London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

Marylebone 1920

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for St. Marylebone, Metropolitan Borough]

This page requires JavaScript

Continued from previous page...

Articles submitted for AnalysisState w hether the sample was submitted to the Analyst by an Officer acting under direction of a Local Authority under Section 13 of Act, and. if so, the name of such Authority.Result of Analysis ; showing whether the sample was Genuine or Adulterated, and if Adulterated what were the nature and extent of the Adulteration.The sum paid in respect of the Analysis.Observations.
Food Inspector, St. Marylebone Borough CouncilNo. 258. 16.67 per cent. deficient in milk fat£500 per annum for 700 samples. Over that number 7/6 per sample.No. 258. This was a test sample
No. 352. 10.0 do. do.No. 352. £1/11/6 costs.†
No. 356. 16.7 do. do.No. 356. This was a test sample
No. 397. 30.0 do. do.No. 397. Fined £5 and 10/6 costs
*No. 398. 6.7 do. do.*No. 398. Farmer cautioned (vide Public Health Minutes 25/6/20)
No. 424. 16.7 do. do.No. 424. Fined £5 and 10/6 costs
No. 426. 10.0 do. do.No. 426. Fined £?> and 16/6 costs
49 butterDo.Genuine25 were test samples
Two contained no preservative
44 contained between 10-20 grains boric acid per lb.
3 contained between 20-30 grains boric acid per lb.
3 margarineDo.Do.One was a test sample
Two contained between 20-30 grains boric acid per lb.
One contained between 10-20 grains boric acid per lb.
4 creamDo.Do.No. 306 contained 56.2 per cent. fat
No. 311 contained 56.2 per cent. fat
No. 314 contained 53.0 per cent. fat
No. 406 contained 45.0 per cent. fat
No cream contained any preservatives
1 pepperDo.Do.
3 laidDo.Do.Three were test samples
6 cocoaDo.Do.All these were test samples
3 vinegarDo.Do.Do.
1 golden syrupDo.Do.This was a test sample
6 jamDo.Do.All these were test samples
1 blackberry jellyDo.Do.This was a test sample
1 orange marmaladeDo.Do.Do.
†The defendant, a farmer, stated that he sometimes poured milk from one churn to another to fill up, and as one ch urn sampled at the same time had an excess of milk fat the magist rate gave him the benefit of the doubt and inflicte d no fine in this case.
Total Number of Samples analysed during the Quarter256
Number of Samples adulterated7
THIRD QUA RTER ENDING 30TH SEPTEM HER, 1920
75 milkFood Inspector, St. Marylebone Borough Council.Genuine.No sample contained any preservative or added colouring matter