View report page

28
Date of Meeting.
With regard to the delay in the sending in of the Supplemental
Valuation List for the Parish of Fulham, a long discussion took
place between the Committee and the Parish Officers, who expressed
their regret that the List had not been delivered to the Committee
within the stipulated time, and promised that this year's List should
be sent in at once, and that in future there should be no cause for
similar complaint.
30 Oct. 1888. Read letter from the Vestry Clerk of the Parish of Fulham,
forwarding a Supplemental Valuation List for that Parish, in
duplicate, dated the 11th instant.
The Clerk submitted the said List, received from the Overseers on
the 29th instant.
Resolved unanimously—
That the Supplemental List for the Parish of Fulham be considered,
and objections (if any) thereto heard at a Meeting of this Committee
to be held on Tuesday, the 13th proximo, at 12 o'clock (noon).
13 Nov. 1888. Letter read from the Local Government Board, dated 7th November,
1888, stating that the Board learn from Mr. Jebb, Clerk to
the Managers of the Metropolitan Asylum District, that the Assessment
Committee of this Union have failed to furnish him with the
Supplemental Valuation List as required by the Valuation (Metropolis)
Act, 1869, and requesting that the List in question may be transmitted
without further delay, or that the Board may be informed
why it cannot be sent.
Resolved unanimously—
That it be referred to a Sub-Committee, consisting of the Chairman
of the Committee, Mr. Dell, Mr. Schofield, and Captain Berkeley, to
prepare a reply to the Local Government Board's letter, and to
submit the same to this Committee at their Meeting to be held on
Thursday next.
20 Nov. 1888. At the request of the Sub-Committee appointed at the last
Meeting, the Clerk submitted their draft reply to the communication
received from the Local Government Board, on the subject of the
non-transmission of the Supplemental Valuation List for the Parish
Fulham to the Clerk to the Managers of the Metropolitan Asylum
District.
The same having been read, it was unanimously resolved, on the
motion of Mr. Seymour, and seconded,—
That the proposed reply be adopted by this Committee and
transmitted to the Local Government Board.