London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

Rotherhithe 1885

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Rotherhithe]

This page requires JavaScript

22
cost of the Metropolis at large. I am to state that the Vestry regret the Board
should have arrived at this decision, inasmuch as they consider that in order to render
the improvements carried out under the Acts of 1877 and 1882 perfect, and to open a
direct communication between London Bridge and Woolwich, as originallv contemplated
it is necessary that the roadway at this corner should be widened. The Vestry
therefore trust that in this view of the matter, the Metropolitan Board of Works will
reconsider their determination, and accede to the request of the Memorialists.
I am, Sir,
Your obedient Servant,
(Signed) JAMES J. STOKES,
To the Clerk, Clerk to the Vestry.
The Metropolitan Board of Works.
To which the following reply was received:
Metropolitan Board of Works,
Spring Gardens, S.W.
10th March, 1886.
Sir,
The Board has had under consideration your letter of 15th December
last, expressing the regret of the Vestry of Rotherhithe at the Board's decision, that the
setting back of the buildings at the junction of Union-road and Deptford Lower-road,
is not an improvement which should be carried out at the cost of the Metropolis at
large, and asking the Board for the reasons stated in the letter to reconsider its determination.
In reply, I have been directed to state for the information of the Vestry, that the
Board having again given its best attention to the matter, is unable to depart from its
previous decision, that the improvement is not one which should be carried out at the
cost of the Metropolis at large.
I am, Sir,
Your obedient Servant,
(Signed) J. E. WAKEFIELD,
1 o the Clerk of Clerk to the Board.
The Vestry of Rotherhithe.
In November, 1885, the Vestrv presented a Memorial to the Metropolitan Board
ol Works, as follows:—
To the Honourable the Metropolitan Board of Works.
The Memorial of the Vestry of the Parish of Rotherhithe,
in the County of Surrey.
Sheweth,
That your Memorialists are of opinion that increased means of
communication between the South Eastern and North Eastern districts of the Metrop.
oil are urgently required and that such communication should be by means of a low
level free Bridge, to be ericted across the River Iliames, either in continuation of the
Deptford Lower-road in your Memorialists' parish, or at some other point not far
distant therefrom. v

Charity Estates, &c.

The accounts of Messrs. Robert Foottit and Joseph Blake Oake, 1885-86, have been audited, and the following is a copy of the Charities Account, viz.:—

£s.J.
To balance received from late Churchwardens56011
To cash received from Stratford Estate to Lady-day, 188535137
„ Plaistow Estate (Norris) to Lady-day, 18857160
„ „ „ ,, (Moore) ,,16116
„ „ ,, (Norris) to Midsummer, 18853174
„ ,, „ „ (Moore) to Michaelmas, 1885844
„ „ Stratford Estate to Michaelmas, 188535106
„ ,, Plaistow Estate (Norris) to Michaelmas 18853174
„ „ „ (Moore) to Christmas, 18853174
„ ,, Stratford Estate to Lady-day, 188635106
„ „ Hill and Bell's Charity600
„ „ Smith's Charity4700
„ „ Sprunt's Charityv 078
„ Bennett's Charity900
„ „ Coat and Cloak Charity600
„ „ Mrs. Embleton's Charity5010
£285710
By cash paid for Bread, viz.—£s.d.£s.d.
F. Spillman10160
Matthews Bros.10160
H. Schmitt10160
A. J. Johnson10160
J. A. Johnson10160
G. F. Muller10160
F. Larenz10160
G. F. Mlantz10160
P Wolf10160
L. Menold10160
G. Wood10160
H Schmitt10160
W. Herwig10160
14080
By cash paid Treasurer of Charity School „ E. Willoughby, printing tickets for distribution of Bennett's Charity, 1885300
086
,, Sprunt's Charity distributed to six Widows578
„ Bennett's Charity distributed in 1/-tickets900
„ Coat and Cloak Charity600
„ Mrs. Embleton's Gift5010
„ Repayment to Rotherhithe Vestry on account of monies advanced re Charity Estate Balance paid to new Churchwardens
7000
46210
£285710