London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report tables

Hackney 1922

Report on the sanitary condition of the Metropolitan Borough of Hackney for the year 1922

Published
1923
Author
Dart, G. H.
Pages
124
Tables
84

This page requires JavaScript

84 tables in this report

  • Page 19
    COMPARATIVE TABLE, YEAR 1922.
    Name of Borough.Population.Birth Rate.Zymotic Death Rate.Death Rate all causes.Infant Mortality
  • Page 20
    Table showing Estimated Population, Area and Density of the Registration Sub-Districts in Hackney at middle of 1922.
    NorthCentralSouthwestSouth-EastTotal for HackneyTotal for London
  • Page 21
    The following table gives the number of marriages and marriage-rates for the Borough of Hackney and London during the years, 1912-1922:—
    Year.Borough of Hackney.London.
    Marriages.Marriage rate.Marriage rate.
  • Page 22
    Notifications of Births (Live and Still-born) received during the year 1922.
    Year 1992.Medical PractitionersMidwives.Parents and Others.Total,
    Lire.Still.Live.Still.Live.Still.Live.Still.
    M.FM.F.M.F.VI .F.M.F.M.F.M.F.M.F.
  • Page 23
    The following table gives the number of registered births, birth-rates, etc., for the Sub-districts in the Borough:—
    Registration District of HackneyRegistration Sub-districtAll London
    NorthCentralSouthwestSouth-East
  • Page 23
    Birth-rate for the Borough, of Hackney and its Sub-Districts for the years 1912-1922 compared with that of London.
    YearBorough of HackneyNorth Sub-DistrictCentral Sub-DistrictSouth-West Sub-DistrictSouth-East Sub-DistrictLondon
  • Page 24
    Amongst the Registration Sub-districts the death-rate was lowest in the Central Sub-district (11.9 per 1,000), the highest in the South-east and South-west Sub-districts (13.1 per 1,000).
    Sub-district.Population (estimated).Total No. of Births. Uncorrected.* Birth rate. Uncorrected.Total Deaths Cor 'ted.Death-rate.Deaths under I year* Infant Mortality per 1,000 Births Uncorrected. 55
    North57,06790615872812.750
  • Page 24
    The following shows the death-rate of Hackney from all causes per 1,000, compared with London during the last decade:-
    Year.Hackney.London.Year.Hackney.London.
  • Page 25
    The relative position from a health point of view occupied by Hackney as compared with other Metropolitan Boroughs may be seen from the following table, compiled from figures supplied by the Registrar-General, showing the death-rates from all causes and the death-rate of infants under 1 year of age for the year 1922:—
    Boroughs.Death rate from all causes per 1,000 living.Deaths under 1 year tc 1,000 births.
  • Page 26
    Nett deaths from stated causes at various ages under 1 year of age.
    Cause of Death.Under 1 week1-2 weeks2-3 weeks3-4 weeksTotal under 4 weeks4 weeks and under 3 months.3 months and under 6 months.6 months and under 9 months.9 months and under 12 months.Total Deaths under 1 year.
  • Page 31
    Table showing nature of above Suicidal and Accidental Deaths in the Borough of Hackney during the year 1922.
    Nature of Suicide.No.Nature of Accidental Death.No.
  • Page 32
    TABLE I.—HACKNEY BOROUGH. Vital Statistics of Whole District during 1922 and Previous Years.
    Year.Population estimated to middle of each year.Births.Total Deaths Registered in the District.Transferable DeathsNett Deaths belonging to the District.
    Uncorrec ted Number.Nett Number.Rate.of Nonresidents registered in the District.of residents not registered in the District.Under 1 Year of AgeAt all Ages.
    Number.Rate.
    Number.Rate per 1,000 Nett Births.Number.Rate.
    12345678910111213
  • Page 34
    'Summary of Proceedings under the Vaccination Acts, 1867 to 1898, during the year 1922.
    Registration Sub-District.No. of Cases in Birth Lists received during Year.No. of Certificates of Vaccination received.No. of Certificates of Postponement owing toNo. of Certificates under Section 2 of Vaccination Act, 1898, and No. of Statutory Declarations under Section 1 of the Vaccination Act, 1907.No. of Certificates of Insusceptibility or of having had Smallpox.No. of Cases.No. of Entries in Lists sent to Public Vaccinator
    Health of Child.Condition of House.Prevalence of Infectious Disease.Parents Removed out of District.Otherwise not found.
  • Page 35
    The following table shows the distribution of scarlet fever in the respective Sub-districts of the Borough:—
    Sub-Districts.North.Central.South-west.South-east.
  • Page 36
    The following table shows the distribution of diphtheria in the respective Sub-districts of the Borough:—
    Sub-Districts.North.Central.South-west.South-east.
  • Page 37
    The table below gives the distribution of the notified cases in the Sub-districts of the Borough:—
    Sub-Districts.North.Central.South-west.South-east.
  • Page 38
    The following table shows the distribution of the disease in the Sub-districts of the Borough:—
    Sub-Districts.North.Central.South-west.South-east.
  • Page 41
    TABLE II.—HACKNEY BOROUGH. Cases of Infectious Disease notified during the year 1922.
    Notifiable Diseases.Cases Notified in whole District.Total Cases Notified in each Locality.Total cases removed to Hospital.
    At all Ages.At Ages—Years.1234
    Under 1.1 to 5.5 to 15.15 to 25.25 to 45.45 to 65.65 and upwards.North.Central.South-East.South-West.
  • Page 42
    The following table gives the distribution of the deaths from this disease in the different sub-districts of the Borough:—
    Sub-Districts.North.Central.South-west.South-east.
  • Page 42
    Below is given a table showing the number of deaths and death rates due to malignant disease in this Borough for the 10 years ending 1922:—
    Years.1913191419151916191719181919192019211922
  • Page 43
    In the following table the yearly deaths from tuberculous disease in the Borough for the last 24 years are shown, grouped in periods of three years:—
    Three year periods.Annual average number of deaths from Tuberculous Disease.Percentage decrease on the period 1898-1900.
  • Page 44
    The deaths are distributed in the sub-districts of the Borough as shown below:—
    Sub-Districts.North.Central.South-west.South-east.
  • Page 45
    Summary of Notification during the Period from 1st January, 1922, to 30th December, 1922.
    Age Periods.Notifications on Form A.Number of Primary NotificationsTotal Notifications, on Form A
    0 to 11 to 55 to 1010 to 1515 to 2020 to 2525 to 3535 to 4545 to 5555 to 65 .65 and upwardsNotifications. Primary Total
  • Page 46
    Visits paid by Tuberculosis Visitors.
    New Cases.ContactsSailors and SoldiersOther Persons.Total.Insured.Non-insured
  • Page 48
    DISPENSARY DISTRICTS. Estimated Population in Electoral Wards.
  • Page 49
    DISPENSARY DEATHS. Condition of Patient on First Attendance. Pulmonary Tuberculosis
    lit Stage.2nd Stage.3rd Stage.
  • Page 49
    ALL DEATHS FROM TUBERCULOSIS. Interval elapsing between Notification and Death.
    1920.1921.1922.
    Pul.Non-pulPul.Non-pulPul.Non-pul.
  • Page 51
    2.— The Sources of the New Cases.
    Total.Tuberculous.
  • Page 51
    3.— The Diagnosis of the New Cases.
    Diagnosis.Insured.Uninsured.Total.
    Males.Females.Children under 16.Males.Females.
  • Page 51
    4.— The Diagnosis of Contact Cases.
  • Page 52
    5.—Sputum Examinations of Insured and Uninsured Patients.
    Insured.Uninsured.Total.
  • Page 52
    6.— Other Figures.
    Insured.Uninsured.
  • Page 53
    2.— The Sources of the New Cases.
    Total.Tuberculous.
  • Page 53
    3.— The Diagnosis of the New Cases.
    Diagnosis.Insured.Uninsured.Total.
    Males.Females.Children under 16.Males.Females.
  • Page 54
    5.— Sputum Examinations of Insured and Uninsured Patients.
    Insured.Uninsured.Total.
  • Page 54
    6.— Other Figures.
    Insured.Uninsured.
  • Page 55
    Advanced Cases. The following table shows the place of death of Hackney inhabitants, and it is apparent from this table what a large proportion of deaths occur in the patients' homes.
    Place where death occurred.Pulmonary Tuberculosis.Other forms of Tuberculosis.Totals.
  • Page 56
    The number of rooms fumigated and cleansed each month is set out in the following table:— Number of rooms fumigated and cleansed each month during 1922.
    Month.Rooms fumigated.Rooms cleansed.
  • Page 57
    Articles Disinfected, 1922.
    Description of Articles.January.February.March.April.May.June.July.August.September.October.November.December.Totals.
  • Page 58
    Articles Disinfected, 1922. In addition to these there were 186 articles destroyed on request from the owners. These are set out in the following table:—
  • Page 58
    (c) Public Library Books. —During the past year 442 books from homes in which infectious diseases had occurred were disinfected. The method of disinfection of books practised is to expose the books in a closed chamber to the action of formic aldehyde gas, which is generated in a lamp from formalin tablets. Books Disinfected.
    Month.Number.
  • Page 59
    The following are the Schools from which children were sent to the Cleansing Station, with the number of baths given:—
    Schools.Number Hot Baths.Cleansed. Sulphur Baths.
  • Page 60
    Continued from previous page...
  • Page 61
    The following table gives particulars of the number, etc., of persons who were bathed and cleansed for parasitic disease at the Disinfecting Station during the year.
    January.February.March.April.May.June.July.August.September.October.November.December.Totals
  • Page 65
    Nursing Assistance. —As already stated, only a fraction of the cases are dealt with.
    No. of cases nursed.No. of visits paid.
  • Page 66
    I.—HEALTH VISITING. The following table gives details of the visits made by the Council's Health Visitors during the year:—
    Miss M. ChitsonMrs. A. RhodesMiss D, F. VidalMrs. L. E. BartholomewMiss S. LoveMiss A. RocheMiss E. D. Mann.Mrs. L. HarrisonMiss M. CockleTotals.
  • Page 67
    Conditions Found by the Visitors.
    No. of Infants visited.Method of Feeding.Separate cot provided for Infant.Use of Comforter.Home conditions.Secondary visits.
    BreastArtificial.Mixed.Yes.No.Yes.No.Satisfactory.Un satis- fac tory.
  • Page 68
    SUMMARY OF CENTRE WORK. Infant Consultation Centres.
    Centre.No. of times Centre openNo. of primary cases brought to Centre.Repeated visits to Centre.Total attendances.Total attendances of Infants under 1 year.Total attendant of children over 1 yet
  • Page 68
    Ante-Natal Welfare Centres.
    Overbury Street.Brooksby's Walk.Eton Mission.
  • Page 69
    A necessitous case being considered a patient who, by reason of poverty or other causes, is unable to pay for the treatment received, an amount equal to one-half the average cost per patient of the maintenance and administration charges for the year ended December 31st, 1920.
    Cases.Cost.
  • Page 70
    (a) Supplied free of charge to necessitous mothers :—
    £s.d.
  • Page 70
    (b) Supplied at cost price—
    £s.d.
  • Page 71
    Housing and work of sanitary inspection. Public Health (London) Act, 1891.
    Year.IntimationStatutoryLegal
    Notices.Notices.Proceedings.
  • Page 72
    These homes were inspected, with the following results:—
    No. of Homes Inspected.No. of Homes where Rooms alone were found Verminous.No. of Homes where Bedding or Clothes and Rooms were found Verminous.No. of Homes not Verminous
  • Page 72
    Rats and Mice Destruction Act, 1919. The agreement entered into between the Council and Messrs, Howard and Sons, has worked most satisfactorily throughout the year, the scale of fees payable in those cases where the persons responsible for the destruction of rats desire the work to be done by Messrs. Howard under the supervision of the Council's Sanitary Staff is as follows:—
    £s.d.
  • Page 74
    Prosecutions under the Public Health (I^ondon) Act, 1891, during the year 1922.
    Address.Complaint.Magistrate's Decision.Fine.Costs
  • Page 75
    Continued from previous page...
    Address.Complaint.Magistrate's Decision.Fine.Costs.
  • Page 76
    Continued from previous page...
    Address.Complaint.Magistrate's Decision.Fine.Cost.
  • Page 77
    Continued from previous page...
    Address.Complaint.Magistrate's Decision.Fine.Costs.
  • Page 78
    Continued from previous page...
    Address.Complaint.Magistrate's Decision.Fine.Costs.
  • Page 78
    Prosecutions under Cowsheds and Milkshops Orders, 1885-6, during the year 1922.
    91a, De Beauvoir Rd.Unregistered purveyor of milkWithdrawn£s.d.£s, d.
  • Page 79
    In 17 factories the sanitary accommodation for women was defective, unsuitable or insufficient, or not separate from that for men.
    Nuisance.Found.Abated by Workshop Inspector.Abated by District Inspector.Outstanding.
  • Page 81
    I.—INSPECTION. Including Inspections made by Sanitary Inspectors or Inspectors of Nuisances.
    Premises.Number of
    Inspections.Written Notices.Prosecutions.
  • Page 82
    2.—DEFECTS FOUND.
    Particulars.Number of Defects.Numbtr of Prosecutions.
    Found.Remedied.Referred to H.M. Inspector
  • Page 83
    home work.
    Nature of Work.Outworkers' Lists, Section 107.Outwork in Unwholesome Premises, Section 108Outwork in Infected Premises Sections 109, 110.
    Lists received from Employers.Notices served on Occupiers as to keeping or sending Lists.Prosecutions.Instances.Notices served.Prosecutions.Instances.Orders Made (Section 110).Prosecution (Sections 109. 110)
    Twice in the year.Once in tbe year.
    Failing to keep or per- mit inspec-tion of Lists.Failing to send Lists.
    Lists.Outworkers.Lists.Outworkers.
    ContractorsWorkmen.ContractorsWorkmen.
  • Page 84
    4.—REGISTERED WORKSHOPS.
    Workshops on the Register (S. 131) at the end of the year.Number
  • Page 84
    5.—OTHER MATTERS.
    Class.Number.
  • Page 85
    The following analysis shows the trades followed by these outworkers :—
    Trade.No. of Outworkers.Trade.No. of Outworkers.
  • Page 87
    Sale oj Food and Drugs Acts, 1875-1907. Samples purchased during 1922.
    Articles Purchased.Number purchasedNumber AdulteratedNumber where Proceedings taken
  • Page 88
    Prosecutions under the Sale of Food and Drugs Acts during the year 1922.
    No. of SampleArticleAdulteration or OffenceResult of Legal ProceedingsFineCosts
  • Page 92 93
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1922.
    Mr. Ellis, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew. No. 2 District.Mr. Vobe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District.Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 District.Mr. .Long, No. 8 District.Mr. Golds worthy No. 9 District. -Mr. Pererettt, No. 10 District.Mr. Hillier, No. 11 District.Mr. Crook, No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove No. 13 District,Mr. Hall, No. 14 DistrictMr. Fowler, Special.Mr. Nighy, • Special.Mr. Galvin, Special.Mr. Bobbitt, Special.Miss Teebay, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTAL.
  • Page 94 95
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1922.
    Mr. Ellis, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew. No. 2 District.Mr. Vobe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District.Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 District.Mr. Long, No. 8 District.Mr. Goldsworthy No. 9 District.Mr. Peverett,No. 10 District.Mr. Hlitter, No. 11 District.Mr. Crook, No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove No. 13 District.Mr. Hall, Mo. 14 District.Mr. Fowler, 1 Special.Mr. Nighy, Special.Mr. Galvin, Special.Mr. Bobbitt, Special.Miss Teebay, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTAL
  • Page 96 97
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1922.
    Mr. Ellis, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew. No. 2 District.Mr. Vobe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District.Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 District.Mr.Long, No. 8 District.Mr. Goldsworthy No. 9 District.Mr. Prvertt No. 10 District.Mr. Hiller No. 11 District..Mr. Crook, No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove No. 13 District.Mr. Hall, No. 14 District.Mr. Fowler, Special.Mr. Nighy, Special.Mr. Galvin, Special.Mr. Bobbitt, Special.Miss Teebay, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTAL.
  • Page 98 99
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1922.
    Mr. Ellis, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew. No. 2 District.Mr. Vobe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District.Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 District.Mr.Long, No. 8 District.Mr. Goldsworthy No. 9 District.Mr. Prvertt No. 10 District.Mr. Hiller No. 11 District..Mr. Crook, No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove No. 13 District.Mr. Hall, No. 14 District.Mr. Fowler, Special.Mr. Nighy, Special.Mr. Galvin, Special.Mr. Bobbitt, Special.Miss Teebay, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTAL.
  • Page 100 101
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1922.
    Mr. Ellis, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew. No. 2 District.Mr. Vobe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District.Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 District.Mr. .Long, No. 8 District.Mr. Golds worthy No. 9 District..Mr. Peverett, No. 10 District.Mr. H illier,No. 11 District.Mr. Crook, No.12 District.Mr. Truslove No. 13 District.Mr. Hall, No. 14 District.Mr. Fowler, Special.Mr. Nighy, Special.Mr. Galvin, Special.Mr. Bobbitt, Special.Miss Teebay, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTAL.
  • Page 102 103
    INSPECTIONS BY SANITARY INSPECTORS, 1922.
    Mr. Ellis, No. 1 District.Mr. Bew. No. 2 District.Mr. Vobe, No. 3 District.Mr. Sadler, No. 4 District.Mr. Body, No. 5 District.Mr. High, No. 6 District.Mr. Sheppard, No. 7 DistrictMr. .Long, No 8 District.Mr. Goldsworthy No. 9 District. 1No.. Peverrtt. No 10District.Mr. Hillier. No. 11 District .Mr. Crook, No. 12 District.Mr. Truslove No. 13 District.Mr. Hall, No. 14 District.Mr. Fowler, Special.Mr. Nighy. Special.Mr. Galvin, Special.Mr. Bobbitt, Special.Miss Teebay, Special.Miss Portlock, Special.TOTAL.
  • Page 104
    TABLE OF DEATHS. Of Inhabitants of the Hackney District between 1st Jan. and 31st Dec., 1922.
    AGESUnder 1 year.1 to 2.2 to 5.5 to 15.15 to 25.25 to 35.35 to 45.45 to 55.55 to 65.65 to 75.75 to 85.85 and upwards.All ages.
  • Page 105
    TABLE OF DEATHS— continued.
    AGESUnder 1 year.1 to 2.2 to 5.5 to 15.15 to 25.25 to 35.35 to 45.45 to 55.55 to 65. 165 to 75. |75 to 85.85 and upwards. 1All ages. |
  • Page 106
    TABLE OF DEATHS— continued.
    AGESUnder 1 year.1 to 2.2 to 5.5 to 15.15 to 25.25 to 35.35 to 45.45 to 55.55 to 65.65 to 75.75 to 85.85 and upwards.All ages.
  • Page 107
    TABLE OF DEATHS— continued.
    AGESUnder 1 year.1 to 2.2 to 5.5 to 15.15 to 25.25 to 35.35 to 45.45 to 55.55 to 65.65 to 75.75 to 85.85 and upwards.All ages.
  • Page 108
    TABLE OF DEATHS— continued.
    AGESUnder 1 year.1 to 2.2 to 5.5 to 15.15 to 25.25 to 85.35 to 46.45 to 55.55 to 65.65 to 75.75 to 85.85 and upwards.All ages.
  • Page 109
    TABLE OF DEATHS— continued.
    AGESUnder 1 year.1 to 2.2 to 5.5 to 15.15 to 25.25 to 35.35 to 45.45 to 55.55 to 65.65 to 75.75 to 85.85 and upwards.All ages.
  • Page 110
    TABLE OF DEATHS— continued.
    AGESUnder 1 year.1 to 2.2 to 5.5 to 15.15 to 25.25 to 35.35 to 45.45 to 55.55 to 65.65 to 75.75 to 85.85 and upwards.All ages.
  • Page 111
    TABLE III. Causes of, and Ages at, Death during the year 1922.
    Causes of Death.Deaths in whole Districts at Subjoined Ages.Deaths in Public Institutions.
    All Ages.Under 1.1 and under 2.2 and under 5.5 and under 15.15 and under 25.25 and under 45.45 and under 65.65 and upwards.