View report page

214
9 NOVEMBER, 1892.
deferred, and that the subject matter of such paragraph be
referred to No. 3 Committee for consideration and report,
especially with regard to Mr. Cox being appointed on the
same terms as the other two Sanitary Inspectors.
VI. The Report of Committee No. 2 was brought up as follows:
To the Vestry of the Hamlet of Mile End Old Town.
Report of Committee No. 2.
For Highways, Paving, Lighting and Watering.
Wednesday, 9th November, 1892.
Your Committee beg to report that they met on Wednesday,
the 2nd day of November, inst., there being present Messrs.
Hirst, J. Druitt, Andrews, Robertson, Wood, Loftus, and
H. E. Ludbrook.
That your Surveyor brought up and read a Report for
which your Committee beg to refer your Board to his Report
Book.
That having regard to the Report of your Clerk, and a letter
of the 21 st October, ult., from Messrs. Phelps, Margetson,
and Co., Solicitors, your Committee resolved to recommend—
(1) That the Vestry do not compromise the action by Mr.
Stacey for compensation for alleged accident, but that the
Clerk be instructed to take all necessary steps to defend the
action under the instructions of your Committee.
That your Committee pursuant to the reference back b)'
your Board, further considered the application of Messrs.
Mann, Crossman & Co., and resolved to recommend—
(2) That upon condition that Messrs. Mann, Crossman & Co.
enter into such a covenant as may be approved by your
Committee for fully protecting the interests of the Vestry and
of the inhabitants of property adjoining the streets through
which the pipes pass, no opposition be made to the application
of Messrs. Mann, Crossman & Co. for permission to lay
a 6 inch pipe from their premises in Raven Row to the
boundary of the Hamlet in Cannon Place, being a distance of
about 350 feet.
That your Committee considered letter from the London
County Council, as follows :