Hints from the Health Department. Leaflet from the archive of the Society of Medical Officers of Health. Credit: Wellcome Collection, London
[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for West Ham]
This page requires JavaScript
36
(c) Instances where (apart from analysis) the requirements
as to labelling or declaration of preserved cream in Article V. (1)
and the proviso in Article V. (2) of the Regulations have not
been observed—
Nil.
(d) Particulars of each case, in which the Regulations have
not been complied with, and action taken—
Nil.
3. Nil.
4. Nil.
5. Action in connection with Paragraph 4 of the said
Circular Letter 162 : —
No cases occurred in which an "appeal to the cow" was
made.
6. Action taken under Section 4 of the Milk and Dairies
(Amendment) Act, 1922 : —
No cases occurred in which it was necessary to take action
under this section.
£ | s. | d. | |
---|---|---|---|
Nuisances (Public Health Act)— | |||
274 Summonses—Total Fines | 27 | 10 | 0 |
Total Costs | 34 | 11 | 0 |
169 Summonses withdrawn. | |||
Failure to comply with Magistrates' Orders— | |||
29 Summonses—Total Fines | 96 | 2 | 6 |
Total Costs | 1 | 1 | 0 |
6 Summonses withdrawn. | |||
Adulterated Milk (Food and Drugs Act)— | |||
9 Summonses—Total Fines | 13 | 0 | 0 |
Total Costs | 10 | 7 | 0 |
4 Summonses dismissed. | |||
Baking Powder (useless as such)— | |||
3 Summonses—Total Fines | 0 | 0 | |
Total Costs | 3 | 17 | 6 |