Hints from the Health Department. Leaflet from the archive of the Society of Medical Officers of Health. Credit: Wellcome Collection, London
[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Hounslow]
This page requires JavaScript
Anencephalus | 1 |
Hydrocephalus | 3 |
Microcephalus | 1 |
Spina bifida | 6 |
Accessory auricle | 1 |
Defects of ear NOS | 1 |
Cleft lip | 6 |
Cleft palate | 5 |
Rectal and anal atresia | 3 |
Other defects of heart and great vessels | 1 |
Congenital heart disease NOS | 6 |
Defects of respiratory system NOS | 2 |
Other defects of kidney and ureter | 1 |
Hypospadias | 3 |
Other defects of male genitalia | 3 |
Defects of uro-genital system NOS | 1 |
Polydactyly | 5 |
Dislocation of hip | 1 |
Talipes | 23 |
Other defects of hand | 2 |
Other defects of pelvic girdle and lower limb | 2 |
Defects of lower limb NOS | 1 |
Defects of skull and face | 1 |
Spinal curvature | 1 |
Defects of muscles | 2 |
Other defects of skin (including | |
ichthyosis congenita) | 4 |
Exomphalos | 1 |
Mongolism | 5 |
Multiple malformations NOS | 1 |
NOS—Not otherwise specified |
For our own purposes, the only children we
follow up are those whose defect is likely to be a
handicap to them in their future progress.
As the notifications are made within the first
48 hours of birth, often before a doctor has
examined the baby, it is possible that a
considerable number of congenital defects are not
notified by this method, notably such conditions
as pyloric stenosis, fibrocystic disease, various
congenital heart defects and various renal defects.
We therefore still rely upon the hospital
paediatricians for their co-operation with regard
to notifying these defects.
Observation Register
I am grateful to Dr D G Gooding for the
following preliminary report—
'In the summer of 1965 a scheme was developed
in liaison with the consultant obstetricians and
paediatricians at the West Middlesex Hospital
and Chiswick Maternity Hospital whereby the
department health was given access to hospital
obstetric records.
The hospitals state on their birth notification
form whether or not they consider that any child
born may need further observation due to pre,
peri or post natal hazard, and therefore is at
greater risk than normal of developing a handicap.
Between June 1965 and the end of December
1966 a total of 1666 children were notified as
being in need of further observation. It is
interesting that only about 898 of these cases were
actually followed up at local infant welfare
clinics.
39