London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

Kensington 1920

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Kensington Borough]

This page requires JavaScript

Table showing Notifications of Infectious Diseases received in 1920, arranged inFour-Weekly Periods.

Four Weeks endingScarlet FeverDiphtheria.Enteric Fever.Erysipelas.Ophthalmia Neonatorum.Cerebrospinal Fever.Puer. peral Pever.Continued Fever.Pneumonia.Malaria.Dysentery.Encephalitis Le. thargica.Polio-Myelitis.Total.
January 312835—95122911——111
February 28243325411—2621——99
March 274438341—1—304———125
April 2424371841——13————88
May 224133355———9——1—97
June 192220269—1—71—1—69
July 1732236351——83———81
August 145414—36—2—61———86
Sept. 113515145—1———11164
October 96423141———1———195
November 68625172—114————127
December 48419165———9—1——125
Jan. 1, 192179243411——5——2—119
Totals617339246853591147124521,286
Cases of mistaken diagnosis are excluded from the above Table.

Scarlet Fever.—During the year the Metropolitan Borough Councils and the Metropolitan
Asylums Board were called upon to deal with the biggest epidemic of scarlet fever known in the
history of the Board.
The disease became prevalent in the month of July, and a few days subsequent to the re-opening
of the elementary schools after the summer holidays a very rapid rise took place and continued
throughout the Metropolis until the 23rd November, when there were no fewer than 5,664 scarlet
fever patients in the Board's hospitals. During this outbreak of scarlet fever there was a large
number of diphtheria cases notified, with the result that on November 23rd there were 8,669
patients in the Metropolitan Asylums Board Hospitals, or 1,511 more than the highest number
previously recorded.
There were 617 cases of scarlet fever notified in Kensington in 1920. The number of
notifications in the three previous years was 158, 234 and 260.
The following table shows the number of cases notified in each four-weekly period during the
year, and indicates those parts of the Borough most affected by the epidemic.

TABLE SHOWING THE INCIDENCE OF SCARLET FEVER IN THE THIRTEEN FOUR-WEEKLY PERIODS OF 1920.

District.Period No. 1.Period No. 2.Period No. 3.Period No. 4.Period No. 5.Period No. 6.Period No. 7.Period No. 8.Period No. 9.Period No. 10.Period No. 11.Period No. 12Period No. 13.
London1264117610819629639021171118416752907375333362363
The Borough28254527422333564068888881
North Kensington16173420251525423342596842
South Kensington128117178814726292039
Wards.
St. Charles466764513713162415
Golborne7256417111511242510
Norland386211610121014141310
Pembridge21175443614567
Holland91623336515344
Earl's Court12317437—41127
Queen's Gate11—2—————5766
Redcliffe142—712—218616
Brompton———2———11—26
Cases of mistaken diagnosis are not excluded from the above Table.

During the epidemic the Metropolitan Asylums Board were able to remove the vast majority
of patients to hospital at once but, at the busiest times, a little delay did take place in moving
some of the cases. Of the 617 Kensington cases, 538 were removed to hospital and no case the
Board were asked to receive was refused admission.
Although the epidemic was extensive, the cases were generally mild in character and the
extent of the outbreak was very largely due to this characteristic. The children affected were, in
some cases, so slightly indisposed that they were not kept in bed; they were not always kept away
from school and frequently there was no thought of calling in a doctor. These mild cases are just