View report page

33
Number of premises visited, 2,780, of which 38 were empty.
Number of families enumerated 3,715
,, ,, overcrowded 145=3.9%
,, ,, uncrowded 3,570
1,921 premises were occupied by one family.
687 ,, ,, two families.
118 ,, ,, three families.
16 ,, ,, four or more families.
The worst case of overcrowding was that of a family of 10 persons
occupying accommodation suitable for 6½; at the other end of the table
is a family of 1 person in accommodation sufficient for 16.
Seven Sisters Ward.
Number of premises visited, 2,835, of which 25 were empty.
Number of families enumerated 4,036
,, ,, overcrowded 245=6.07%
,, ,, uncrowded 3,791
1,718 premises were occupied by one family.
944 ,, ,, two families.
141 ,, ,, three families.
7 ,, ,, four or more families.
The worst case of overcrowding was that of a family of 9½ persons
occupying accommodation suitable for 3; at the other end of the table
is a family of 3 persons in accommodation sufficient for 17½.
Stamford Hill Ward.
Number of premises visited, 2,207, of which 45 were empty.
Number of families enumerated 3,102
,, ,, overcrowded 55=1.77%
,, ,, uncrowded 3,047
1,362 premises were occupied by one family.
706 ,, ,, two families.
82 ,, ,, three families.
12 ,, ,, four or more families.