View report page

22
cation; it is therefore, competent for the Vestry to order
the independent analysis of any or all such samples.
I consider the results of these analyses as very satisfactory
to both purchasers and sellers in this Hamlet, as
also to this Board. Nearly all the articles were genuine,
and the small remainder practically so: there was only
one exception, in the way of considerable adulteration,
in the sample of coffee, No. 21, already referred to.
Altogether, I consider the Act of 1872 has proved
satisfactory beyond expectation, both by its deterrent
effects and its practical working.
The Bill of 1875, which I believe has not yet finally
passed into an Act, appears after every discussion to
become more assimilated to that of 1872. I believe,
however, it will contain necessary and just modifications
in favor of the seller, without at the same time
prejudicing the interests of the purchaser. Clauses 5
to 8 in the new Act are so modified as to avoid. protection
to really fraudulent sellers, and clause 8 will
have a strong influence in the same direction. Judging
by my observations of the general influence and working
of the Adulteration Act, I believe it has been
productive of much good, but trading competition contributes
in a large degree to ensure excellency and purity
in human food.
I am, Gentlemen,
Your most obedient Servant,
MATTHEW CORNER.
Vestry Hall,
July 21st, 1875.