London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

City of Westminster 1905

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Westminster, City of]

This page requires JavaScript

Continued from previous page...

Date of Hearing.Court and Magistrate.Name and Address of Defendant.Offence.Result.
12345
1905. 25th AugustMarlborough Street (Mr. Kennedy)Thomas Bowler, 41, Oxford StreetSelling milk from which 11 per cent. of fat had been abstractedFined £2 and 12s. 6d. costs.
25th AugustMarlborough Street (Mr. Kennedy)Annie Sumner, 135, Oxford StreetSelling milk with 11 per cent, of added waterFined £2 and 12s. 6d. costs.
25th AugustMarlborough Street (Mr. Kennedy)Catherine Egberts, 13a, Swallow StreetSelling milk containing 41 grains of boric acid per gallonFined £1 and 12s. 6cl. costs.
19th OctoberWestminster (Mr. Curtis Bennett)Thomas Grannaway, 22, Regency StreetSelling milk from which 9 per cent, of the original fat had been abstractedWarranty proved. Summons dismissed.
20th OctoberBow Street (Mr. Marsh am)The Cottage Tea Rooms, Ltd., 408, StrandSelling milk from which 7 per cent, of fat had been abstractedWarranty proved. Summons dismissed.*
* With regard to this case, the City Solicitors stated that it transpired during the hearing that the defendants did not open their premises until 8 o'clock or a little after in the morning, and that the milk churn was left standing at the front door from the time of its delivery until the shop was open, probably two hours; that the churn was merely fastened with string, and, if the string was untied or cut, the milk could have been tampered with by anybody who chose to do so ; that it was further admitted by the defendants' witnesses that the milk was not stirred before sale, as it was not the defendants' custom to sell milk, and that the milk was used for making cakes. The City Solicitors urged, under the circumstances, that it was impossible for the defendants to satisfy the Court that they sold the milk in the same state as they purchased it, as there was nothing to show what had happened to the milk whilst it was standing at the front door; that the Magistrate, however, said that he was satisfied that there had been no abstraction, and dismissed the summons. The City Solicitors state that they mention these facts to show the difficulty there is in getting a Magistrate to convict when there is a warranty.
3rd NovemberWestminster (Mr. Curtis Bennett)Zappeloni Bros., 7, Wilton Road, S.W.Selling milk containing 9 per cent. of added waterFined £1 and £1 3s. costs.
9th NovemberMarlborough Street (Mr. Kennedy)Devonshire Dairies, Ltd., 23, Union Street, TorquaySelling at 409, Oxford Street, milk containing 11 per cent. of added waterWarranty proved. Summons dismissed.