London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

London County Council 1905

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for London County Council]

This page requires JavaScript

Continued from previous page...

Sanitary area.Comparative case rates (London case rates taken as 100).
1891.1892.1893.1894.1895.1896.1897.1898.1899.1900.1901.1902.1903.1904.1905.
Finsbury11882130818611217016393741071007694100
City of London591306049517471606889961616510650
Shoreditch12489131958097103801031111048376100114
Bethnal Green15423018116814311414410089115133104112206164
Stepney1061321121231571501289389107104113106169150
Poplar19114821415917913314110583141137117147250207
Southwark71721161138610610215120714110011310087107
Bermondsey686084126809997901771339391769493
Lambeth8897918388748310312110463706569100
Battersea14412313212297811251781167059741068179
Wandsworth74838479605110011499747413512410093
Camberwell696567112140180154102156130122113826364
Deptford72688615322511314113212111114410424110693
Greenwich604384851371898210512289747812494100
Lewisham487482705712285127170126851301185679
Woolwich326866668196918610011567918881157
London100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100

Diphtheria showed decline in 1905 both in respect of prevalence and fatality. Of the 29 districts
in the county in only five was there excess of diphtheria mortality in 1905 over that of 1904, in almost
all the other districts there was decline. In the eastern districts the death-rates were highest, but
showed an improvement on the rates of the preceding year.
Dr. Kerr states (see Appendix II., page 27), that eight departments were closed (four infants'),
and one girls' class during the year ended March, 1906, on account of the occurrence of diphtheria
among the scholars.
Increased prevalence due to spread of disease through school attendance is mentioned in some
of the reports of medical officers of health. Thus in Poplar it became necessary to close the infant
and girls' departments of the Monteith-road school in the month of July. Prevalence of diphtheria
among the children attending the Mitcham-lane school, Wandsworth; a school in the neighbourhood
of Charlton, Greenwich; and the Church Manorway, Eglinton-road, and Union-street schools,
Woolwich, are referred to. The practice of bacteriological examination of material from children
exposed to infection, and the exclusion of children found to harbour the Klets-Loeffler bacillus was
carried out, but in the case of the Eglinton-road school it became necessary finally to close
the school. Dr. Davies states that this brought the outbreak to an end. Dr. Brown
reports that the plan instituted in Bermondsey of examining all diphtheria contacts among
children before permitting them to return to school has been continued unaltered. Children found
to be harbouring the diphtheria bacillus are excluded from school and the parents are advised
to secure the treatment of the throats of the children. The County Council has recently recognised
the principle that children harbouring the Klebs-Loeffler bacillus should be excluded from school as
possibly infective, and has authorised the Education Committee to refuse during the presence of
diphtheria in any district re-admission to school of children excluded on account of diphtheria or sore
throat until such children shall have obtained a medical certificate of freedom from infection based on
a bacteriological examination.
In connection with the more systematic examination of the throats of children attending school,
Dr. Sidney Davies points out that this has added to the number of notified cases of diphtheria
occurring in Woolwich, cases of so mild a character that they would otherwise have escaped
detection, with the result that the notified cases were numerous, although the deaths few. It is
necessary to bear in mind the effect which this procedure necessarily has upon the fatality rate,
which is calculated on the cases notified and deaths resulting from diphtheria.
In many of the reports the number of instances is stated in which there was examination at the
public expense of material fro m the throats of persons suspected to be suffering from diphtheria. The
following show these numbers with the results obtained:—Paddington 36, 8 positive; Fulham 191,
42 positive; Westminster 102, 24 positive; St. Marylebone 42, 14 positive; St. Pancras 91,
24 positive; Islington 147, 61 positive; Stoke Newington 47, 21 pssitive; Hackney, 93, 42 positive;
Holborn, 13, 11 positive; Finsbury 61, 12 positive; Shoreditch 32, 5 positive; Poplar 293,64
positive; Bermondsey, 108, 20 positive; Lambeth 1,644, 111 positive; Battersea 165, 50 positive;
Wandsworth 174, 51 positive; Deptford 71, 30 positive; Greenwich 119, 31 positive; Lewisham 106,
34 negative; Woolwich 712, 102 positive. In these districts, therefore, there were 4,247 examinations,
and of these 757 or 17.8 per cent, gave positive results. These examinations do not include those that
were made in the laboratory of the County Council in the Education offices.
In connection with the question of the relation of school attendance to the spread of infection,
it has been thought well to include, as in previous reports, a table showing the reduction in the
prevalence of the disease among persons of school age during the summer holiday when the schools are
closed. The summer holiday of the schools of the London County Council began on Thursday,
the 27th July, i.e., the latter part of the 30th week, and the schools re-opened on Monday, the 28th
August, i.e., the beginning of the 35th week. If the number of cases in the four weeks preceding and