Hints from the Health Department. Leaflet from the archive of the Society of Medical Officers of Health. Credit: Wellcome Collection, London
[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Lewisham District]
This page requires JavaScript
The following Sewers have, within the same time (from 1st January, 1857, to 25th March, 1858,) been constructed by private individuals:—
locality of work. | length in feet. | size. | materials. | by whom constructed. |
---|---|---|---|---|
A branch from the sewer in Stanstead Lane, up a new road (unnamed), on the north side thereof, nearly opposite Bramble Lane | 440 | 18 inch | Half-brick | Mr. J. Skilbeck |
On the south side of Rock Hill from a point near the end of Jews "Walk to the Laurie Road1 | 522 | 18 inch | C. Millington, Esq. Capt. Weller G. Wythes, Esq. | |
On two new roads (un-named), on Matthew Hill's estate, near Lewisham Bridge | 360 | 3ft. by 2ft. | Half-brick Pipe | The Trustees of Matthew Hill, deceased. |
Same | 520 | 12 inch | ||
Same | 380 | 9 inch | ||
Lewisham Park | 400 | 3ft. by 2 ft. | Brick | The Earl of Dartmouth. |
In several instances the Board have been called upon to build
Sewers which they have thought ought, like the above, to be constructed
at the expense of the owners of the property to be peculiarly
benefitted. They have, therefore, declined to undertake them,
unless the cost be contributed by the owners. Of this class are
Sewers required for the drainage of Grote's Buildings, Eliot Yale,
and the adjacent property, the Paragon Mews, Montpelier Place,
Bath Place, &c., Abion Terrace, Sydenham, &c. &c. In all these
cases the necessity for Sewers is fully admitted, the only question
being whether they should be constructed at private or the public
expense.
The legal proceedings instituted against the Board by the representatives
of the late Mr. Stainton, with a view to compel the reconstruction
of the Sewers at Rushey Green, so as to restore the
water on their premises, having terminated in the dismissal of the
bill, an application was made, in March, 1857, to this Board and
the Metropolitan Board of Works, for compensation for the injury
done to the property, with a suggestion for the appointment of an
arbitrator to assess the damage and determine how it should be
borne between this and the Metropolitan Board of Works; a proposal
which was declined by each Board, as its acceptance would
have excluded them from contesting the right of the parties
* This Sewer was originally intended (see First Report, page 19), to have been a
12 inch pipe, and constructed by the Board. Such intention was, however, departed
from, as it was found only to receive the drainage of three or four premises.
c