London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

Fulham 1895

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Fulham]

This page requires JavaScript

211
???rted between the house and sewer with excellent effect, but the expense of
???se is too great to be adopted for small properties. One has been fixed in
???moth Place for the drain of the Underground Convenience, and has
???ved quite effectual, although the floor of this building is well below flood
???el.
VENTILATING SHAFTS.
During the year 15 ventilating shafts have been erected (see page 258).
This makes a total of 57 ventilating shafts erected to ventilate existing
???ers since March, 1886. The benefits received from these appears to be
doubted, and the subject of ventilating the Sewers generally is receiving
???e attention.
HOUSE DRAINAGE.
The proper construction of the drainage of houses has continued to
???upy the attention of the Vestry, but the number of plans submitted shows
???ight decrease on the preceding year.

SEWERS LAID BY PRIVATE PERSONS IN 1895-96.

UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF THE VESTRY.

Case No.Road or Street.Description.Length in feetAverage d??? in feet.
E 52Felden Street12 in. pipe71011
Swift Street12 do.34511
E 5.Clancarty Road (part of)15 do.82012
Beltran Road12 do.67011
Ashcombe Road12 do.52011
Narborough Street12 do.42011
Friston Street12 do.31011
Woolneigh Street12 do.20011
Erivane Street12 do.12012
Settrington Road12 do.15009
E 36Woodlawn Road12 do55612
Macmurdo Road12 do.34712
E 42Perry mead Street (extension)12 do.86015
E 24Wardo Avenue12 do.73011
Chilkwell Street12 do.74011
Sidbury Street12 do.24010
Lambrooke Terrace12 do.53510
S 23King wood Road (extension)12 do.59112

In Schedule V. are set out the plans submitted to the Vestry and the
try decisions thereon.
COMBINED DRAINAGE.
In consequence of the decisions of the Courts as to combined drainage
???g, under certain circumstances, sewerage, and maintainable by the
???ry, several cases have been dealt with by relaying, at the Vestry's
???nse. Of course, the most serious phase of this matter is the question of
???anent maintenance which must be taken as a liability and duty of the
???ry, but when one considers the difficulties experienced in prosecuting
???thorised persons interfering or tampering with sewers in public streets
???ways, how much more difficult must it be to exercise due surveillance
???those which are in the enclosure of private premises.