Hints from the Health Department. Leaflet from the archive of the Society of Medical Officers of Health. Credit: Wellcome Collection, London
[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Coulsdon]
This page requires JavaScript
77 samples were submitted for bacteriological examination with the
results set out in the following tables:—
Tests required by Milk (Special Designations) Regulations 1936 to 1946, and the Heat-Treated Milk (Prescribed Tests Order, 1944.
Number of Samples. | Methylene Blue. | Phosphatase. | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Satisfactory. | Unsatisfactory. | Satisfactory. | Unsatisfactory. | |
Pasteurised: 19 | 17 | 2 | 18 | 1 |
Heat-Treated : 40 | 38 | 2 | 39 | 1 |
Examination of Raw Milk.
Number of Samples. | Methylene Blue. | Coliform Bacillus. | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Satisfactory. | Unsatisfactory. | Satisfactory. | Unsatisfactory. | |
14 | 13 | 1 | 9 | 5 |
Biological Examination.
Number of Samples. | Tubercle Bacilli positive. | Tubercle Bacilli negative. |
---|---|---|
4 | - | 4 |
The results of the biological examinations were entirely satisfactory,
as also, in almost every case, were the Pasteurised and Heat-treated samples.
The condition of the raw milk was less satisfactory and steps were taken
to improve conditions following each bad sample.
Milk (Special Designations) Regulations, 1936/46.
Licences to sell milk under the above Regulations were issued as
follows:—
Dealers:
Tuberculin Tested | 5 |
Pasteurised | 10 |
Supplementary: | |
Tuberculin Tested | 3 |
Pasteurised | 4 |