Hints from the Health Department. Leaflet from the archive of the Society of Medical Officers of Health. Credit: Wellcome Collection, London
[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Greenwich Borough]
This page requires JavaScript
Continued from previous page...
Sample No. | Article | Nature of Adulteration and/or irregularity | Action Taken | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1480 | Vintage Cider (Sweet) | Contained sulphur dioxide 350 parts per million. Cider may contain sulphur dioxide in a proportion not exceeding 200 parts per million. | Excessive sulphur dioxide due to residual sulphur in final rinsing of bottles immediately before filling with cider. All stocks withdrawn from retailers. | |
1525 | Channel Islands Milk | Contained fat 3.94% and solids-not-fat 8.92% corresponding to the deficiency of 1% of the milk-fat. Channel Islands milk should contain at least 4% of milk-fat. | When Processors were informed of the deficiency they stated their part of the sample was found to be genuine. Further samples taken proved satisfactory. | |
1564 | Lancashire Rarebit | The sample had dried up and spoiled owing to an imperfect seal on the plastic carton. | Isolated failure. Retailer advised with regard to rotation of stock. | |
1585 | Pork Luncheon Meat canned | Contained flour 5%, the presence of whidh was not disclosed on the label. | Packer of meat informed of Public Analyst's report, who took up this matter with the Manufacturers. | |
1595 | Shredded Suet | Contained fat 78%, flour 22%. Shredded suet should contain not less than 83% of fat. | Manufacturer informed of Public Analyst's report. Further samples taken proved satisfactory. | |
1639 | Evaporated Milk | The samples were semi-solid due to protein coagulation and unsuitable for ordinary use. | Remainder of stocks of this milk withdrawn from sale. | |
1640 | ||||
1641 | ||||
1642 | ||||
1664 | Tea | Consisted of the dried, milled leaf of the Aspalathus Contaminatus, a shrub known in South Africa as Rooibos or Rooibosch (The Red Bush). The description of the packet, "LOWTON Rooibosch TEA", in pseudo Chinese lettering was considered likely to be misleading since the Afrikaans name, Rooibos, is virtually unknown in this country and the product is not a species or brand of tea. | Despite exhaustive enquiries it was not possible to trace the whereabouts of the distributing Company and it was presumed the Company had ceased business. |