London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

Kensington 1920

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Kensington Borough]

This page requires JavaScript

Continued from previous page...

Cases.Visits Paid.
Tuberculosis332,071
Diphtheria Suspects25
Measles9199
Typhoid Fever278
Septicæmia137
Whooping-Cough444
Erysipelas220
Total2746,450

GRANTS TO HOSPITALS, ETC. In addition to the previously mentioned grant to the Nursing Association, the Council, during the year, gave the following subscriptions:—

£s.d.
West London Hospital10100
Kensington and Fulham General Hospital550
St. Mary's Hospital10100
Paddington Green Children's Hospital550
Kensington Dispensary and Children's Hospital550
Kensal Gospel and Medical Mission550
Chelsea Hospital for Women550
Brompton Hospital for Consumption10100
Kensington District Nursing Association550
London Mothers Convalescent Home12120
Shaftesbury Society (Ashburton Home)1000
Western Ophthalmic Hospital550
Ladbroke Road Baby In-patient Hospital20000

TUBERCULOSIS. During the year 293 cases of pulmonary tuberculosis and 114 cases of non-pulmonary tuberculosis were notified. The following Table shows the number of cases of both forms of the disease notified in the Borough and the several Wards therein during each year since 1913.

District.Years.
1913.1914.1915.1916.1917.1918.1919.1920.
The Borough849682564429543432582407
North Kensington642516423300406331445294
South Kensington186138133127137101137113
Ward Unknown212882
Wards.
St. Charles14611793751137910470
Golborne22817614710612410115088
Norland190162134791029912493
Pembridge7861494067526743
Holland3735433141353636
Earl's Court5140294035203125
Queen's Gate3417101420231615
Redcliffe3931352723163325
Brompton251516151872112

From this table, it will be seen that notifications of tuberculosis are diminishing in number
year by year. In the opinion of the two Tuberculosis Officers and the Council's Women Sanitary
Inspectors, this decreasing number of notifications is due to the fact that the disease is becoming
less prevalent. There is, however, one important point to be considered before this view can be
accepted, and that is whether the medical practitioners are notifying the cases as regularly as they
did in pre-War years. I am of the opinion that, in some cases, medical practitioners are not
strictly complying with their obligations in regard to notification under the Tuberculosis Regulations,
and I propose, at an early date, to circularise local medical men drawing attention to the
importance of their strict compliance with these Regulations and of their utilising freely the
services of the Tuberculosis Officers in order to arrive at a diagnosis as early as possible in difficult
or doubtful cases.