London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

London County Council 1898

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for London County Council]

This page requires JavaScript

72
The number of cases of infectious disease reported in these houses was as follows—
diphtheria, 7 ; enteric fever, 5 ; erysipelas, 22 ; German measles, 4 ; scarlet-fever, 6 ; or 44 in all.
The number of deaths from various causes reported in these houses was 87.
The following table shows the number of common lodging-houses, the authorised number
of lodgers in such houses at the end of 1898, and the number of houses registered in each sanitary
district durinng the vear—

Common lodging-houses.

Sanitary district.Number of common lodging-houses.Authorised number of lodgers.Number of houses registered in 1898.
Battersea6227
Bermondsey3205
Bethnal-green13368
Camberwell10618
Chelsea18875
Clerkenwell5249
Fulham151
Greenwich16715
Hackney114401
Hammersmith8533
Hampstead135
Holborn11611
Islington461,251
Kensington32950
Lambeth8627
Lee110
Lewisham9109
Limehouse228641
Marylebone20870
Mile-end5204
Newington111,500
Paddington4921
Poplar129011
Rotherhithe3116
St. George-in-the-East175151
St. George, Southwark301,533
St. Giles321,822
St. James188
St. Luke4238
St. Martin4170
St. Olave1533
St. Pancras25946
St. Saviour's, Southwark17881
Shoreditch15772
Stoke Newington141
Strand11623
Wandsworth12269
Westminster191,3402
Whitechapel585,258
Woolwich37882
Total56028,3327

During the year 1898 there was change in the ownership of 43 common lodging-houses, and
in each instance such change was made the occasion of a survey of the house, with a view to the
requirement of any alteration found to be necessary. In this manner much improvement was
effected in many common lodging-houses, but the power to impose the necessary alterations was
not in many cases as great as was desirable. Houses which have once been " approved and
registered" under the Common Lodging-houses Acts are practically required to be judged in the
future by the requirements which were deemed to be necessary at the time of approval and
registration, often many years ago, when the standard of accommodation for the London poor
was much lower than at the present time. Particularly must be noted the insufficiency of cubic
space in many of such houses, this insufficiency in some cases being such that were the houses
ordinary dwellings in London the keepers would be liable to prosecution for overcrowding. While
it is obvious that the action of a local authority must be governed by consideration of the fact
that the letting of common lodging-houses is a trade from which the keeper properly expects a
reasonable profit, it is equally evident the existing law gives too much opportunity for the continuance
of old conditions. If common lodging-houses were subject, as in Scotland, to annual
to effect very necessary improvements in conditions which are now practically permanent. Such
licence, it would be possible by degrees, and without any undue interference with existing rights,
system of annual licensing would moreover enable control to be exercised in respect of houses
where the conduct of the house is a reasonable cause of complaint to the neighbourhood in which
it is situated. It is, however, proper to state that the condition of common lodging-houses,