London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

London County Council 1905

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for London County Council]

This page requires JavaScript

The following table enables comparison to be made of the death-rates of London with the death-rates of several foreign cities1:— All causes—Death-rates per 1,000 persons living.

Towns.1895-1904.1905.Towns.1895-1904.1905.
London18.2215.62St. Petersburg25.925.0
Paris19.217.4Berlin17.817.2
Brussels16.714.5Vienna20.419.3
Amsterdam15.913.8Rome19.120.6
Copenhagen17.316.3New York20.218.3
Stockholm16.515.9

It will be seen that in the decennium 1895-1904 the London death-rate was exceeded by the
death-rates of Paris, St. Petersburg, Vienna, Rome and New York, and in 1905 was lower than that
of any except Brussels and Amsterdam.
The following table shows the crude death-rates, and the death-rates corrected for differences
in the age and sex constitution of the population of the several sanitary districts during the year
1905; the mean death-rates for the period 1901-48 are also shown for the purposes of comparison.

Crude and corrected death-rates,4per 1,000 persons living, in the County of London, and theseveral sanitary districts.

Standard death-rate.Factor for correction for age and sex distribution.Crude death-rate.Corrected death-rate.Comparative mortality figure (London, 1,000).
1901-4.1905.1901-4.1905.1901-4.1905.
England and Wales18.191.0000
London17.311.051116.415.117.215.91,0001,000
Paddington17.041.067714.013.314.914.2866893
Kensington16.881.077814.714.015.815.1919950
Hammersmith17.471.041415.813.916.514.5959912
Fulham17.391.046215.615.116.315.8948994
Chelsea17.561.036116.614.817.215.31,000962
Westminster, City of16.221.121714.813.516.615.1965950
St. Marylebone17.081.065216.915.518.016.51,0471,038
Hampstead16.131.128010.49.311.710.5680660
St. Pancras17.401.045617.615.818.416.51,0701,038
Islington17.511.039115.514.516.115.1936950
Stoke Newington17.431.043813.112.913.713.5797849
Hackney17.461.042014.914.015.514.6901918
Holborn16.901.076619.617.521118.81,2271,182
Finsbury17.571.035521.519.022.319.71,2971,239
City of London16.551.099318.017.419.819.11,1511,201
Shoreditch17.341.049320.619.721.620.71,2561,302
Bethnal.green18.011.010219.718.619.918.81,1571,182
Stepney17.411.0450.19.717.720.618.51,1981,164
Poplar17.641.031419.017.619.618.21,1401,145
Southwark17.411.045020.318.521.219.31,2331,214
Bermondsey17.761.024420.018.720.519.21,1921,208
Lambeth17.631.032016.414.916.915.4983969
Battersea16.961.072815.014.516.115.6936981
Wandsworth17.251.054713.212.613.913.3808836
Camberwell17.541.037315.413.716.014.2930893
Deptford17.311.051116.014.316.815.0977943
Greenwich17.821.021014.613.414.913.7866862
Lewisham17.461.042012.411.712.912.2750767
Woolwich17.021.069014.412.815.413.7895862

With regard to the foregoing table, it may be stated that a more accurate method of correcting
for diSerences in the age and sex constitution of the populations compared than that adopted, i.e., the
calculation of an age and sex factor, is that of applying the death.rates at each age-period to a standard
population. The method adopted, however, has the advantage of easier application and involves less
arithmetical labour, inasmuch as the factor when calculated may be applied each year during an intercensal
period; the method also has the advantage of being applicable where the death-rates at the
several age-periods are not obtainable. The difference in the results obtained from the use of the tw o
methods in question is, however, so slight as to be negligible for practical purposes where the age and
sex distribution of the populations compared are not markedly abnormal, thus the London death-rate
1 All death-rates in this report relating to foreign cities are calculated upon figures publishen by the registrar
General.
2 See footnote (2), page 9.
3 Owing to the changes consequent upon the London Government Act, 1899, the death-rates in the present
metropolitan boroughs cannot be shown prior to the year 1901. .... ...
4 All death-rates in this report relating to metropolitan sanitary districts are fully corrected for institutions
(see footnote (1), page 9).