Hints from the Health Department. Leaflet from the archive of the Society of Medical Officers of Health. Credit: Wellcome Collection, London
Report on the vital and sanitary statistics of the Borough of Lambeth during the year 1905
This page requires JavaScript
II.—CONSUMPTION NOTIFICATIONS, 1902-5. (Arranged in Registration Sub-Districts so as to shew the varying incidences).
Sub-Districts. | 1902 | 1903 | 1904 | 1905 | Total 1902-5 | Incidence Rate per 1000 Population 1902-5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Waterloo Road 1st | 32 | 23 | 19 | 22 | 96 | 1.9 |
Waterloo Road 2nd | 29 | 23 | 31 | 26 | 109 | |
Lambeth Church 1st | 39 | 52 | 58 | 28 | 177 | 2.4 |
Lambeth Church 2nd | 68 | 101 | 68 | 102 | 339 | 2.1 |
Kennington 1st | 44 | 63 | 52 | 47 | 206 | 0.9 |
Kennington 2nd | 36 | 30 | 33 | 15 | 114 | 0.7 |
Brixton | 55 | 36 | 37 | 45 | 173 | 0.5 |
Norwood | 12 | 11 | 8 | 8 | 39 | 0.3 |
Borough of Lambeth | 315 | 339 | 306 | 293 | 1253 | 1.01 |
It will be seen from the voluntary notifications received that
the disease appears to have a greater incidence on the Inner
than on the Outer Districts (whether Registration Sub-Districts
or Wards). This result was to be expected, beariug in mind the
more crowded conditions (persons in houses or houses over
area) that exist in the Inner as compared with the Outer
Districts and the different status of the inhabitants—the patients
notified being chiefly of the artisan and working class. It must
be remembered, however, that the notification of consumption is
voluntary, and that only a percentage of the cases are heard of.