London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

London County Council 1911

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for London County Council]

This page requires JavaScript

50
Annual Report of the London County Council, 1911.
culossi of the udder he may take samples of the milk of such cow. If it appears 10 the Council that
tuberculosis is caused, or is likely to be caused, to persons residing in the County from the consumption
of milk from any dairy, or from any cow kept therein, the Council may make an order prohibiting
the supply of such milk in the County until the order has been withdrawn, and any person contravening
the order is liable to a penalty not exceeding £5, and for a continuing offence to a daily
penalty not exceeding 40s. Appeal may be made against the Council's order.
On 11th February, 1908, the Council delegated to the Public Health Committee the authority
conferred by Part IV. of this Act, dealing with tuberculous milk, and fixed the 1st July, 1908,
as the date upon which the Act should become operative. The method of procedure adopted is as
follows : Samples are taken by the Council's inspectors from churns of milk consigned from the
country to the various London railway termini, and these are submitted to the Lister Institute for
bacteriological examination. In the case of those samples in respect of which the examination proves
that there is evidence of the presence of tubercle bacilli, a clinical examination of the cows at the dairy
farm from which the milk is consigned is made by a veterinary inspector appointed for the purpose
under the Act, and cows found to have tuberculous udders are certified for the purposes of the Dairies
and Cowsheds Orders and copies of the certificates forwarded to the local sanitary authorities concerned.
During the year 1911, 3,038 samples of milk were taken. The milk had been sent to London
from the following counties : Bedfordshire, Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, Cambridgeshire, Cheshire,
Cornwall, Derbyshire, Devonshire, Dorsetshire, Essex, Gloucestershire, Hampshire, Herefordshire,
Hertfordshire, Huntingdonshire, Kent, Leicestershire, Lincolnshire, Middlesex, Norfolk, Northamptonshire,
Northumberland, Nottinghamshire, Oxfordshire, Rutlandshire, Shropshire, Somersetshire,
Staffordshire, Suffolk, Surrey, Sussex, Warwickshire, Wiltshire, Worcestershire and Yorkshire; the
samples were taken principally from churns at stations of the Great Western, the Great Eastern, the
Great Northern, the Great Central, the Midland, the Metropolitan, the London, Brighton and South
Coast, the London and North-Western, the London and South-Western, the North London, and the
South-Eastern, Chatham and Dover Railway Companies.

The following table shows the number of samples taken during the year under review, the counties from which they were derived, and the resultsofbacteriological examination at the Lister Institute.

County.No. of samples taken from churns for examination.No. of samples found to be tuberculous.No. of samples found not to be tuberculous.No. of samples the examina-tion of whichwas notcompleted owing to accident andother causes.
Bedfordshire602544
Berkshire15571426
Buckinghamshire138412113
Cambridgeshire14491
Cheshire1679
Cornwall33
Derbyshire320592529
Devonshire11
Dorsetshire462395
Essex121111055
Gloucestershire12761165
Hampshire767663
Herefordsliire11
Hertfordshire629476
Huntingdonshire835
Kent15591
Leicestershire3063126510
Lincolnshire21192
Middlesex936
Norfolk55
Northamptonshire15491387
Northumberland11
Nottinghamshire332292
Oxfordshire12581125
Rutlandshire11
Shropshire15393
Somersetshire2471619833
Staffordshire2013815112
Suffolk15-1233
Surrey211191
Sussex60753
Warwickshire796703
Wiltshire5624849222
Worcestershire1010
Yorkshire1010
Total3,0382982,579161