Hints from the Health Department. Leaflet from the archive of the Society of Medical Officers of Health. Credit: Wellcome Collection, London
[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Lewisham Borough]
This page requires JavaScript
Analysis of milk
During the year under review, 46 samples of milk were submitted to the public analyst by the Council's inspectors for examination. None of these samples was certified as adulterated or below standard. The average composition of the samples is set out in the following
table :—
Table 25
Period | Average composition of samples examined Percentage of | ||
---|---|---|---|
Milk fat | Solids not fat | Water | |
First quarter | 3.51 | 8.81 | 87.68 |
Second quarter. | 3.76 | 9.01 | 87.23 |
Third quarter | 3.75 | 8.80 | 87.45 |
Fourth quarter | 3.54 | 8.89 | 87.57 |
Average for year | 3.64 | 8.88 | 87.48 |
The legal standard is 3.0 percent milk fat and 8.5 percent solids not fat.
In addition, the following samples of heat-treated milk were submitted to the laboratory for bacteriological examination :—
Table 26
Milk | Parliamentary division | Total | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
West | North | South | |||
Pasteurised | 11 | 4 | 31 | 46 | All satisfactory |
Sterilised | — | – | 4 | 4 | All satisfactory |
Icecream — grading
During the year 68 samples of icecream were submitted to the laboratory for bacteriological examination with the following results :—
Table 27
Grading | Parliamentary division | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
West | North | South | ||
Grade I | 1 | 11 | 13 | 25 |
Grade II | 6 | — | 12 | 18 |
Grade III | 4 | — | 4 | 8 |
Grade IV | 10 | 1 | 6 | 17 |
TOTAL | 21 | 12 | 35 | 68 |