London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

London County Council 1920

Annual report of the Council, 1920. Vol. III. Public Health

This page requires JavaScript

35
progress under Part III, are White Hart Lane estate, Tottenham, of about 164 acres providing for the
housing of 3,638 persons, the Norbury estate where 60 houses were completed and 150 in course of erection
at the end of the year, and old Oak Estate, Hammersmith, with an area of 46½ acres and providing for
the housing of 2,231 persons. At this estate 183 houses were completed and 257 in course of erection at
the end of December, 1920.
Section 26 of the Housing, Town Planning, etc., Act, 1919, requires the Council to make by-laws
for regulating houses let in lodgings, such by-laws to be enforced by the councils of the several metropolitan
boroughs, with the exception of those by-laws in the series which deal with securing stability
and prevention of and safety from fire, which will be made and enforced by the Council.
Draft by-laws were in due course prepared by the Council and submitted to the borough councils
for their observations, and the Council is at the present time in correspondence with the Minister of
Health on the subject
From the date on which the Housing (Additional Powers) Act, 1919, came into operation until
31st December, 1920, 537 applications under Section 6 (Prohibition of demolition or change of use of
dwelling nouses) have been received. Of these 330 were found not to be affected by the section, the properties
being either unsuitable without reconstruction for being renderea fit for human habitation, or,
being in use on 3rd December otherwise than as dwelling houses. In 110 cases permission to demolish,
or to use the premises for purposes other than as dwellings was refused. In 94 cases demolition, or change
of use. was authorised.
By-laws as to
houses let in
lodgings.
Building
oontrol.

Tuble showing the number of houses in each borough in 1920; the number repaired under Section 28 of the Act of 1919; certain other particulars as to conditions in 1920 ; and the action taken by the metropolitan borough councils under the provisions of Section 17 of the Housing and Town Planning Act with regard to the making of representations and closing orders —the figures for the years 1914, 1915 to 1918, inclusive, and 1919, are included for comparison.

Metropolitan borough.No. of houses.No. of houses for the working classes.No. of representations.No. of closing orders.No. of houses demolished.
In borough.Inhabited by working classes.Repaired by local authority.ErectedIn course of erection.
1920.1920.1920.1920.1920.1914.1915-18.1919.1920.1914.1915-18.1919.1920.1914.1915-18.1919.1920.
Battersea26,11823,246179—185—11138——11____
Bermondsey19,14018,85077—30——13———46—36———
Bethnal Green14,709———13134—52519———2——
Camberwell————————3———————3
Chelsea——2——3————————8——
Deptford—————571—57——62——
Finsbury17,480tenements16,700————17———17—
Fulham26,14280%————1———1——————
Greenwich16,302——2192193———————————
Hackney34,67613,000——80—29———34——————
Hammersmith21,621——2961503726——638—1—25——
Hampstead12,0911,833———9116169116145——10
Holborn9,4169,021———23112111————
Islington—2 3rd—473252182118—161——
Kensington23,9005,6901—62139——39——————
Lambeth44,12333,093——2307—38177——177——6
Lewisham33,500———93—9——319——63——
Paddington17,6109,4434——55121554615————
Poplar22,472All11596 cotts.,102910—10294—21——
39 flats
St. Marylebone21,4007,266———1164——154—6—3—
St. Pancras23,34520,000——76 flats373716——4412—————
Shoreditch13,00012,4004—65 flats,—36——3———7——
14 cotts.
Southwark18,31011,956——90——437———17—32—15
Stepney36,000—50121562342659———24—
Stoke Newington————18 flats————————————
Wandsworth56,53941,5981108522——1—————61—
Westminster, City of————70—7———6——1139——
Woolwich26,22322,084—1225218337592934752

National Health Insurance Acts—Treatment of Tuberculosis.
The annual report last ye£tr contained a brief resume of the history of the development of organised
provision for the treatment of tuberculosis in London, and, in an appendix, the results of the working of
the Council's Tuberculosis Scheme during the years 1914-9 were reviewed in considerable detail by Dr.
F. N. Kay Menzies, following a survey of the whole field which included the inspection of each of the
tuberculosis dispensaries. The report indicated that a considerable amount of effective work had been
done in spite of the adverse conditions due to the war, but that there was a considerable number of defects
which called for remedy. It is only necessary here to revert to such matters in the report as led to action
on the part of the Council.
61004 f 2