London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

London County Council 1911

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for London County Council]

This page requires JavaScript

Report of the Medical Officer (Education).
145
The results both of this test and the next improve with age and especially with the out of school
occupations if by any chance they involve practical dealing with small sums. In the giving of change
the results were:—
Age—7 .8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Total
Correct— — — 4 2 6 12 11 9 44
Incorrect 4 6 10 13 11 26 41 22 13 146
The children were given a few coins and then a coin, say 2s., was offered for an imaginary
transaction to cost, say 6d., and the hand held out for the change. The results show a great falling off
from those of counting alone ; they vary nearly directly with age, but are at their best at 14 +. To
count the correct result the child must actually hand over the required amount, not merely say it.
According to Binet, who is confirmed by Goddard and others, a few 7's, about one-third of 8's, and
all 9 year olds should pass this test. The more advanced children were given simple sums either as
mental or written arithmetic. Practically their limit was easy sums in the four simple rules and perhaps
very easy addition or subtraction of money. The results appeared to be below their stated school
performances, and the time taken was longer than that of very much younger normal children. The
method of asking a child its age and then how old it would be in two, three, or more years, and how
old it had been two, three or more years ago was tried in nearly every case.

No case was counted as a failure in the following table unless it was unable to give its age plus or minus two years—

Age.Age in two year's time.Age two years ago.
Succeeded.Failed.Succeeded.Failed.
7-3-3
8-7-7
9313313
10137911
1168410
1220131221
1341162532
143221915
151481111
Total 1297783123

The series of tests associated with the names of Binet and Simon were tried on 33 children,
partly as a check on the other methods and partly to experiment with their suitability for adoption as a standard.

Several isolated tests belonging to this series are included in the group already mentioned, but the standard required for success was not always the same, so that the accompanying table of results refers only to those in whom the series was worked through—

Succeed.Fail.
78910111213147891011121314
(a) 3 years old.
1. Cognisance of real objects by name47772321--------
2. Memory for 5 syllables47772321--------
3. Memory for 2 digits47772321--------
4. Recognition of objects in a picture47772321--------
5. Knowledge of family name47772321--------
(b) 4 years old.
6. Knowledge of own sex46672321-11-----
7. Naming familiar objects47772321--------
8. Memory for 3 digits46752321-1-2----
9. Comparison of 2 lines differing length44762321-3-1---
(c) 5 years old.
10. Comparison of weights11221121365512--
11. Copying a square'266323212114----
12. Replacing triangular blocks255122212226-1--
13. Counting 4 objects154523213232----
(d) 6 years old.
14. Knowing right from left15472321323-----
15. Memory for 16 syllables--------47772321
16. Aesthetic judgment265713212121---
17. Definition of objects by their use-24322214534-1--
18. Execution of triple order-3321221444511--
19. Knowledge of own age46652321-112----
20. Knowing morning and afternoon325622211 •021-1-1

12532
T