London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

Deptford 1915

Annual report on the health of the Metropolitan Borough of Deptford

This page requires JavaScript

Continued from previous page...

Sample No.Article.Particulars of Adulteration or Infringement.Fine.Costs.Remarks.
£s.d.£s.d.
18 TButter6 per cent, of added water ..01100100Sample taken in course of delivery. Warranty unsuccessfully pleaded. Vendor cautioned.
21 T,,4 percent. milk fat abstracted01100100
47 TDripping2 per cent. water
55 PMilk10 per cent. milk fat abstractedSummons dismissed Warranty proved Informal sample
58 S,,An artificially prepared milk_
containing fat 2 94 per cent.. solids, not fat 8 84 per cent., the solid ingredients did not possess the character of milk solids. Deficiency in fat 2 per cent.
49 T,,4 percent. milk fat abstracted_Summons dismissed.
53 T,,11 ,, ,, ,,Warranty proved do.
5ButterWater 1 per cent.in excess__Vendor cautioned
71 HMilkof legal maximum. Boric acid 0 20 per cent. 3 per cent. milk fat abstracted--Summons dismissed Warranty proved Vendor cautioned
69 S,,1 ,, ,, ,,
73 S,,3 per cent. added waterdo.
66 SY,,90 per cent. milk fat abstracted1000 100or 21 days' imprisonment
50 HSeparated MilkBoric acid 0.16 grains per pintVendor cautioned
69 H,,5 per cent. added water1000 100
73 K,,2 ,, ,, ,,do.
MilkObstruction of inspector400or 28 days' imprisonment
SUMMARY.
Fines£26130
Costs8120
Total£3550

The Board of Agriculture and Milk Prosecutions.
The Board have recently sent a circular to local authorities suggesting
"that before proceedings are instituted under the Sale of Food
and Drugs Acts on analytical evidence in respect of the sale of a sample
of milk, there should be a preliminary investigation by an officer of the
local authority, or that the milk producer should be given an opportunity
of making any explanation or representation which he may desire to
offer," this suggestion is not of recent origin, as suggestions similar to