London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

Heston and Isleworth 1946

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Heston and Isleworth]

This page requires JavaScript

RATS AND MICE DESTRUCTION.— Up to February, 1944, when the powers and duties under the Rats and Mice (Destruction) Act, 1919, were transferred to the Borough Council, Middlesex County Council was the responsible Authority. To deal with this work a Rodent Officer and two operatives were appointed, and a summary of the work is given below:—

194419451946
Complaints received227208240
Block inspections63859
Individual inspections6951,3211,492
Individual re-inspections146243322
Other visits191110248
Premises treated (a) by occupiers8882136
(b) by Local Authority317446660

The responsibility for keeping premises free from rats and mice rests with the occupiers. If they are
unable or do not care to undertake the necessary work themselves the services of the Council's operatives
are available on payment on a time and material basis. Not only must the rats on the premises be dealt
with, but also the conditions encouraging their presence if recurrence of infestation is to be avoided.
By whatever means rats and mice gain access to premises their continued presence there is generally
due to conditions on the premises which provide food and/or harbourage, and it is proper that the
occupiers should be required to do something about it. Test baiting and, where necessary, treatment
is carried out to sewers, watercourses, tips, etc., but unless occupiers take active measures to discourage
rats little progress will be made towards eradication.
HOUSING

During the war years action in regard to houses incapable of being rendered in all respects fit for human habitation at a reasonable cost was largely suspended except for keeping them wind and weatherproof and to-day the shortage of houses is such that houses suitable for demolition have to be retained. The housing shortage is causing physical, mental and moral strain and until this can be relieved by the provision of new houses action in regard to slum clearance must be postponed. Attention is being given to making good the deterioration in houses arising from the restrictions and difficulties of maintenance during the war years, but progress is slow because labour and materials are still scarce. A summary of the work done in connection with housing is given below:—

New houses erected—19391940194l19421943194419451946
(a) by Local Authority196
(b) by private enterprise27833
Houses inspected478260256308380249352718
Defective houses rendered fit in consequence of informal action247184246273266162156152
Defective houses rendered fit in consequence of statutory action27352933656845150
Houses in respect of which Demolition Orders were made35141
Houses demolished in pursuance of Demolition Orders431249528
Houses rendered fit in consequence of undertaking given by owner1211
Separate tenements or underground rooms in respect of which Closing Orders were made2
Houses demolished voluntarily1441
Houses in respect of which undertakings not to re-let accepted from owner211919
Houses known to be overcrowded (Housing Act standard) at end of year6969727779788084
New cases of overcrowding reported53106149
Cases of overcrowding relieved during year4154225

At the end of 1946 there were occupied 55 houses in respect of which Demolition Orders have been made
or undertakings not to re-let accepted from the owners. The above record cannot be accepted as a true
picture of overcrowding as such could be obtained only by a census or survey of all houses. The Housing
Act standard is a house and not a bedroom standard and therefore presents a picture very different from
the usual concept of overcrowding. The average number of new houses erected annually in the Borough
during the years 1931-38 was 1,330 and though that rate of development would probably have not been
maintained the loss due to the war must be considerable and will take some time to make good.
21