London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

Holborn 1932

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Holborn Borough]

This page requires JavaScript

Continued from previous page...

Date of Notification.Patient.Sex.Age at date of Notification.Where Treated.Subsequent History.
2/5/23M.H.F11 mthsHospitalIn-patient at Queen Mary's Hospital, four months, walks well with appliances — at night wears two light metal splints for feet.
14/9/25B.T.M26 years"Hotel guest; could not be traced.
30/10/25V.H.F5"Removed from Borough —lost sight of.
24/11/30R.H.M111/12„ O.P.Goes to school—attends hospital monthly — condition satisfactory.
14/9/31P.C.M9/12 ""Died 18/9/31.
3/6/32G.C.M6 mths."Out-patient St. Bartholomew's Hospital — support for right foot when in bed.
30/8/32L.P.M13 years"Attends University College Hospital daily for massage—left arm in splint.
The table excludes one case notified 4/12/18 who was subsequently found not to be suffering from this disease.

Pneumonia.
Twenty-eight cases of pneumonia were notified during the year. Eight of
these were influenzal pneumonia. Thirty-three deaths were recorded from all
forms of pneumonia.
The 20 cases of primary pneumonia were notified at the following ages :—Under 1 year, 1;
from 1 to 5 years, 1; from 5 to 15 years, 5; from 15 to 35 years, 2; from 35 to 45 years, 4;
from 45 to 65 years, 4; and 65 years and upwards, 3. Seven were treated at home; 5 were
removed to L.C.C. hospitals; and 8 to voluntary hospitals. Two of the patients were nursed
by the Metropolitan Nursing Association under the arrangements made by the Council, in
all 7 visits being paid to these patients.
Enquiry respecting the cases of primary pneumonia elicited the following information ; —
7 resided in tenement lodging houses, 3 in separate private dwelling houses, 4 in model
dwellings, 1 in common lodging houses, 2 in hotels, and 2 in caretakers' apartments on business
premises, and 1 in a hospital (staff).
The cleanliness of the houses were reported satisfactory in 13 cases, but only fairly so
in 1, and in 1 case unsatisfactory. The economic conditions of the families concerned were
found to be good in 5 cases, fair in 8, poor in 2, very poor in 2; 4 out of the 7 oases treated
at home were nursed in a separate room. In 3 cases information as to economic condition was
not obtainable.