London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report tables

Finsbury 1903

Report on the public health of 1903

Published
1904
Author
Newman, George.
Pages
274
Tables
102

This page requires JavaScript

102 tables in this report

  • Page 11
    Population.—The estimated population to the middle of 1903 in the Borough of Finsbury was 100,487, comprised as follows :—
  • Page 12
    The numbers of the population, of each sex and at various ages (at the Census, 1901), was as follows:—
    Totals at all ages.Under 5.5-14.15-19.20-54.55-75.Above 75.
  • Page 13
    Births.—The total number of births registered in the district during 1903 was 3664, as follows:—
    Sub-registration District.Total Births.Rate per 1,000 of the Population in 1903.
  • Page 14
    Continued from previous page...
    Boroughs.Population.Birth Rate.Death Rate.Infant Mortality.
  • Page 16
    As regards their distribution, all the deaths belonging to Finsbury may be summarized briefly as follows:—
  • Page 16
    These figures are instructive as indicating in what portions of the Borough the death rate is highest. The death rate of the Borough is, as we have seen, 19.8. The death rates of the sub-registration districts, after distribution of the extra-parochial deaths, are as follows:—
  • Page 17
    Mortality from All Causes at Subjoined Ages, 1898—1903.
    At all Ages.Under 1 Year.1 and under 5.5 and under 15.15 and under 25.25 and under 65.65 and upwards.Total Birth Rate.Total Death Rate.
  • Page 18
    The distribution in the Borough of these deaths of infants may be set out as follows:—
    Districts.Deaths of Infants under 1 year of age.Infant mortality rates per 1,000 birtbs.
  • Page 19
    Continued from previous page...
    Months.0—1—2—3—4—5—6—7—8—9—10—11—Totals
  • Page 19
    Turning now to the causes of death in these infants, we find the record is as follows:—
    Causes of Death.Diarrhoea.Prematurity.Marasmus.Bronchitis.Pneumonia.Convulsions.Suffocated in Bed.Measles.Whooping Cough.Accidents.Tuberculosis.Diphtheria. Erysipelas, Croup.Miscellaneous.Totals.
  • Page 20
    The claims of death at the two extremes of life, and the effect of season, are shown in the following table of total deaths, intra-parochial and extra-parochial:—
    Jan-MarchApril-JuneJuly-SeptOct-DecTotal
  • Page 21
    The deaths from Zymotic Diseases occurring in the Borough (intra-parochial and extra-parochial) during the year numbered 262, and were caused as follows:—
    Small-poxScarlet FeverDiphtheria and Membranous CroupEnteric FeverPuerperal FeverErysipelasMeaslesWhooping CoughDiarrhœaTotal
  • Page 22
    Finsbury, 1903. Deaths and Death Rates from all and Certain Causes in Houses or Tenements of several sizes.
    Size of Tenements.Census Population, 1901.All Causes.Zymotics.Phthisis.Respiratory Disease (excluding Phthisis).
    Deaths.Death rate per 1000.Deaths.Death rate per 1000.Deaths.Death rate per 1000.Deaths.Death rate per 1000.
  • Page 29
    For purposes of reference the returns of the Metropolitan Asylums Board as to vaccination of the 9,658 cases of smallpox is also added. From these figures it will be seen :—
    Ages.Vaccinated.Unknown.Unvaccinated.Total cases and deaths.
    Cases.Deaths.Mortality per cent.Cases.Deaths.Mortality per cent.Cases.Deaths.Mortality per cent.Cases.Deaths.Mortality per cent.
  • Page 32
    The age incidence of Diphtheria and its mortality for 1903 was as follows:—
    Ages in YearsUnder 1 year1-55-1515-2020-3030-4040-Totals
  • Page 33
    The following table shows the seasonal occurrence of the cases of Diphtheria notified to us:—
    Months.Jan.Feb.Mar.April.May.JuneJuly.Aug.Sept.Oct.Nov.Dec.
  • Page 33
    The following table illustrates the channels of infection and the sanitation of the houses in all those cases where infection could be at all traced, or the sanitation of the house was in any way open to criticism:—
  • Page 38
    The age distribution of the cases was as follows:—
    AgesUnder 55-1415-30Above 30Totals
  • Page 38
    By eating shell-fish—oysters, cockles, &c. 14
  • Page 40
    Continued from previous page
    Total No. of Doubtful Cases ExaminedCases which gave Positive ResultsCases which gave Negative ResultsCases of Typhoid notified without Bacteriological Examination
  • Page 40
    SCARLET FEVER. The total number of notifications received during the year for Scarlet Fever was 283, as against last year's 381, and 495 in 1901. The age and sex incidence was as follows:—
  • Page 41
    Continued from previous page
    YearsUnder 1 year1 and under 55 and aboveAt all Ages
  • Page 44
    We received 577 intimations of the occurrence of Measles during the year as follows:—
  • Page 45
    The age and sex incidence of the cases was as follows:—
    Under 1 year.1—5.5—10.10—15.15-Total.
  • Page 48
    Continued from previous page
    Years.No. of Deaths from Epidemic Diarrhoea.Death rate.Air Temperature in Summer Quarter.Rainfall in Summer Quarter.
  • Page 48
    The relationship between the weekly number of deaths from Epidemic Diarrhœa and the temperature, as recorded by the four-foot earth thermometer, is shown the following Table:—
  • Page 50
    Continued from previous page
    Age in months.Human Milk.Artificial or Condensed Milk.Human and Artificial.Cows' Milk.Human and Cows'.Totals.
  • Page 51
    The results of the enquiry into the conditions of life of the 416 infant deaths, irrespective of cause of death, may be set out in the following table:—
    Age in months.Human Milk.Artificial and Condensed Milk.Human and Artificial Milk.Cows Milk (Bottle).Human and Cows' Milk.Total.One room.Two rooms.Three rooms.Four rooms.
  • Page 52
    The Voluntary Notification of Phthisis.—There has been a steady and, on the whole, satisfactory rise in the number of voluntary notifications since the adoption of this system in October, 1900. Seventy notifications were received in 1901, 121 in 1902, and 219 in 1903, as follows:—
    Notified Cases.Under 10 years.10-20-30-40-50-60-Total.
  • Page 52
    Deaths from Phthisis.—The total deaths due to consumption in 1903 were 238, giving a death-rate of 2.39 per 1,000, about the average rate for the last seven years.
  • Page 54
    The results of the investigations made with regard to the history and surroundings of 129 cases of Phthisis in the Borough in 1903 are shown in the following tables:-
    Source of Infection.Notifications.Deaths.Totals.
  • Page 55
    The number of cases occurring in houses where other persons had been notified as suffering from, or had died from, Phthisis, was as follows:—
    Number of previous cases of Phthisis notified in former years, or having died in same house.Totals.
    One.Two.Three.Four.Five.
  • Page 56
    The following table shows the number of cases from houses with sanitary defects:—
    Sanitary state of house.Notifications.Deaths.Totals.
  • Page 61
    The parts of the body mainly affected with Cancerous Disease were as follows:—
    Cancer and Malignant Disease of various parts of the body.19011902.1903.Totals.
  • Page 62
    The figures are as follows:—
    Years.Alcoholism.Cirrhosis of Liver.Children laid upon.Total.
  • Page 68
    TABLE OF MEAT PROSECUTIONS, 1903.
    Date of Trial.Name and Address.Article.Where seized and Name of Inspector.Penalty and Costs inflicted.
  • Page 69
    Continued from previous page...
    Date of Trial.Address.Article.Where seized and Name of Inspector.Penalty and Costs inflicted.
  • Page 70
    Continued from previous page...
    Date of Trial.Name and Address.Article.Where seized and Name of Inspector.Penalty and Costs inflicted.
  • Page 71
    Continued from previous page...
    Date of Trial.Name and Address.Article.Where seized and Name of Inspector.Penalty and Costs inflicted.
  • Page 72
    Continued from previous page...
    Date of Trial.Name and Address.Article.Where seized and Name of Inspector.Penalty and Costs inflicted.
  • Page 73
    Continued from previous page...
    Date of Trial.Name and Address.ArticleWhere seized and Name of Inspector.Penalty and Costs inflicted
  • Page 74
    Continued from previous page...
    Date of Trial.Name and AddressArticle.Where seized and Name of Inspector.Penalty and Costs inflicted.
  • Page 75
    Continued from previous page...
    Date of Trial.Name and Address.Article.Where seized and Name of Inspector.Penalty and Costs inflicted.
  • Page 77
    Summary of Diseased and Unsound Meat, Offal, &c., confiscated during the year ending December 31st, 1903.
    Diseased.
  • Page 84
    Comparative results obtained from ordinary coppered peas are also given—
    Early June Peas.Tarantelle Coppered Peas.
    Liquid.Peas.Liquid.Peas.
  • Page 95
    The seven existing cow-houses licensed by the London County Council are situated as follows: 39a, Baldwin Street; 1, George Street; 30, Great Sutton Street; 40, Rawstorne Street; 230, St. John Street; 4, Sermon Lane; 27, Whiskin Street. The main facts, which may be stated here, are set out in the following table:-
  • Page 96
    Continued from previous page...
    No. of Cowshed.No of Cows.Cubic Capacity per cow, in cubic feet.Paving and Drainage.General Sanitation and Cleanliness.Daily Milkings.Cleanliness of Milking.Treatment of Milk.Destination of Milk.
  • Page 100
    Sanitary Condition of Milk Shops.—Out of the total of 221 milk-shops inspected in this enquiry, 116 (or 52 per cent.) were found to have one or more sanitary defects. The chief defects may be tabulated as follows:-
    Sanitary Defects.No. of Milk-shops.
  • Page 101
    The hands of the 182 general dealers. The trade appears to be distributed as follows:-
    Daily sale.No. of shops.Total barn gallons of milk sold daily.
  • Page 102
    (a) The Chemical Examination of Finsbury Milk.—The com-position of milk varies according to a variety of external circumstances, and it is, therefore, necessary to adopt a standard, The Board of Agriculture have prescribed the minimum standard, as follows: —
    Water88.50 per cent.
  • Page 103
    The Finsbury Borough Council authorize a certain number of samples of milk to be taken under the Acts and these are examined by the Public Analyst (Mr. J. Kear Colwell, F.I.C.). The following table gives the results obtained during the last ten years in the area now incorporated as the Finsbury Borough:—
    No. of Samples Analysed.No. of Samples Adulterated.Percentage of Adulterated Samples.Added Water.Percentage of Watered Milks in Samples Analysed.Removal of Fat.Percentage of Milks with fat removed on Samples Analysed.
    Under 5%5% or over.10% or over.15% or over.20% or over.Under 5%5% or over.10% or over.15% or over.20% or over.
  • Page 104
    *During the existence of the Borough Council (1901-1903) there have been prosecutions for milk adulterations resulting in convictions and penalties as follows:— MILK.
    Year.No. of Convictions.Fines amounting to.Costs amounting to.
  • Page 105
    Continued from previous page...
    Metropolitan Borough.No. of milks examined.No. found to be adulterated.Percentage of adulterations.
  • Page 106
    an exception, might bear another interpretation, but a continuously high return over 10 years is a fairly reliable indication. In 1902 this Borough had six per cent. more adulteration than the average for all London. The comparative figures for that year (the most recent obtainable) work out as follows:-
    Percentage of Milk Adulteration.
  • Page 106
    The percentages of adulteration for every five years since 1877 for England and Wales may also be added for comparative purposes:—
    MILKNo. of Samples in 1902.Percentage of Adulteration in
    1902.1901.1900.Quinquennium.
    Examined.Found Adulterated
    1897-01.1892-96.1887-91.1882-86.1877-81.
  • Page 113
    Mr. Foulerton furnished a Table of details showing the results of examination of each of the 25 milks sent to him. The following Table is an abstract of his findings :—
    Bacteria, Pus, Dirt, etc., found in Milk.No. of Milks in which found.Percentage of Total No. of Milks Examined.
  • Page 120
    The samples collected were as follows :—
    Samples taken.Adulterated.Samples taken.Adulterated.
  • Page 126
    The state of affairs existent at the time of condemnation may be set forth as follows:-
    Five Years, 1895—1899.Houses.Population.Death Rate per 1000.Deaths of Children under 5 years. Percentage on Total Deaths.
  • Page 127
    (i) Houses on the Areas.—The history of the matter as regards houses may be set out in the following way:— Dwelling-houses on the Five Areas.
    No. of Houses of all kinds at time of Scheme, 1900.No. of Dwelling-houses, 1900.No. closed previous to Scheme.No. closed in 1900.No. closed in 1901.No. closed in 1902.No. closed in 1903.Total No. now closed.No. of Dwelling- houses now occupied.
  • Page 128
    The decline in houses step by step is seen in the following table: — Dwelling-Houses Occupied at end of each Year.
    1899.1900.1901.1902.1903.
  • Page 129
    It appears that during 1903, 569 persons have left these areas for one cause or another: —
    Aylesbury Place Area.Garden Row Area.Roby Street AreaBaltic Street Area.Honduras Street Area.Total.
  • Page 142
    Continued from previous page...
    Streets.No. of Houses Closed.No. of Persons Displaced.
  • Page 143
    The total record for 1903 is as follows:—
    Houses closed in 1903.Persons Dishoused in 1903. (Approximate Number.)
  • Page 144
    Continued from previous page...
    Houses Closed.Number of Persons re-moved into Houses else-where in Finsbury.Number of Persons re-moved out of Finsbury.Total removals traced.Removals not traced.Total.
  • Page 150
    The Census Report gives the following figures in respect to the occupiers of tenements of less than five rooms:-
    Rooms in tenement.Tenements of less than 5 rooms.Persons per Tenement.
    123456789101112 or more
  • Page 151
    The results of our inspections and prosecutions in Bastwick Street are set out in the following table:—
    Date of Night Inspection in Bastwick Street.Number of Occupied Tenements Inspected.Number of Over crowded. (Bye-law 4).Percentage of Over crowding.
  • Page 152
    4. Common Lodging Houses—The following seven common lodging-houses are situated in the Borough:—
    Address.Registered Owner.Registered Number of Occupants.Average Attendance.
  • Page 154
    RETURN OF MODEL DWELLINGS
    Situation.Known As.Built.
  • Page 155
    IN BOROUGH OF FINSBURY IN 1903.
    Erected ByNo. of Blocks.No. of Tene-ments.No. of Occu-pants.
  • Page 157
    The returns for London are as follows :—
  • Page 158
    Continued from previous page...
    BOROUGH.Area in Acres.In-habited.Uninhabited.Total Houses.No. of Houses per Acre.
    In oc-cupationNot in oc-cupation
  • Page 167
    The following Table shows the various trades and occupations carried on in workshops and workplaces in the Borough of Finsbury which are now on the workshop register of this Department:—
  • Page 168
    Continued from previous page...
  • Page 169
    The following Table shows the various trades and occupations carried on in factories in the Borough of Finsbury which are now on the factory register of this department:-
  • Page 175
    Summary of Defaults and Defects in Factories, Workshops and Workplaces for which Notices were served during 1903.
  • Page 177
    The following summary of results of inspection of out-workers' homes speaks for itself:—
  • Page 202
    The following table gives a comparison of the past five years, as regards the women and children employed on the Canal Boats visiting this district:—
    Year.Boats Inspected.Persons found on Boats.Totals.Registered for.
    Men.Women.Children.*
  • Page 214
    SCHOOLS. There are in Finsbury 24 Public Elementary Schools, containing 19,166 children, as follows:—
    Schools.Infants.Boys.Girls.Totals.
  • Page 215
    Non-Notifiable Infectious Diseases in Board Schools in Finsbury, 1903.
    Schools.No. on Roll.Measles.Whooping Cough.Chicken Pox.Other Diseases.Total.
  • Page 216
    Continued from previous page...
    1st Quarter.2nd Quarter.3rd Quarter.4th Quarter.Total.
  • Page 217
    The above Table deals with articles which have been disinfected. The actual number of occupancies disinfected during 1903 are as follows:—
    Small-poxScarlet FeverDiphtheriaEnteric FeverPuerperal FeverDisinfection by requestMeasles.PhthisisTotals
  • Page 221
    Work of Sanitary Inspectors.
    Inspector Ensor.Inspector Davis.Inspector Longden.Inspector Norman.Inspector Hindhaugh.Inspector Powell.Total.
  • Page 222
    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE PUBLIC HEALTH (LONDON) ACT, 1891, AND METROPOLIS LOCAL MANAGEMENT ACT.
    Date.Name and Address of Defendant.Offence.Result./
    Jan. 8th, 1903Fred. Gebringer, 31, Great Pearl Street, SpitalfieldsPermitting overcrowding at 24, Bastwick StreetFined £1 and 2s. costs
    Do. do.Permitting overcrowding at 48, Bastwick StreetFined £1 and 2s. costs
    Do. do.Permitting overcrowding at 53, Bastwick StreetFined £5 and £2 2s. costs
    Do. do.Permitting overcrowding at 55, Bastwick StreetFined £1 and 2s. costs
    March 5thJ. Rowley, 216, Green Lanes, N.For failing to alter and amend defective drain at 59, Lever StreetFined £2 and £1 3s. costs
    May 1stPerry Bros., 4, City RoadFor failing to clear choked water-closet at 51, Little Sutton StreetWithdrawn on payment of £2 2s. costs
    May 14thL. Aaron, 14, Doughty Street, W.C.For failing to alter and amend defective drain at 35, Central StreetWithdrawn
    May 28thJ. Maley, 2, Alpha Villas, Archway Road, W.For failing to cleanse the lodging-house, 15, Galway Street, as required by the Bye-laws (see page 146)Dismissed
    J. Priestley, 1, West Street, Finsbury CircusFor failing to cleanse the lodging-house, 1, Hatfield Street, as required by the Bye-laws (see page 146)Dismissed
    Do. do.For failing to cleanse the lodging house, 14, Hatfield Street, as required by the Bye-laws (see page 146)Dismissed
    Mr. Hughes, 3. Hatfield Street, E.C.For failing to cleanse the lodging-house, 3, Hatfield Street, as required by the Bye-laws (see page 146)Dismissed
    F. Cant, 5, Hatfield Street, E.C.For failing to cleanse the lodging-house, 5, Hatfield Street, as required by the Bye-laws (see page 146)Dismissed
    May 29thHollingsworth & Collier, 1, Bishopsgate Street Without, E C.For failing to cleanse the lodging-house. 24, Nortnampton RoadFined £2 and 2s. costs
    A. H. A. Saunders, 36, Pembury Road, Lower ClaptonFor failing to cleanse the lodging-house, 24, Noble StreetFined £1 and 2s. costs
    J. W. Harris,54, Barnsbury Road, N,For failing to cleanse the lodging-house, 11, Risinghill StreetFined £2 and 2s. costs
    Mr. BusbyFor failing to cleanse the lodging-house, 30, White Lion StreetOrdered to pay 2s. costs
  • Page 223
    Continued from previous page...
    Data.Name and Address of Defendant.Offence.Result.[#/##]
    May 29thHollingsworth & Collier, 1, Bishopsgate Street WithoutFor failing to cleanse the lodging-house, 16, Collier StreetWithdrawn.
    Joseph Johnson, 49, Halton Road, Canonbury, N.For failing to cleanse the lodging-house, 5, Clerkenwell CloseFined £2 and 2s. costs.
    June 5thGeo. Chapman, 40, Queen Street, Paddington, W.For failing to cleanse the lodging-house, 53, Margaret StreetFined £2 and 2s. costs.
    Thos. Parker, 25, St. Mary Abbott's Terrace, KensingtonFor failing to cleanse the lodging-house, 21, Easton StreetFined £3 and 2s. costs.
    Wm. ReedFor failing to cleanse the lodging-house, 50, Margaret StreetFined £2 and 2s. costs.
    June 19thGeo. Lichtenberg, 129, Highbury New Park, N.For failing to cleanse the lodging-house, 43, Warren StreetFined £2 and 2s. costs.
    July 16thGeo. King, 11, Memel StreetPermitting overcrowding at 11, Momel StreetWithdrawn.
    July21thLewis Gilbert, 24, Marshall House, Golden SquareFor failing to cleanse the lodging-house, 28, Northampton RoadFined £2 and 2s. costs.
    J. W. Harris, 54, Barnsbury StreetFor failing to provide a water supply to water-closet at 20, Noble StreetFined £2 and 2s. costs.
    Thomasso Cozzi, 3, Bath CourtPermitting overcrowding at 3, Bath CourtFined £1 and 2s. costs.
    Giovanni BriagoliPermitting overcrowding at 14, Great Bath StreetFined £2 and 2s. costs.
    July 31E. Haden Fergusson, 46, Princes Road, WimbledonFor failing to cleanse the lodging-house, 40, St. Helena PlaceFined £1 and 2s. costs.
    „ 31Do. do.For failing to cleanse the lodging-house, 42, St. Helena PlaceFined £1 and 2s. costs.
    „ 31Do. do.For failing to cleanse the lodging-house, 43, St. Helena PlaceFined £1 and 2s. costs.
    „ 31J. Shenton, 100, St. John Street RoadFor failing to cleanse the lodging-house, 6, Woodbridge StreetFined £1 and 2s. costs.
    Aug. 21M. de Martini, 39, Calthorpe Street, W.C.For removing offensive matter during prohibited hours through Ray Street, &c.Fined £1 and 2s. costs.
    Sept. 11Frederick Warman, Highbury Corner, N.For failing to cleanse the lodging-house, 197, Pentonville RoadFined 10s. 6d. and 2s. costs.
    Oct. 2S. J. Owers, 71, Malmesbery Road, BowRemoving obnoxious matter during prohibited hoursFined £3 and 2s. costs.
  • Page 224
    Continued from previous page...
    Date.Name and Address of Defendant.Offence.Result.
  • Page 225
    Continued from previous page...
    Date.Name and Address of Defendant.OffenceResult.
  • Page 226
    Continued from previous page...
    Data.Name and Address of Defendant.Offence.Result.
  • Page 227
    SMOKE NUISANCES.
    Date.Name and Address of Defendant.Offence.Result.
  • Page 231
    Name of District—Metropolitan Borough of Finsbury. For Whole District.
  • Page 232
    TABLE II.
    Names of Localitiesl—The borough1—North Clerkenwell3—South Clerkenwell4—Finsbury(st luke)5—St Sepulcher.
    Year.Population estimated to middle of each YearBirths registeredDeaths at all AgesDeaths under 1 yearPopulation estimated to middle of each YearBirths registeredDeaths at all AgesDeaths under 1 yearPopulation estimated to middle of each YearBirths registeredDeaths at all AgesDeaths under 1 yearPopulation estimated to middle of each YearBirths registeredDeaths at all AgesDeaths under 1 yearPopulation estimated to middle of each YearBirths registeredDeaths at all AgesDeaths under 1 year
    abCdabCdabCdabCdabCd
  • Page 233
    TABLE III. Cases of Infectious Disease Notified during the year 1903. Borough of Finsbury.
    Notifiable DiseaseCases Notified in Whole DistictTotal Cases Notified in each LocalityNo. of Cases removed to Hospital from each Locality
    At Ages—Year12341234
    At All AgesUnder 11 to 55 to 1515 to 2535 to 6565 and upwardsNorth ClerkenwellSouth ClerkenwellFinsbury (St. Luke)St. SepulchreNorth ClerkenwellSouth ClerkenwellFinsbury (St. Luke)St. Sepulchre
  • Page 234
    TABLE IV. Borough of Finsbury. CAUSES AMD AGES AT DEATH DURING THE YEAR, 1903.
    Causes of Death.Deaths in District at subjoined AgesDeaths in Localities (at all Ages)Deaths in Public Institutions
    All agesUnder 11 and under 55 and undei 1515 and under 2525 and under 6565 and up-wardsNorth ClerkenwellSouth ClerkenwellFinsburry (St Luke)St. Sepulchre
  • Page 235
    VACCINATION RETURNS. Return for the Period January—June, 1903. Return to be made on or before 8th of February, 1904, by Mr. T. J. Garstang, Vaccination Officer of the Holborn Union, respecting the Vaccination of Children whose Births were registered in the Finsbury District, from 1st January to 30th June, 1903, inclusive. (Return made to the Board of Guardians.)
    Registration Sub-Districts comprised in the Vaccination Officer's DistrictNumber of Births returned in the "Birth List Sheets" as registered from 1st January to 30th June, 1903Number of these Births duly entered by 31st January, 1904, in Columns I, II, IV and V of the "Vaccination Register" (Birth List Sheets), viz:Number of these Births which on 31st January, 1904, remained unentered in the li Vaccination Register" on account (as shown by Report Book) of :—Number of these Births remaining on 31st January, 1904, neither duly entered in the " Vaccination Register" (columns 3. 4, 5, 6, and 7 of this Return) nor temporarily accounted for in the "Report Book" (columns 8, 9, and 10 of this Return)Number of Certifi-cates of Conscientious Objection actually received by the Vaccination Officer, irrespective of the dates of birth of the Children to which they relate, during the year 1903.
    Col 1 Success-fully Vac-cinatedCol IICol IV Number in respect of whom Certifi-cates of Con-scientious Ob-jection have been receivedCol V Dead. Unvac-cinatedPostpone-ment by Medical CertificateRemoval to Districts, the Vaccination Officer of which has been duly apprisedRemoval to Places un-known, or which cannot be reached; and Cases* not having been found
    Insus-ceptible of Vaccina-tionHad Small Pox
  • Page 236
    VACCINATION RETURNS. Total Return for 1902. Return made on or before 8th February, 1904, by Mr. T. J. Garstang, Vaccination Officer of the Holborn Union, respecting the Vaccination of Children whose Births were registered in the Finsbury District, from 1st January to 31st December, 1902, inclusive. (Return made to the Board of Guardians.)
    Registration Sub-Districts comprised in the Vaccination Officer's DistrictNumber of Births returned in the "Birth List Sheets" as registered from 1st January to 31st Dec., 1902Number of these Births duly entered by 31st January, 1904, in Columns I. II, J.V and V of the "Vaccination Register" (Birth List Sheets), viz:Number of these Births which on 31st January, 1904. remained unentered in the • Vaccination Register" on account (as shown by Report Book) of :—Number of these Births remaining on 31st January, 1904, neither duly entered in the" Vaccination Register" (columns 3. 4, 5. 6, and 7 of this Return) nor temporarily accounted for in the " Report Book" (columns 8, 9. and 10 of this Return)Total Number of Certificates of Successful Primary Vaccination at ALI AGES received during each of the calendar years 1902 and 1903
    Col 1 Successfully VaccinatedCol IICol IV Number in respect of whom Certificates of Con-scientious Objection have been receivedCol V Dead, UnvaccinatedPostponeinent by Medical CertificateRemoval to Districts, the Vaccination Officer of which has been duly apprisedRemoval to Places unknown, or which cannot be reached ; and Cases not having been found
    Insusceptible of VaccinationHad Small Pox
    19021903
  • Page 242
    Foreigners Enumerated in Holborn Registration District 1861-1891, and Metropolitan Boroughs of Holborn and Finsbury in 1901.
    Where Born.1861.1871.1881.1891.1901.
    Finsbury.Holborn.
  • Page 246
    In respect of Italy we have obtained the original home of 1,003 Italians resident in Finsbury, and the exact locality of their residence in Finsbury, as follows:—
    Italian Origin.Finsbury Italian Quarter.Elsewhere in Finsbury.Total.
  • Page 248
    Occupation of Italians resident in Finsbury in 1903.
    Occupation.Italian Colony.Elsewhere in Finsbury.Total.
  • Page 257
    Death Rates in Italian Quarter. As an illustration of the differences which obtain between the Italian and the native population in Finsbury, the following returns respecting the Italian Quarter may be given :—
    Population (approximate)No. of Deaths.Death Rates.No. of Births.Birth Rates.Deaths of Infants under 1 year of age.Infantile Death Rate.
  • Page -
    Proceedings during 1903.
    Premises.Number of Places—Number of inspections. 1903.Number of notices, 1903.Number of prosecutions, 1903.
    On register at end of 1902.Added in 1903.Removed in 1903.On register at end of 1903.
  • Page -
    Inspection of Factories, Workshops and Workplaces.
    Class of Works.Number of Places.Number of Inspections, 1903.Number of Notices, 1903.Number of Prosecutions, 1903.
    On Register at end of 1902.Added in 1903.Removed in 1903.On Register at end of 1903.
    Premises.Rooms.
  • Page -
    Matters dealth, with in connection with Factories, Workshops and Workplaces.
    Particulars.Number ok Defects.Notices IssuedProsecutions
    FoundNotified by Home OfficeRemediedNotified to Home Office
  • Page -
    List of Outworkers (s. 107).
    Class of HomeworkNumber of Lists Received, 1903.Number ok Addresses of Out-workers
    Up to Feb. 1stUp to Aug. 1stForwarded to other AuthoritiesReceived from other Authorities
    No. of ListsNo. of OutworkersNo. of ListsNo. of Outworkers