View report page

103
state, with reference to a perishable article, that no change
had taken place in the constitution of the article
that would interfere with the analysis. Consequently,
except for a rough opinion, we never give a certificate of
prosecution in the case of a sour milk.
When, however, the analysis of a thoroughly stale milk
as in the case under consideration, states the amount of
total solids as considerably higher than in the fresh milk,
even after a fortnight's keeping, we may infer with certainty,
the incorrectness of such analysis. The total solids must
decrease on keeping, and afford, to some extent, proof
(or otherwise) of the correctness of the original analysis.
I am thankful to state that the Magistrate was
completely convinced of the correctness of my views as to
the milk in its original condition, supported as it was by
the Somerset House chemists.
Four Breads have been examined. They were decidedly
good of their kind, although one sample was
deficient in salt. Several Sweet-meats were analysed.
The Cough Lozenges were harmless and quite free from
any preparation of opium. A sample of Lime-juice, sold
as effervescent. was such, but very weak of its kind.
Two Port wines, two Sherries, three Whiskeys, and one
Brandy require but little comment. One of the sherries
was more plastered than the other, and the spirits were
all above the standard of the Act.
The Ales, three in number, were good of their kind.
During the present quarter, ale No. 168, was the subject
of a magisterial decision. It was attempted to throw
the blame upon the water and the sugar used in the
brewing. But when I mention that the water only
accounted for five grains and the sugar for a further five
grains of common salt, whereas the ale contained 190
grains, the defence did not count for much.