London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

City of London 1906

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Port of London]

This page requires JavaScript

Continued from previous page...

Date.Name of Vessel.Owner and Address.
1906. July 4"Rose of England," of Rochester, 27,777.A. J. Knight, "Woodcroft," Rochester.
Aug. 17"Sarah Ann," of Rochester, 712J. Rawlinson, 9, St. Bartholomew's Road, East Ham.
Sept. 5"Beaumont Belle," of London, 102,894.H. Lawrence, 26, Belgrave Street, Stepney, E.
” 6"Astrild," of London, 110,162E. J. and W. Goldsmith, Ltd., Grays, Essex.
” 19"Blue Bell," of Rochester, 58,431J. Little, Strood Hill, Strood, Kent.
Oct. 1
” 2"Scarboro'," of Rochester, 76,595A. Jackson, c/o Mr. Harris, Rampart Street, Shoeburyness.
” 2"Acorn," of Faversham, 27,620W. G. Luckhurst, 38, South Road, Faversham.
” 4"Trio," of Rochester, 110,966Wakeley Bros., Ltd., Rainham, Kent.
” 16"Harry," of Rochester, 76,581G. Wood, The Limes, Southfleet, near Gravesend.
Nov. 7"George and Jehu," of London, 44,859.J. Rawlinson, 9, St. Bartholomew's Road, East Ham.
” 22"Alexandra," of LondonJ. Rayfield, 16, Milton Road, Gravesend.
” 28"Stag," of London, 60,862C. Murrell, 5, Albion Place, Black friars Bridge, S.E.
” 28"Our Boys," of Rochester, 81,861Ditto.
” 28"Hope," of Rochester, 84,411Ditto.
” 29" Jane," of Rochester, 21,169Ditto.
” 30" Moretta," of Rochester, 84,402A. H. Lavers, Ltd., Nine Elms, S.W.
Dec. 5"James," of Maldon, 58,309A. B. Parker, Bradwell, Essex.
” 8"Honduras," of Rochester, 106,515Wakeley Bros.,Ltd.,74,Bankside,S.E.

OFFENSIVE CARGOES.
The number of infringements against the Bye laws relating to Offensive
Cargoes reported during the year was 20.
One case was of somewhat unusual interest, the facts being as follows:—
On the 23rd June, the s.s. "Pomeranian," of Glasgow, 85,193, arrived in
the Surrey Commercial Dock, having landed cattle at Havre, the cattle dung
and fittings remaining on board.
The dung was removed into a barge named the "William Howard," of
Rochester, 44,594, but the Customs, acting under an order of the Board of
Agriculture, refused to allow it to be landed in this country, or for the barge
to be removed from the Dock.