View report page

8 APRIL, 1891. 11
A division was demanded and upon such division there
appeared
In favour of the amendment—Messrs. Andrews, Baxter,
Birks, Blowey, J. Brown, Browning, Cade, Calton, Collett,
Hirst, J. D. Kemp, W. A. Kemp, Lacey, Nicholls, Ockelford,
Padfield, Peacock, Richardson, Roberts, Robinson, Schweitzer,
Steadman.—22 votes.
Against the amendment—Messrs. Chidgey, Coker, Cook,
Cushen, A. Druitt, Furness, Hasted, Henley, E. Kemp,
Livermore, Lyon, Mc Ewen, Manchee, Martin, Taylor,
Thomas, Upton, Wood.—18 votes.
The Chairman declared the amendment carried, and then
submitted it as a substantive motion and declared it carried.
call for lighting.
Moved by Mr. Padfield seconded by Mr. Coker and resolved
—That that part of the Report be adopted and it was resolved
accordingly.
call for general purposes.
Moved by Mr. Padfield seconded by Mr. Coker and resolved
—That that part of the Report be adopted and it was resolved
accordingly.
VI. Moved by Mr. Furness seconded by Mr. E. Kemp and
resolved—That the Vestry at its rising do adjourn until this
day fortnight at 7 p.m.
V. [Resumed] loan of .£4,000.
Moved by Mr. Cushen seconded by Mr. Upton and resolved
—That that part of the Report be adopted, and it was resolved
accordingly.
PRINTING CONTRACT.
Moved by Mr. Cushen and seconded by Mr. Lacey—That
that part of the Report be adopted.
Moved by Mr. Steadman and seconded by Mr. Richardson
as an amendment—That advertisements be issued inviting
tenders for Printing in the usual way.
The Chairman submitted the amendment to a show of
hands and declared it lost.
A division was demanded.
The Chairman stated that the numbers of those in favour
of the original motion, were so many, that he did not consider
a division necessary, but if those opposed to it would
rise in their places their names should be recorded which
being agreed to,