.B. plusClass T.B. minusClass T.B. plusClass T.B. minusClass T.B. plus
    Condition at the time of the last record made during the year to which the return relatesGroup 1Group 2Group 3Total (Class T.B. plus)Group 1Group 2Group 3Total (Class T.B. plus)Group 1j Group 2Group 3Total (Glass T.B. plus)Group 1Group 2Group 3Total (Class T.B. plus)Group 1Group 2Group 3Total (Class T.B. plus)Group 1Group 2Group 3Total (Class T.B. plus)Group 1Group 2Group 3Total (Class T.B. plus)Group 1Group 2Group 3Total (Class T.B. plus)
  • Page 87
    Tuberculosis Scheme of the Shoreditch Metropolitan Borough Council. Return showing the work of the Dispensary daring the year 1932. Memo. 37/T (Revised).
    Diagnosis.Pulmonary.N on-pulmonary.Total.Grand Total.
    Adults. Children.Adults. Children.Adults. Children.
    M.F.M.F.M.F.M.F.M.F.M.F.
  • Page 93
    Further figures relating to the work of the Dispensary are given in the following tables: —
    1931.1932.
  • Page 93
    Special sessions for school children : These are held weekly, and the following table shows the total for each month : —
    1931.1932.1931.1932.
  • Page 96
    S tatement of A ccounts. From July 21st, 1930, to December 31st, 1932.
    Receipts.Expenditure.
    £s.d.£s.d.
  • Page 99
    After verification by the Enquiry Officer this statement is used to fix the proportion of the full charge to be paid, the remissions being 25, 50, 75 and 100 per cent., in accordance with the following income limits approved by the Council.
    No. in family.No charge to be made.To pay 25% of maximum.To pay 50% of maximum.To pay 75% of maximum.
    Sd.s.d.s.d.s.d.
  • Page 100
    A summary of the work done during the year is contained in the following tables : — Table I.—Inspection and Treatment of Children.
    No. of primary examinationsNo. of 1st Attendances for Course of TreatmentNo. of extractions (teeth)Local AnaestheticsGeneral AnaestheticsNo. of FillingsNo. of scalingsNo. of Orthodontic plates fittedOrthodontic visitsNo. of surgical operationsNo. of other operationsNo. of visits
    CompleteTemporary1st (a)Subsequent (b)
    (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)
  • Page 101
    Table II.—Inspection and Treatment of Adults.
    No. of primary examinationsNo. of 1st Attendances for Course of TreatmentNo. of extractions (teeth)Local AnaestheticsGeneral AnaestheticsNo. of FillingsNo. of scalingsNo. of dentures fittedNo. of repairs to denturesNo. of surgical operationsNo. of other operationsNo. of visits
    CompleteTemporary
    Women referred(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)
  • Page 102
    Table III.— Analysis of Visits.
    Sessions.Morning.Afternoon.Evening.Total.No. of M. &C.W. Visits.Anassthetic Sessions. Attendances.
    Women.Children.
    1stSubsequent.1stSubsequent.
  • Page 103
    A comparison of the work done each year since the Hospital was opened is contained in the following table —
    1927 From 31st Mar. Five Sessions1928 Five Sessions1929 Jan.-May Five Sessions. June-Dec. Eleven Sessions1930 Eleven Sessions1931 Eleven Sessions1932 Eleven Sessions Jan.-Nov. when new Time Table introd'c'd (see p. 97)
  • Page 106
    Finances of the Hospital. The following figures prepared by the Borough Treasurer show the general financial position of the Hospital during the last two years. A new scale of charges was introduced on April 1st, 1931.
    Jan.-Dec., 1931Jan.-Dec., 1932
    £s.d.£s.d.£s.d.£s.d.
  • Page 111
    Overcrowding, 1932.
  • Page 111
    In addition to the above the following applications were dealt with by the L.C.C.
  • Page 112
    DWELLINGS, ROOMS, AND FAMILIES
    Structurally Separate Dwellings ofNumber of Rooms
    1 Room2 Rooms3 Rooms4 Rooms5 Rooms6-8 Rooms9 or more RoomsAll SizesTotalOccupiedVacant
    Furn's'dOthers
  • Page 113
    DWELLINGS, ROOMS, AND FAMILIES
    No.%
  • Page 114
    PRIVATE FAMILIES CLASSIFIED BY SIZE OF FAMILY, ROOMS OCCUPIED AND DENSITY OF OCCUPATION
    No. of Persons in FamilyNumber Private Families occupying the following Number of RoomsTotal Private FamiliesPopulation in Private FamiliesRooms OccupiedAverage No. Persons per roomDensity of Occupation
    Population at following densities of occupation (Persons per room)
    123456-78-910 or more
    over 33 and over 22 and over 1½1½ and over 1
  • Page 116
    It is hoped that at some time in the not too distant future it may be possible for the question of home visiting to be fully considered in relation to the duties and adequacy of the staff as a whole.
    AgeNo. living 1931 CensusNo. individual Children VisitedPercentage of Children VisitedAverage No. Visits paid to each child Visited
  • Page 118
    The nursing staff comprises a matron (Miss Borrow), sister, three staff nurses and three probationers.
  • Page 118
    Particulars of attendances during the last three years are shown in the following table : —
    1930.1931.1932.
  • Page 119
    Particulars or the attendances of this Clinic since its inception are contained in the following table:—
    Year.No. of individuals treated.Total Attendances.Average No. of Attendances made per Patient.
  • Page 120
    Dental Treatment. The number of cases reported from the Welfare Centres for dental treatment since this has been available are as follows:—
    Year.First Attendances.Total Attendances.
  • Page 120
    The following are the particulars of the cases referred under this Agreement during the year:—
    193019311932
  • Page 121
    The attendances at the Sewing Classes during the last six years have been as follows:—
    28, Herbert Street.Model Welfare Centre.
  • Page 121
    The number of mothers attending for dinners during 1932 and the two preceding years are compared in the following table:—
    Model Welfare Centre.31, Herbert St.
    1930.1931.1932.1930.1931.1932.
  • Page 122
    This scale was revised in February, as follows:—
    No. in family.Net family income per head.
    Free Dinners and Milk.Half-price Dinners and Milk.
    s.d.s.d.
  • Page 124
    ALL ENTRANTS
    GirlsBoysTotalPercentage of Total
    19321931193219311932193119321931
  • Page 124
    PARTICULARS OF THE OCCURRENCE OF CERTAIN DEFECTS
    DefectGirlsBoysTotal
    193219311932193119321931
  • Page 124
    An interesting comparison may be made between the number of defective school entrants in Shoreditch and in London as a whole : —
    LONDONSHOREDITCH
    19291930193119321929193019311932 1,762
    No. of school entrants inspected76,02464,63268,28358,3452,1031,9021,982
  • Page 125
    The numbers of individual expectant mothers visited and subsequent visits paid to these during recent years are shown in the following table:—
    19251926192719281929193019311932
  • Page 126
    Particulars of attendances at these clinics during recent years are contained in the following table:—
    19251926192719281929193019311932
  • Page 129
    The Home Help is provided in those cases in which the family income per head is within the following scale:—
    Number in Family.Income per head after deduction of rent.
    Free.Half price, i.e., 6d. per hour.
    s.d.s.d.
  • Page 129
    M unicipal M idwifery. Sister Leaton whose appointment to the position of Municipal Midwife was recorded in the last report submits the following statistical report upon her work during the year:—
    Municipal CasesSt. Bartholomew's Hospital Cases
  • Page 132
    The numbers of children and attendances since the commencement of this arrangement are shown in the following table:
    YearNo. of ChildrenATTENDANCESTotal Attendances
    At Full CostAt Half Cost
  • Page 137
    Statistical Report for 52 Weeks ending 31st Dec., 1932, upon the work of The Health Visitors.
    Health Visitors' Districts.
    1234567Total.
  • Page 138
    Number of First Attendances of Infants and Children at Welfare Clinics.
    Health Visitors' Districts.
    1234567Total.
  • Page 139
    Total Attendances of Infants and Children at Welfare Clinics.
    Health Visitors' Districts.
    1234567Total.
  • Page 140
    T otal A ttendances of I nfants and C hildren at W elfare C linics— continued.
    Health Visitors' Districts.
    I234567Total.
  • Page 141
    Ante-Natal Consultations.
    Health Visitors' Districts.
    1234567Total
  • Page 142
    Child Welfare Consultations.
    Health Visitors' District No.Infants seen by Doctor.Children (1-5) yrs. seen by Doctor.
    For 1st time.Total No.For 1st time.Total No.
  • Page 144
    The attendances during Health Week were as follows:—
    Days.School Children. Morning.Evenings.Total.