London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

Chigwell 1939

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Wanstead and Woodford]

This page requires JavaScript

The samples of milk taken for bacteriological examination under the Milk (Special Designations) Order, 1936, show the following results:-

NoDesignationsResult of ExaminationRemarks
16Tuberculin TestedSatisfied methylene blue reduction test.Satisfactory
17
18„ „Did not satisfy test.Unsatisfactory
4Tuberculin Tested (Certified)Satisfied methylene blue reduction test.Satisfactory
14
3Tuberculin Tested (Pasteurised)160 bacteria per ml.
1Pasteurised9,000 „ „ „
27,200 „ „ „
1514,000 „ „ „
192,700 „ „ „

With regard to the unsatisfactory sample, No. 18, this matter
was subsequently taken up by the Essex County Council with the
producer of the milk.
Examination of Ordinary Milk-

The following table shows the results of nine samples of ordinary milk subjected to bacteriological examination and animal inoculation test for tubercle bacilli:-

NoNo. of Bacteria per 1 mlPresence of Bacillus Coliform in 0.01 ml.Presence of Tubercle BacilliRemarks.
545,000AbsentConsidered freeSatisfactory
66,000AbsentConsidered freeSatisfactory
730,000AbsentConsidered freeSatisfactory
812,000AbsentConsidered freeSatisfactory
929,000AbsentConsidered freeSatisfactory
10600,000PresentConsidered freeUnsatisfactory
11500,000PresentConsidered fr^eUnsatisfactory
12260,000PresentConsidered freeUnsatisfactory
134,000AbsentConsidered freeSatisfactory

It will be observed from the above table that
tubercle bacilli was absent from all samples.
Particulars relating to the three unsatisfactory
samples showing excessive bacteria count, were forwarded to the
authorities concerned with the production of the milk, and the
co-operation of their Inspectors obtained with regard to adverse
conditions affecting the milk supply on the producer's premises.
(b) Food and Drugs (Adulteration) Act, 1928. and Food and
Drugs Act, 1938.
Twenty-one samples of milk were submitted far
analysis and the reports received on these samples from the
Public Analyst were in every case genuine.
Twelve samples of food procured under the Food &
Drugs Act, 1938 were also submitted for analysis, and were
reported upon by the Public Analyst as being genuine.
16.