London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972
View report page
Hints from the Health Department. Leaflet from the archive of the Society of Medical Officers of Health. Credit: Wellcome Collection, London
Chiswick 1907
[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Chiswick]
This page requires JavaScript
TABLE VI.
ANNUAL REPORT of MEDICAL OFFICER OF HEALTH for 1907, for the URBAN DISTRICT OF CHISWICK on the Administration of the Factory and Workshop (1901), in connection with FACTORIES, WORKSHOPS, LAUNDRIES, WORKPLACES & HOMEWORK.
| Premises. | Number of | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Inspections. | Written Notices. | Prosecutions. | |
| Factories (Including Factory Laundries.) | 43 | 4 | — |
| Workshops (Including Workshop Laundries.) | 165 | 8 | — |
| Workplaces (Other than Outworkers' premises included in Part 3 of this Report.) | 39 | — | — |
| Total | 247 | 12 | — |
2.—DEFECTS FOUND.
| Particulars. | Number of Defects | Number of Prosecutions. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Found. | Remedied. | Referred to H.M. Inspector. | |||
| Nuisances under the Public Health Acts:— | |||||
| Want of Cleanliness | 7 | 7 | — | — | |
| Want of Ventilation | — | — | — | — | |
| Overcrowding | — | — | — | — | |
| Want of drainage of floors | — | — | — | — | |
| Other Nuisances | 2 | 2 | — | — | |
| †Sanitary accommodation | insufficient | — | — | — | — |
| unsuitable or defective | 6 | 6 | — | — | |
| not separate for sexes | — | — | — | — | |
| Offences under the Factory and Workshop Act:— | |||||
| Illegal occupation of underground bakehouses (s. 101) | — | — | — | — | |
| Breach of special sanitary requirements for bakehouses (ss. 97 to 100) | — | — | — | — | |
| Other offences | — | — | — | — | |
| (Excluding offences relating to outwork which are included in Part 3 of this Report). | |||||
| Total | 15 | 15 | — | — | |
3.—HOMEWORK.
| NATURE OF WORK. | OUTWORKERS' LISTS, SECTION 107. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lists received from Employers. | Numbers of Addresses of Outworkers received from other Councils. | Numbers of Addresses of Outworkers forwarded to other Councils. | Number of Inspections of Outworkers' premises. | ||
| Twice in the year. | |||||
| Lists.‡ | Outworkers.‡ | ||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
| Wearing Apparel— | |||||
| (1) making, &c. | 12 | 25 | 33 | 16 | 33 |
| (2) cleaning and washing | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total | 12 | 25 | 33 | 16 | 33 |
4.—REGISTERED WORKSHOPS.
| Workshops on the Register (s. 131) at the end of the year. | Number. | |
|---|---|---|
| Important classes of workshops, such as workshop bakehouses, may be enumerated here. | Workshops | 147 |
| Workplaces | 31 | |
| Total number of workshops on Register | 178 | |
5.—OTHER MATTERS.
| Class. | Number. | |
|---|---|---|
| Matters notified to H.M. Inspector of Factories:— | ||
| Failure to affix Abstract of the Factory and Workshop Act (s. 133) | 2 | |
| Action taken in matters referred by H.M. Inspector as remediable under the Public Health Acts, but not under the Factor}' and Workshop Act (s. 5) | Notified by H.M. Inspector | — |
| Reports (of action taken) sent to H M. Inspector | — | |
| Other | — | |
| Underground Bakehouses (s. 101):— | ||
| Certificates granted during the year | — | |
| In use at the end of the year | 4 | |
*Including those specified in sections 2, 3, 7 and 8, of the Factory and Workshop Act as remediable under the
Public Health Acts.
†For districts not in London state here whether section 22 of the Public Health Acts Amendment Act, 1890, has
been adopted by the District Council; and if so what standard of sufficiency and suitability of sanitary accommodation
for persons employed in factories and workshops has been enforced.
‡The figures required in columns 2 and 3 are the total number of lists received from employers who sent them both
in February and August as required by the Act and of the entries of names of outworkers in those lists. They will,
therefore, usually be double of the number of such employers and (approximately) double of the number of individual
outworkers whose names are given, since in the February and August lists of the same employer the same outworker's
name will often be repeated.