View report page

89
No. 913. No tubercle bacilli could be found. Coagulation had beguri.
No. 910. No tubercle bacilli could be found. The milk appeared to be
normal.
No. 915. No tubercle bacilli could be found. The milk appeared to be
normal.
July 13th, 1900.
No. 916. No tubercle bacilli could be found. The milk was normal.
No. 917. No tubercle bacilli could be found, despite the fact that there is
a certain quantity of pus and no sufficiency of streptococci or other
organism to account for it.
No. 918. No tubercle bacilli could be found. The milk was normal.
No. 919. No tubercle bacilli could be found. There was an increase in the
number of leucocytes.
No. 920. No tubercle bacilli could be found. The milk was normal.
July 17th, 1900.
No. 6. No tubercle bacilli could be found. The milk contained rather more
leucocytes than normal.
No. 7. No tubercle bacilli could be found. There was a distinct amount of
pus together with streptococci. I should consider that this evidence
pointed to a simple (i.e., non-tuberculous) mastitis.
No. 8. No tubercle bacilli could be found. The milk was normal with
regard to leucocytes, but contained a very large number of bacteria.
No. 9. Neither tubercle nor pus could be found, but there was a very
large number of organisms present.
No. 10. No tubercle bacilli could be found. Both pus and blood were
found, and a large number of diplococci. This, I think, pointed to an
acute mastitis.
July 20th, 1900.
No. 11. No tubercle bacilli could be found. There was a slight excess of
leucocytes and a very large number of bacteria.
No. 12. No tubercle bacilli could be found. There was a very large
number of bacteria present, but otherwise the mils was normal.
No. 13. No tubercle bacilli could be found. There was a slight excess of
leucocytes, and the milk was very dirty.
No. 14. No tubercle bacilli could be found. There was a small amount of
pus and numerous streptococci and diplococci. This was, I think,
evidence of a non-tuberculous mastitis.
No. 15. No tubercle bacilli could be found. The milk was normal.
July 24th, 1900.
No. 16. No tubercle bacilli could be found. The only abnormal constituent
that could be found was a little blood.