View report page

49
(c) Instances where (apart from analysis) the requirements
as to labelling or declaration of preserved cream in Article
V. (1) and the proviso in Article V. (2) of the Regulations
have not been observed:—
Nil.
(d) Particulars of each case, in which the Regulations
have not been complied with, and action taken:—
Nil.
3. Thickening substances:—Nil.
4. Other observations, if any:—Nil.
5. Action taken in connection with Paragraph 4 of the
said Circular Letter 162:—
"No cases ocurred in which an 'appeal to the cow'
was made."
6. Action taken under Section 4 of the Milk and Dairies
(Amendment) Act, 1922:—
Seven cases of colouring matter were reported by the
Analyst:—
1. Samples 154, 155. Purchased from the same
veyor. Information laid in respect of No. 154.
2. Samples 216, 217. Same purveyor. Letter of caution
sent. First offence.
3. Sample 219. This was purchased from No. 2
veyor. Letter of caution sent.
4. Samples 368, 369. Same purveyor. One information
was laid in respect of No. 369 only, as this
also failed to meet the required standard for
Solids not Fat, and an inclusive penalty for dual
infringement was imposed.