Hints from the Health Department. Leaflet from the archive of the Society of Medical Officers of Health. Credit: Wellcome Collection, London
[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Hayes]
This page requires JavaScript
Premises. | Number of | ||
---|---|---|---|
Inspections. | Written Notices. | Occupiers Prosecuted. | |
Factories (including Factory Laundries) | 39 | 5 | Nil |
Workshops (including Workshop Laundries) | 35 | 4 | |
Workplaces (other than Outworkers' premises) | 2 | Nil | |
Total | 76 | 9 |
Particulars. | Number of Defects. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Found. | Remedied. | ||
Nuisances under the Public Health Acts:— | |||
Want of cleanliness | 2 | ||
Want of ventilation | Nil | Nil | |
Overcrowding | Nil | Nil | |
Want of drainage of floors | Nil | Nil | |
Other nuisances | |||
Sanitary accommodation | Insufficient | 6 | |
Unsuitable or defective | 4 | ||
Not separate for sexes | Nil | Nil | |
Offences under theFactory and Workshop Acts:— | |||
Other offences | Nil | Nil | |
Total |
Ten fish friers and four fat extractors are licensed by the
Council. Regular inspections have been made and the trade is
conducted satisfactorily.
RAG FLOCK ACTS, 1911 and 1928.
There are no places where rag flock is used.
SCHOOLS.
The usual notification of infectious disease was made to head
teachers of schools and to the School Medical Officer.
15