View report page

25 NOVEMBER, 1891.
193
Moved by Mr. Chidgey seconded by Mr. Birks and resolved
—That the use of the Vestry Hall be granted as requested.
XIV. The Clerk submitted various communications in reference
to—
(a) Amendment of Valuation (Metropolis) Act, 1869.
(b) London Water Supply.
Resolved—That the communications be referred to No. 1
Committee for consideration.
XV. The Clerk submitted letter from the Vestry of Kensington,
on the subject of the London Building Law (Consolidation)
Bill, and inviting four delegates to be appointed to attend a
Conference at the Vestry Hall, Kensington, on the 2nd
December next.
Moved by Mr. Hirst seconded by Mr. Steadman and
resolved—That four delegates be appointed.
The following members were nominated viz.: Messrs.
Catmur, R. Kemp, Wood, Chidgey and Lacey.
The names were submitted to a show of hands and there
were
In favour of Mr. Catmur 16 votes
„ R. Kemp 22 „
„ Wood 20 „
„ Chidgey 21 „
„ Lacey 11 ,,
The Chairman declared Messrs. R. Kemp, Chidgey, Wood
and Catmur elected.
XVI. The Clerk read letter of 19th inst., from the London
County Council on the subject of Locomotives on RoadsBye
Laws.
Moved by Mr. Calton seconded by Mr. Hirst and resolved
—That it be referred to No. 2 Committee for further consideration.
XVII. Mr. Richardson by consent withdrew the motion standing
in his name on the agenda paper, stating, that the question
would be considered by the Special Committee, previously
appointed in reference to the petition of the Dustmen, &c.
XVIII. NOTICES OF MOTION.
By Mr. Steadman.
That, in the opinion of this Vestry, the costs incurred in
Mrs. Nott's Case is a gross waste of the ratepayers'
money, and, we are further of opinion, that the guinea