London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

Coulsdon and Purley 1950

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Coulsdon]

This page requires JavaScript

It should certainly not deter parents from agreeing to immunisation
against diphtheria, which treatment will only be given
if the time is considered opportune by the doctor concerned.
DIPHTHERIA IMMUNISATION.

The following table shows the treatment given during 1950, and the proportion of children estimated to have been immunised in that year:—

Centres and Clinics (including day nurseries).
Number of sessions held during the year183
Number commenced treatment250
Number who completed treatment286
Number of "Booster" doses given95
Total number of attendances631
Schools.
Number of visits made6
Number commenced treatment5
Number completed treatment23
Number of "Booster" doses given29
General Practitioners.
Number completed treatment313
Number given "Boosters"141
Proportion of children estimated to have been immunised:—
(a) from 1-5 years48.7%
(b) from 5-14 years89.6%

The above figures indicate a decrease in immunisation
compared with the corresponding figures in 1949, but while to
some extent this decrease was probably due to fear caused by
the press publicity on the suggested asssociation between immunisation
and the paralysis of poliomyelitis, in part it represents
the postponement of "boosting" treatment until early in 1951,
which was a reasonable precaution in the circumstances.
The percentage of the children aged I to 5 years, who
were estimated to have been immunised was the same as in
the previous year, but the proportion of school children who
had been treated probably increased by 1 per cent.
To repeat, it is incumbent upon parents to co-operate in
ensuring that diphtheria is not allowed to reappear in our midst.
27