London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

London County Council 1925

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for London County Council]

This page requires JavaScript

This represents a net result of 45-7 per cent, of ears cured of the completed cases.

Purely deaf children —Patients.Ears.
Total number of attendances5511,012
„ „ „ cases177326
„ „ „ cases completely cured4174
Patients.Ears.
Total number of cases improved917
„ „ „ „ unrelieved2235
„ „ „ „ under treatment on 31st December, 192596182

This represents as a net result of the completed cases 22.7 per cent. cured,
5.2 per cent. improved, 10.7 per cent. unrel eve 1.

The following table represents a complete analysis of all the lonisation work done at the ionisation centres from 1st April to 31st December, 1925

Causes of suppuration.Total cases.Cured.Lapsed.Sent to hospital.Still under treatment.
Acute Supp. Otitis media.11
Chronic Supp. Otitis media due to I. Tympanic conditions solely—
(a) Tympanic sepsis.4752989168
(6) T.S.—granulations136752257
(c) T.S.—polypi2271113
(d) T.S.—caries7124
(e) T.S.—other conditions1037
II. Tympanic conditions combined with—
(a) Tonsils and adenoids211713
(6) Nasal conditions29236
(e) Oral conditions
III. Tympanic conditions combined with—
(a) Attic disease1633372598
(6) Mastoid disease (no operation)1561147071
(c) Mastoid (operation already)39145119
IV. Tympanic conditions combined with—
(a) External otitis22
(6) Stricture of meatus11
External otitis7115
Cause undetermined
Totals1.06948429102454

It will be seen that 1,069 ears were ionised, and of these 29 lapsed ; 102 were
sent to hospital for mastoid operation; 484 were cured and 454 were still under
treatment at the end of the year.
This represents, as a net result, of the completed cases, 46-5 per cent, cured.
The percentage of cures is smaller than might be obtained by a more strict selection
of cases.
The reasons for this are as follows :—
Firstly, the cases which have been referred to the aurists for treatment, and in
particular by the treatment centre doctors, have been, in the main, advanced cases
of disease. They represent to a very large extent the worst cases under treatment
at the centres.
Secondly, instead of making a strict selection of the cases, and only ionising
those which appeared to be suitable cases, it has been the practice to go far beyond
this, even beyond what may be termed border line cases; and an endeavour has
been made to convert a large number of unsuitable cases into suitable ones, sometimes
with success but often without. This has naturally rendered the percentage
of successes rather low. If regard to high statistical results had been the first
consideration, this could have been attained by dealing only, by ionisation, with
those cases which were from the outset suitable.